Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols > Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols

Notices

Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols All Variants of the Smith & Wesson M&P Auto Pistols


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-13-2021, 05:05 PM
BSA1 BSA1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 957
Liked 1,555 Times in 680 Posts
Default Say it ain’t so Joe...

...that production of the 1.0 Shield is being discontinued immediately. I have gifted one with the safety to a daughter and a non-safety one to my wife. I have been thinking about a non-safety one for myself due to recent back surgery.

For me double stack subcompacts are too bulky and heavy for conceal carry. The single stacks fit in the gun pocket on my wife’s purses and adds a lot of weight to her purse. Both ladies prefer the softer grip texture. We all love the reliability of the Shield. The double stack is more weight that I do not want.

Time to start thinking about a different gun.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-13-2021, 05:20 PM
Saudade's Avatar
Saudade Saudade is online now
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: SoCal, CA
Posts: 2,241
Likes: 735
Liked 1,039 Times in 671 Posts
Default

The article I read says 1.0. Not 2.0. The CA Compliant models will also continue.

Smith & Wesson to Discontinue Shield 1.0 Models Effective ImmediatelyThe Firearm Blog
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 04-13-2021, 06:17 PM
catcus-jack catcus-jack is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 442
Likes: 127
Liked 373 Times in 161 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BSA1 View Post
...that production of the 1.0 Shield is being discontinued immediately. I have gifted one with the safety to a daughter and a non-safety one to my wife. I have been thinking about a non-safety one for myself due to recent back surgery.

For me double stack subcompacts are too bulky and heavy for conceal carry. The single stacks fit in the gun pocket on my wife’s purses and adds a lot of weight to her purse. Both ladies prefer the softer grip texture. We all love the reliability of the Shield. The double stack is more weight that I do not want.

Time to start thinking about a different gun.
The Shield Plus weighs less than the Shield or Shield 2.0 and the little bit of width on the grip is very minimal.
Watch Julie Golobs 2 new videos on Youtube.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 04-13-2021, 07:21 PM
Ranger17's Avatar
Ranger17 Ranger17 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Back in WI
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 624
Liked 1,845 Times in 837 Posts
Thumbs up

To be honest I am surprised they still made the 1.0 Shield.
Between the 2.0, Plus, EZ and the PC models there are so many variations the 1.0 likely didnt add sales. Just took from one of those other versions.
Just a thought.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 04-13-2021, 07:33 PM
STORMINORMAN STORMINORMAN is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 2,129
Likes: 1,170
Liked 1,399 Times in 846 Posts
Default

And new ones were approaching under $200 each (after rebate) before the dem-panic... Can't make any money THAT way!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 04-13-2021, 07:36 PM
BSA1 BSA1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 957
Liked 1,555 Times in 680 Posts
Default

Is the weight empty or fully loaded?

.6 oz. is a lot considering the extra metal for the magazine. I wonder where they shaved the weight? Of course when fully loaded the Shield Plus will weight more. Anyway having the 1.0 and 2.0 Shield competing against each other doesn’t make business sense.

The 1.0 is dead but not forgotten (yet anyway).

Last edited by BSA1; 04-13-2021 at 07:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 04-13-2021, 07:39 PM
Golphin's Avatar
Golphin Golphin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Micanopy Florida
Posts: 1,536
Likes: 6,645
Liked 2,476 Times in 948 Posts
Default

I owned a Shield 1.0 and now have a 2.0 and both are pretty much the same pistol with the 2.0 a little better trigger I guess. Same size as far as I know and use the same magazines.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 04-13-2021, 09:15 PM
Model 10-8 Model 10-8 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 104
Likes: 265
Liked 86 Times in 50 Posts
Default

Was it called Shield 1.0, or was that needed when the Shield 2.0 came along?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-13-2021, 09:17 PM
LCC LCC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Oregon
Posts: 980
Likes: 1,248
Liked 2,286 Times in 675 Posts
Default

Sig 365...you'll never look back
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 04-13-2021, 09:34 PM
catcus-jack catcus-jack is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 442
Likes: 127
Liked 373 Times in 161 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LCC View Post
Sig 365...you'll never look back
I put a 365 in the safe in favor of the Shield Plus and I am not looking back.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #11  
Old 04-13-2021, 11:02 PM
LVSteve's Avatar
LVSteve LVSteve is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lost Wages, NV
Posts: 20,060
Likes: 24,591
Liked 29,388 Times in 10,932 Posts
Default

Get Walther PPS M2 and call it done.
__________________
Release the Kraken
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #12  
Old 04-13-2021, 11:05 PM
seldon14 seldon14 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 427
Likes: 88
Liked 399 Times in 197 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranger17 View Post
To be honest I am surprised they still made the 1.0 Shield.
Between the 2.0, Plus, EZ and the PC models there are so many variations the 1.0 likely didnt add sales. Just took from one of those other versions.
Just a thought.
My guess is they had just been using up the last of there 1.0 slide and frames, and that those part stock piles are finally starting to run out.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #13  
Old 04-14-2021, 08:29 AM
Ranger17's Avatar
Ranger17 Ranger17 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Back in WI
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 624
Liked 1,845 Times in 837 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by seldon14 View Post
My guess is they had just been using up the last of there 1.0 slide and frames, and that those part stock piles are finally starting to run out.
And it’s possible that parts may now become available for purchase if they no longer are part of production.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #14  
Old 04-14-2021, 06:14 PM
scott.amy00 scott.amy00 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 66
Likes: 97
Liked 67 Times in 29 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Model 10-8 View Post
Was it called Shield 1.0, or was that needed when the Shield 2.0 came along?
The 1.0 designator is just used by us consumers to differentiate between it and the 2.0...I don't believe it's ever been officially referred to that by S&W

Sent from my SM-A115U using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-14-2021, 06:19 PM
scott.amy00 scott.amy00 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 66
Likes: 97
Liked 67 Times in 29 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LCC View Post
Sig 365...you'll never look back
I went with the Hellcat option over the P365 when looking a replacement for my Shield and couldn't be happier. Between the two, the Hellcat fits my hand way better, the sights are better and just shoots better and the grip texture is beautiful! Of course these are just my opinion...oh I've added an Apex trigger kit and it's absolutely fantastic!

