|
|
09-02-2018, 10:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Confusion on shield 45
Hi everyone. I’ve been away for a while with health issues but Imfine now and need some help. I want to buy a shield 45 but am confused about the 2.0 variation on the 45. Are all 45’s 2.0 or ones with just a safety or just ones with the laser. Are they all stamped 2.0 on the slide? I’ve searched quite a bit but found nothing concrete. Thanks in advance.
|
09-02-2018, 10:06 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: metro Phoenix
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 16,363
Liked 3,962 Times in 1,603 Posts
|
|
They aren't stamped, but the 45 seems to have the 2.0 trigger. I suspect that since the 45 was introduced in the same general time frame as 2.0, they just went ahead and incorporated the upgrades instead of doing it later.
By the way, I have an older Shield 9 to compare to, and there are differences in the trigger pull.
|
09-02-2018, 10:10 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 4,667
Likes: 1,437
Liked 4,488 Times in 1,927 Posts
|
|
There are no 45’s stamped 2.0 as noted.
|
09-02-2018, 10:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Thanks guys. I guess the confusion started when I saw a 45 pic on s&w web site that had a 2.0 stamped on the slide.
|
09-02-2018, 10:44 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Rural NW Oklahoma
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 1,156
Liked 1,979 Times in 466 Posts
|
|
Full size and compact has 2.0 on the slide. My 45 shield doesn’t
__________________
No gold. Only lead. Bobby
|
09-02-2018, 10:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
That’s crazy. I just looked on their website again to make sure and they have pics with the 45 shield and 2.0 stamped on the left side of the frame. Go figure.
|
09-02-2018, 10:57 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Montana
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Liked 151 Times in 63 Posts
|
|
The 45 Shields are all of the 2.0 version. It's just that the first ones released do not have "2.0" stamped on them.
Last edited by BigSky!; 09-03-2018 at 08:11 PM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
09-02-2018, 11:01 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Ok. That makes sence. Do you know about when they started stamping them?
|
09-03-2018, 12:15 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: middle Tn
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 3,918
Liked 3,237 Times in 906 Posts
|
|
I bought one yesterday and it is not stamped. But the trigger and skew (sp) are correct for 2.0.
|
09-03-2018, 12:44 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Ok. Thanks guys. Hey how do you like em?
|
09-03-2018, 02:20 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 614
Liked 1,719 Times in 628 Posts
|
|
I like mine a lot. If I'm carrying .45 it's to one that's IWB even though I have a Sig 245, S&W 4566TSW, and a 4513TSW in the safe. It's lighter than the 'real' (not plastic) guns, eats what I feed it, and has an excellent trigger, plus I like that it has a safety.
(Full disclosuer: I do carry the 4513 some of the time, but mostly it's the Shield. And I just picked up a Ruger P97 and you can be SURE I won't try carrying that inside a belt. I've got a little red wagon I use to tow it...it's a sweet shooting pistol for sure, but BIG and heavy and never designed for concealed carry. )
|
09-03-2018, 06:57 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 52
Likes: 15
Liked 21 Times in 16 Posts
|
|
The Shield 45 was 2.0 before the 2.0 was released.
|
09-03-2018, 07:05 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Georgetown, Tx
Posts: 2,344
Likes: 2,562
Liked 2,871 Times in 1,185 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Longbow565
Ok. Thanks guys. Hey how do you like em?
|
Love it. Started with the Shield 9mm, bought the 45 ACP when they first came out, so it is not stamped 2.0. The 45 ACP has a better trigger and grip texture than my 9mm 1.0. Both are great pistols.
I have almost 1100 rounds through the 45 without any sort of malfunction.
I have over 2500 rounds through the 9mm with about 3 FTEs that occured within the first 250 rounds. None since.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-03-2018, 09:47 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Thanks everyone. I own the full size 9mm 2.0 with the threaded barrel and put an apex semi drop in barrel in it and couldn’t be happier. It turned a fairly accurate gun into a tack driver. No malfunctions at all. I guess I’ll sell my Glock 43 to my buddy and buy a M&p shield in 45.
|
09-03-2018, 04:04 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 176
Likes: 155
Liked 102 Times in 56 Posts
|
|
Bought my Shield .45 about 4 months ago it is stamped 2.0 Thing is a joy to shoot. My P220 is semi-retired
|
09-03-2018, 05:18 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In The Woods Of S.C.
