Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols > Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols

Notices

Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols All Variants of the Smith & Wesson M&P Auto Pistols


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-03-2020, 05:34 PM
Sheepdogged Sheepdogged is offline
Member
Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations  
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 290
Likes: 437
Liked 299 Times in 134 Posts
Default Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations

If anyone is curious, here are pictures of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's three size Configurations.

The grip sleeve for the compact (15+1 round) configuration is a bit loose. The sleeve for the full-size (17+1) magazine, however, is nice and tight comparatively.

As you're probably aware, when you get the Subcompact it will come with the two sleeves (one compact and one full-size). You might just buy both from the outset, or you might be looking to choose one one to start with since adding magazines can get pricey. If you don't already have a preference, I recommend the full-size just because it makes the gun a little more controllable due to its larger size & shape, the grip sleeve fit is better (tighter), and there are more more rounds if you carry an extra magazine (without adding much length in the magazine).

Of course, if you think for concealment purposes you want to start out with the compact, by all means do that. And like I said, if money isn't an issue, buy both. If I didn't already have other compact carry options and I had to decide one over the other, I might opt for the 15+1, but I do, and I like the full-size better for the reasons I stated herein, but everyone is different.

Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations-1-jpg

Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations-2-jpg

Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations-3-jpg
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.jpg (123.8 KB, 552 views)
File Type: jpg 2.jpg (124.4 KB, 553 views)
File Type: jpg 3.jpg (124.1 KB, 552 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 07-04-2020, 02:06 AM
Raisin's Avatar
Raisin Raisin is offline
Member
Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Central Washington state
Posts: 327
Likes: 182
Liked 161 Times in 93 Posts
Default

I like the 15 round magazine size with the sleeve to fill the gap. It makes the grip the same size as a Shield so it's just as easy to conceal as the Shield but heavier of course.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-04-2020, 08:28 AM
bloodlord77 bloodlord77 is offline
Member
Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 158
Likes: 2
Liked 80 Times in 47 Posts
Default

I love the 2.0 Subcompact. It's my EDC in all types of weather. Here's a side by side with my shield 40.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20200601_171855.jpg (114.5 KB, 127 views)
__________________
The Penetration Channel

Last edited by bloodlord77; 07-04-2020 at 08:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-20-2020, 10:40 AM
Echo40's Avatar
Echo40 Echo40 is offline
Member
Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations  
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 7,683
Liked 7,379 Times in 2,512 Posts
Default

Old thread, I know, but as someone who has been looking into getting a new carry gun with the M&P40 Subcompact in mind, this has been extremely helpful because I was wondering about the size difference.
__________________
Shooting Comfort is bilateral.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-20-2020, 06:02 PM
CBStuard CBStuard is offline
Member
Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations  
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Manassas Va
Posts: 437
Likes: 1
Liked 182 Times in 127 Posts
Default

I have the 1.0 compact which is very similar to the 2.0 sub-compact. It's 6 years old now and carried every day. I love having the choice of 12, 15, and 17 rnd mags depending on how I am dressing at the moment.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 12-20-2020, 06:21 PM
Raisin's Avatar
Raisin Raisin is offline
Member
Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Central Washington state
Posts: 327
Likes: 182
Liked 161 Times in 93 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CBStuard View Post
I have the 1.0 compact which is very similar to the 2.0 sub-compact. It's 6 years old now and carried every day. I love having the choice of 12, 15, and 17 rnd mags depending on how I am dressing at the moment.
Same here CB. As I am sure you know You can buy sleeves to fit fil the gap between 17 round mags and the compact grip. I have been making my own sleeves to fill the gap when I use the 15 round mags, which I prefer to carry most of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-07-2021, 11:15 PM
notnowme02 notnowme02 is offline
Member
Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations Pics of the M&P M2.0 3.6" Subcompact's 3 Size Configurations  
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 3 Posts
Default

I lucked out. Was able to get the newer June 2020 version that has the better front cocking serrations. And it shoots really good too. Better than my 9c

Sent from my SM-N986U1 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
**SOLD** Vedder Light Tuck - Fits M&P 2.0C 3.6", 2.0 Subcompact & Compact 1.0 DamnYankee Accessories/Misc - For Sale or Trade 2 02-17-2020 12:41 PM
M&P9 M2.0 3.6" Subcompact vs. Shield Height Sheepdogged Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 2 02-02-2020 01:10 PM
THE AR IN ALL OF ITS CONFIGURATIONS williamlayton The Lounge 18 01-03-2014 04:16 PM
Subcompact Single Stack M&P 9 "Slim" paragon1 Smith & Wesson - The Wish List 5 08-08-2009 12:04 AM
Any news on the 3" 1911 subcompact? sox Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 0 06-14-2009 05:06 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:29 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)