Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols > Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols

Notices

Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols All Variants of the Smith & Wesson M&P Auto Pistols


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-05-2017, 12:24 AM
AZ115 AZ115 is offline
Member
M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 199
Likes: 126
Liked 45 Times in 34 Posts
Default M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison

I was lucky enough to purchase a 2.0 5" FDE in .40.
I got the camera out and took a few side by side pictures with my trusty 40c.

I also added pictures of a 9c barrel that I swap out at the range. I'm thinking of getting the Storm Lake M&P pro 40 to 9mm conversion barrel. It should fit and work just fine.

In regards to the new textured grip, which I really like, It did not go so well with a in the waistband holster, ouch!(Thinking of you guys who are getting the regular 2.0's) I would not be able to carry concealed my 40c if the grip was textured like this. Deffinately a OTW carry or need of some padding to protect your skin!

Trigger is improved over the original M&P. I do like the tactile reset. I have not looked as to how it all works, but I like it. I'll probably be leaving the trigger alone. I Do have Apex parts in my 40c. Quite happy with it.

2.0 fits fine in most of my M&P holsters. Also accepted other full size 40 magazines that I have.

Can't wait for range trip...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2.0 FDE and 40c.jpg (94.8 KB, 1196 views)
File Type: jpg Grips.jpg (58.9 KB, 727 views)
File Type: jpg Slides.jpg (96.9 KB, 721 views)
File Type: jpg Barrels 1.jpg (155.6 KB, 631 views)
File Type: jpg Barrels 2.jpg (129.0 KB, 579 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 02-13-2017, 11:32 PM
mjohn mjohn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sandbox City VA
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 8 Posts
Default

I would like to say thank you for your efforts. Very good job with the photos and the explanations. Many have learned from your post. Excellent.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-15-2017, 12:32 PM
Umami13 Umami13 is offline
Member
M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison  
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 27
Likes: 3
Liked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Default New M&P m2.0

Though I like the new gun in some respects I really miss the beaver tail on the new pistol that is what set it apart from the other striker fired pistols out there. Did it severe a really purpose maybe not but to me it added something to the gun. Just an opinion.. we will have to see what the performance shop comes up with as a pro model not a big fan with the safety on the 5 inch model not against safeties for 1911 but striker fired pistols are different guns. Not that a miss fire couldn't happen but with the short crisp trigger on the 1911 seems more plausible.. Again just my opinion..
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 02-15-2017, 03:57 PM
Shield9mm Shield9mm is offline
Member
M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison  
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: South-FL
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 190
Liked 470 Times in 322 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Umami13 View Post
I really miss the beaver tail on the new pistol that is what set it apart from the other striker fired pistols out there. Did it severe a really purpose maybe not but to me it added something to the gun. Just an opinion..
That's one of the features that I like the most of the 1.0
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #5  
Old 02-16-2017, 11:48 PM
zork52 zork52 is offline
Member
M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison  
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Thanks for posting this thread. I was wondering specifically about the rougher texture grip and any IWB carry or even just having shirt tails over this material. Seemed like they went from "too smooth" to "too rough". Anyone else doing any IWB carry with 2.0's that can chip in here?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-17-2017, 02:46 AM
ThrowinRocks ThrowinRocks is offline
Member
M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 296
Likes: 35
Liked 123 Times in 82 Posts
Default

I had a chance to handle the M&P 2.0 and I agree. The grip texture is way to aggressive. We can hope Talon grips will soon be available.

I also noticed trying to use the slide stop to release the slide for lefties won't work. I'm a lefty and using my thumb to pull down the slide stop resulted in no action.
Myself and the guy who owned it field stripped it and the notch for the slide stop is only on one side(left) so when pulling down on the slide stop on the right side takes more strength but all is does is cause the slide stop to flex never releasing the slide.
Think I'll keep the Gen 1. lol
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 02-21-2017, 12:49 AM
AZ115 AZ115 is offline
Member
M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 199
Likes: 126
Liked 45 Times in 34 Posts
Default

I finally made it to the range on saturday. This 2.0 FDE was just taken out of the box and shot, No cleaning, oiling, parts swap or anything.

I put 200 round thought my 2.0 FDE .40. I shot 100 rounds of 165gr(Walmart Winchester)and 100 round of 180gr.(Walmart Federal) No issues with amo. I reallly couldn't feel much of a diffrence between the two(I do prefer 180gr. with my M&P 40c).

I started at 5 yards and went out to 15 yards only. Grouping and follow up shots were good. I did a few rapid fire shots at 5 and 10 yards.