Posts: 8,838
Likes: 13,934
Liked 13,639 Times in 4,938 Posts
|
|
I like mine. It even shoots lead bullets well.
__________________
S&W Accumulator
|
09-04-2018, 09:16 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 25
Likes: 53
Liked 59 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ken158
There are no 45’s stamped 2.0 as noted.
|
I just bought one yesterday. 2.0
0903182158a.jpg
|
09-04-2018, 01:07 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Liked 318 Times in 216 Posts
|
|
Agree. I bought an early run w/ no stamp and a later run that is stamped 2.0.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigSky!
The 45 Shields are all of the 2.0 version. It's just that the first ones released do not have "2.0" stamped on them.
|
|
09-04-2018, 03:11 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 25
Likes: 53
Liked 59 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike, SC Hunter
I like mine. It even shoots lead bullets well.
|
And cycles hollow points like it was nothing.
|
09-14-2018, 11:10 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oil City, PA
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 860
Liked 1,125 Times in 563 Posts
|
|
I just bought a Shield 45 that is stamped 2.0. It has the night sights. It’s trigger feels about the same as my 3 yr old Shield 40.
Looking on the S&W website, it does not say that my model does not have the 2.0 trigger. Is there a noticeable difference in the old trigger and the 2.0 trigger?
__________________
SDMF
Last edited by speedyquad; 09-15-2018 at 02:00 AM.
|
09-15-2018, 05:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 307
Likes: 289
Liked 353 Times in 139 Posts
|
|
All 45 Shields have the same 2.0 triggers
Last edited by FloridaS&W; 09-15-2018 at 05:12 PM.
|
09-15-2018, 05:35 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: CA Central Coast
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 915
Liked 6,591 Times in 2,191 Posts
|
|
If you go to the S&W website and browse Pistols using M&P Shield 2.0 for the Series and .45 Auto for the Caliber as the selection field choices, 10 Shield .45 models just came up for me.
Of those 10 model options, 9 of them had Shield 45 slides marked with the M2.0 designation (but all of them came up as M2.0 models).
Here's one of them:
M&P(R)45 SHIELD M2.0™ Tritium Night Sights No Thumb Safety | Smith & Wesson
The only one which doesn't have the M2.0 on the slide is this one, but the model description states it's a 2.0 Shield.
M&P(R)45 SHIELD M2.0™ Thumb Safety | Smith & Wesson
If you just select M&P Shield for the Series, and .45, a list of 12 of them comes up, and all but 2 of them contain the M2.0 description (2 are PC models and don't contain the M2.0 language in their designation).
If you find the SKU Number that interests you, you might call and confirm with the factory that it's a M2.0 model. Or look at the language description on the box label.
However, it kinda looks like the newer Shield 45's are coming with the M2.0 marking on the slide.
__________________
Ret LE Firearms inst & armorer
|
09-16-2018, 11:10 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 542
Likes: 4
Liked 339 Times in 181 Posts
|
|
My understanding as that the very first 45 versions I believe it was the shield 45 did not have the 2.0 envgraved in the slide. This was because of marketing. They wanted to bring the 45 shield to market. But they didnt want to pre-emt the full blown 2.0 marketing campaign until they had the full size and kther models to offer all at once.
So apparently S&W decided to NOT emboss the 45 shield with the 2.0 description on the slide. And waited to do that to correspond to the whole roll out of the 2.0 line.
From what I understand, the only difference is the slide engraving. All else was/is identical.
IF that is true, there may be some collector value for these 2.0 guns that are NOT engraved as there will only be a limited number of these guns compared to the full 2.0 production marked slides. But frankly I doubt it would add much if any value at all.
|
09-16-2018, 11:28 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: So Cal (Near Edwards AFB)
Posts: 14,710
Likes: 2,926
Liked 17,102 Times in 6,271 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ken158
There are no 45’s stamped 2.0 as noted.
|
None?
The answer is that the M&P Shield 45 came out before the rest of the M2.0 series. It was the first with the more rough texture. It was the first with the new trigger. They just hadn't called it the 2.0 yet.
We will probably see all the new ones with M2.0 on them from now on.
__________________
Freedom isn't free.
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|