|
|
04-14-2018, 02:39 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 10
Likes: 3
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Comfort/Concealability of Shield Original vs 2.0
I'm probably gonna make 1 or the other my edc. But I'm concerned about the grip texture. I often wear a t-shirt over an iwb holster for cross-draw so the grip will probably rub my side/belly area. I've read where sanding the grip of the 2.0 helps, but would I be better off for comfort with the earlier model? Also, does the original print less than the 2.0.
|
04-14-2018, 05:57 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 605
Likes: 105
Liked 399 Times in 248 Posts
|
|
I carry the Shield 45. The texture is a bit rough against the skin but not overly aggressive. I took a nail buffing block and lightly sanded the inward side. I usually wear a t-shirt to protect my skin and I haven't noticed any rub area.
|
04-14-2018, 11:08 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 2,383
Liked 2,954 Times in 1,054 Posts
|
|
The 2.0 grip texture is too sharp for some. Easily adapted to whatever you need.
Sand it in stages until you get where it is comfortable, as has been suggested in dozens of posts.
Put a grip sleeve on it, which will make it bigger, and that may be an advantage.
Use grip tape. Again, bigger.
Or go with the 1.0 that some complain is not grippy enough, so it might need to be enhanced too.
As grips get more grippy, they tend to snag covering garments, especially a t-shirt, and potentially print. They wear the garment faster. They can interfere with moving the covering garment out of the way.
You need a comfortable but secure grip on a CCW. These two characteristics are not mutually exclusive, but you will likely have to compromise and customize a bit to get what works for you.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-14-2018, 11:13 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 292
Likes: 223
Liked 264 Times in 136 Posts
|
|
I lightly sanded the entire grip to just knock off the tip of the pyramid. Now my skin isn’t rubbed raw by my car seat bolster rubbing the gun against my skin, and my shirt doesn’t ride up the other side. You can’t tell I did it if you looked for it.
|
04-14-2018, 11:16 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Triad Area North Carolina
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 1,184
Liked 2,027 Times in 826 Posts
|
|
Just put the Talon Rubberized grips on it. problem solved.
afox1.jpg
__________________
Hipcocked45
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-14-2018, 12:06 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 542
Likes: 4
Liked 339 Times in 181 Posts
|
|
I am having trouble understanding how the exact same size of gun could print any differently.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-14-2018, 12:14 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 292
Likes: 223
Liked 264 Times in 136 Posts
|
|
The grip texture and the trigger make the 2.0 the better buy.
|
04-14-2018, 01:17 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 736
Likes: 2,823
Liked 518 Times in 278 Posts
|
|
I handled them all last month in my quest to buy a shield 9.
I hated the 2.0 version grips so much, I bought a 1.0......
(it helped that the 1.0 was on sale for $293 cash.)win win
__________________
S&W BG380, S&W 915 9mm
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-14-2018, 01:22 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 4,468
Likes: 3,068
Liked 4,294 Times in 1,610 Posts
|
|
Been there-Done that. IMHO, the rubberized Talon grip panels make either gun more comfortable to shoot and carry.
__________________
Dave
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-14-2018, 06:56 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 10
Likes: 3
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I'm just thinking the 2.0, with its more aggressive surface, would tend to "grab" clothing more easily & thus show more of its outline. At this point, unless I find the trigger on the original to be awful, I may save myself some coin & go with it. Its trigger is supposedly about a pound heavier than the 2.0, and quite frankly I think I'd prefer that. Maybe not for everyone but I think it'd work for me.
|
04-14-2018, 06:57 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Manassas Va
Posts: 437
Likes: 1
Liked 182 Times in 127 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyingfool
I am having trouble understanding how the exact same size of gun could print any differently.
|
When you have a shirt draped over a pistol, and the shirt gets pulled up(bending over or reaching up to a shelf), a real grippy pistol will tend to keep the shirt up so the pistol could be seen below the shirt or the bulge of fabric would be more noticeable. Or, if you twist your upper body to one side, a grippy pistol will grab the shirt fabric and the shirt will get stretched tightly over the pistol. Looking at it from a different perspective, a real soft knit shirt shows more than a shirt made from something more like a thin canvas.
|
04-19-2018, 11:09 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 96
Likes: 130
Liked 65 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
For me, it's the Shield hands down. I have the 2.0C, but it's for home defense. I use the Shield-9 when I carry. The grip texture on the 2.0 is great for the range. No tenderness after 500 rounds per session, with a couple thousand so far. It's just fine, but not for carry. It's the clothing lifting on the grip issue. It happens.
The Shield is a masterpiece for concealed carry. Draws and rotates into battery very fast because of the short barrel, is reasonably accurate, and is undeniably reliable. It also lends itself well to instinctive point shooting at very close range - under 10 ft. People are far more likely to have a shooting take place closer rather than farther. A short, difficult to grab barrel matters. The Shield has no tactical rail to give a close adversary a handhold. I ground off the rail on my 2.0 first thing.
I love both the 2.0 and the Shield, but it's the snubby that goes with me when I pack.
Last edited by Flintlock1; 04-19-2018 at 11:10 PM.
|
04-20-2018, 05:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 148
Likes: 22
Liked 86 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
I am one who put the sand paper to my Shield 45 when I first got it. Just a little bit, but enough to take the tops off the "nibs" . I carry IWB usually and though I sort of liked the rough texture my skin did not to a small extent.
I'm quite happy with the texture now smoothed just a little bit. The grip shape and angle are almost perfect, or at least seems that way now.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|