From the pictures I have seen(not one around to pick up) the small grip for the 2.0 seems smaller than the small for the 1.0. For those of you that have both are they the same or is the 2.0 smaller. I have very smalll hands so I am interested in the difference.
Thanks ,
Tbird

From a youtube review i watched the guy said they are the same that S&W just added a fourth palm swell that is between the medium and large that is labeled "medium large".

I don't remember which review it was since I have watched very many.

You are correct. It comes with 4 now. S, M, M/L, and L


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I believe you are correct, but I have a talon grip on my 1.0 and clearly don't need one on the 2.0 because of the uber aggressive stippling on it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yea you definitely won't need a talon grip on the m2.0, its rough.

I held one of the M2.0's with the small grip, but could only shoot the one with the Medium grip. The small was considerably smaller (and a better fit for my small hands).

If any of you own/handled a Sig P320, is the 2.0's grip texture akin to the P320's sandpaper texture?

M2.0 is significantly more aggressive than the p320 texture.

Can anyone verify if the grip width is the same from 1 to 2.0?

__________________
NRA Life Member

It feels exactly the same shape and width to me. Just way more aggressive and you do have one more back strap option

Hopefully they'll start shipping them with ten round magazines soon for us in the unfree states.

__________________
NRA Life Member