The more I shot, the more I wanted to remove the 1911 style safety. I just din't like it being there.

I also started to notice my shots were a little low and to the right. I really noticed it at 15yds. No biggie, I got a laser I can slap on and adjust as needed. I did shoot my M&P 40c and I was hitting at point of aim.

The trigger is good but it can be better. As I was shooting, I started to feel that S&W grittiness. I had a closser look on Sunday. I only pollished and smothhed it out quite a bit. I think I brought the trigger pull down another 1/2 lb. I'm deffinately adding the $40 plastic Apex trigger.


Pictures...I'm adding my 15 rounds at 15yrds, grip texture and striker block pics.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 15 at 15yrds.jpg (28.5 KB, 212 views)
File Type: jpg 20170219_034050843_iOS.jpg (52.7 KB, 188 views)
File Type: jpg 20170219_033634984_iOS.jpg (116.4 KB, 184 views)
File Type: jpg 20170219_202134681_iOS.jpg (35.0 KB, 251 views)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-21-2017, 08:50 AM
Lost Lake's Avatar
Lost Lake Lost Lake is offline
Member
M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,310
Likes: 1,039
Liked 2,358 Times in 1,117 Posts
Default

I've been carrying a Shield 45 which has the new grip and it definitely tears your skin up when IWB. I'm going to switch back to my 9mm or maybe sand the body side of the grip.
__________________
Kirk / Spock 2020
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-21-2017, 09:16 AM
CBStuard CBStuard is offline
Member
M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison  
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Manassas Va
Posts: 437
Likes: 1
Liked 182 Times in 127 Posts
Default

I really have to wonder how S&W got that grip so wrong. I wonder if one could sand just the body side?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-21-2017, 09:18 AM
ThrowinRocks ThrowinRocks is offline
Member
M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 296
Likes: 35
Liked 123 Times in 82 Posts
Default

I'd suggest the rubberized Talon grips and preserve the
Shields original look.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-21-2017, 11:14 AM
Amp's Avatar
Amp Amp is offline
Member
M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison  
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Southwestern Pennsylvania
Posts: 721
Likes: 159
Liked 648 Times in 290 Posts
Default

Just my opinion. The grip is perfect to me.
I may never carry this gun but for range and house work its great.
__________________
Some assembly required..
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #12  
Old 02-21-2017, 09:47 PM
undercoverjoe undercoverjoe is offline
Member
M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4
Likes: 4
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I took a softer nail file and smoothed down the 2 places where it was rubbing. Worked perfect, no rubbed spots and feels great in my hand.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-21-2017, 09:51 PM
undercoverjoe undercoverjoe is offline
Member
M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4
Likes: 4
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I am looking for another mag for my 2.0 9mm in FDE. Any suggestions for a good place order?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-21-2017, 10:20 PM
ThrowinRocks ThrowinRocks is offline
Member
M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 296
Likes: 35
Liked 123 Times in 82 Posts
Default

Are the one from the M&P9 compatible?
Old #19440
New #194400000
Smith & Wesson S&W M&P 9mm Luger 17-Round Steel Factory Magazine

Last edited by ThrowinRocks; 02-21-2017 at 10:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 02-21-2017, 11:56 PM
AZ115 AZ115 is offline
Member
M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 199
Likes: 126
Liked 45 Times in 34 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThrowinRocks View Post
Are the one from the M&P9 compatible?
Old #19440
New #194400000
Smith & Wesson S&W M&P 9mm Luger 17-Round Steel Factory Magazine
Yes they are compatible. I Can buy used ones locally for $20 to $30. Brand new ones are $35 on up.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-22-2017, 12:06 AM
ThrowinRocks ThrowinRocks is offline
Member
M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 296
Likes: 35
Liked 123 Times in 82 Posts
Default

So the $25.99 I listed is a great buy since people are buying them up.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-22-2017, 06:48 AM
Grott Grott is offline
Member
M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison M&P 1 and 2.0 comparison  
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 9
Likes: 2
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by undercoverjoe View Post
I am looking for another mag for my 2.0 9mm in FDE. Any suggestions for a good place order?
Midway just had a sale, sorry I didn't see this soonerM&P 1 and 2.0 comparison

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comparison cardguy Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 4 03-29-2016 03:50 PM
gun comparison M&PmikeC Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 7 03-27-2014 09:16 PM
gun comparison Dietmar New Members Introduction 6 07-25-2011 06:30 PM
What a comparison ancient-one The Lounge 9 05-08-2010 12:19 PM
RB vs. SB Comparison mattz357 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 6 11-06-2009 11:29 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)