Sent from my SM-A115U using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-15-2021, 03:41 AM
HEADKNOCKER's Avatar
HEADKNOCKER HEADKNOCKER is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Grab Your Ankles
Posts: 2,973
Likes: 852
Liked 628 Times in 343 Posts
Default

All the M&P Shields I've seen in over a year where the 1.0 with less texture & no trigger stop..
I assumed this was S&W getting rid of the older frames & magazines from inventory..
I'm glad that We came across the Shield 2.0 9mm & the texture on this pistol is amazing, No Need for Talon grips etc.. Good To Go from the factory.. Bought October 2019 for $249..
Only thing I've done to this pistol is buy two extra magazines which where the 1.0 style BTW + a couple holsters & ammo
Attached Images
File Type: jpg M&P Shield 2.0 3 Magazines.jpg (97.3 KB, 80 views)
File Type: jpg P1240040.jpg (95.7 KB, 69 views)
__________________
MightShowYouHisSmith&Wesson
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #17  
Old 04-15-2021, 08:11 AM
uncleted327 uncleted327 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 509
Likes: 6
Liked 787 Times in 294 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BSA1 View Post
...that production of the 1.0 Shield is being discontinued immediately. I have gifted one with the safety to a daughter and a non-safety one to my wife. I have been thinking about a non-safety one for myself due to recent back surgery.

For me double stack subcompacts are too bulky and heavy for conceal carry. The single stacks fit in the gun pocket on my wife’s purses and adds a lot of weight to her purse. Both ladies prefer the softer grip texture. We all love the reliability of the Shield. The double stack is more weight that I do not want.

Time to start thinking about a different gun.
You do realize the 2.0 and the Plus are not the same right? Why would you have to look for a different gun just because the old 1.0 is being discontinued? The 2.0 has a better trigger and grip texture, which could be softened if it's too aggressive for some, otherwise they are the same as the 1.0...

Last edited by uncleted327; 04-15-2021 at 08:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-15-2021, 08:52 AM
grizz700's Avatar
grizz700 grizz700 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Southeastern Washington
Posts: 111
Likes: 264
Liked 109 Times in 54 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BSA1 View Post
...that production of the 1.0 Shield is being discontinued immediately. I have gifted one with the safety to a daughter and a non-safety one to my wife. I have been thinking about a non-safety one for myself due to recent back surgery.

For me double stack subcompacts are too bulky and heavy for conceal carry. The single stacks fit in the gun pocket on my wife’s purses and adds a lot of weight to her purse. Both ladies prefer the softer grip texture. We all love the reliability of the Shield. The double stack is more weight that I do not want.

Time to start thinking about a different gun.
I have a first gen Shield and now have a plus. You can barely tell the difference between the two size wise. The grip is slightly wider but nothing what you would expect for a double stack which is really a 1.5 stack. And I really like the way it fits my hand and the trigger is awesome.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-15-2021, 08:57 AM
Telecaster Telecaster is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 865
Liked 4,575 Times in 1,518 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Model 10-8 View Post
Was it called Shield 1.0, or was that needed when the Shield 2.0 came along?
It's like introducing your spouse as, "My first wife."

The grip of the Plus is about 1/8" thicker, otherwise they seem to be the same size and use the same holsters as the 1.0 and 2.0.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-15-2021, 09:25 AM
Echo40's Avatar
Echo40 Echo40 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,849
Likes: 7,692
Liked 7,404 Times in 2,514 Posts
Default

To be honest, I'm surprised that they kept it in production this long, but then again, based on pricing, it seemed like it was being offered as a budget alternative to the Shield 2.0 models.

Regardless, it makes no great bit of difference since the 1.0 and 2.0 models share parts, so the Shield 1.0 will still most likely remain peripherally supported by S&W as far as Warranty/Repairs are concerned.

That being said, I'm really not surprised to see that the 1.0s are being dropped, as it seems as though they weren't selling anymore, presumably because the average consumer wasn't aware of how similar the 1.0 and 2.0 models actually were, ergo they'd opt for the 2.0 under the presumption that it was a substantial upgrade.

Seriously, back in January I was able to order a NiB Performance Center M&P40 Shield 1.0 for only $360 on Clearance while the equivalent 2.0 model was going for at least $550, and to me a rougher grip texture and a slightly better trigger wasn't worth the extra $200+.

Whats your latest purchase? "guns/accessories"-20210107_132530-jpg

Granted that they've since come out with the Shield PLUS, which would logically seem to be the heir apparent to the Shield Series, but currently it's only available in 9mm, and depending on which way the wind blows down the line it's advantage in terms of magazine capacity may effectively be rendered moot.
__________________
Shooting Comfort is bilateral.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #21  
Old 04-15-2021, 09:29 AM
Bozz10mm's Avatar
Bozz10mm Bozz10mm is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Georgetown, Tx
Posts: 2,350
Likes: 2,564
Liked 2,881 Times in 1,189 Posts
Default

I never understood why they continued to market the 1.0 after the 2.0 came out. I have one of each and the 2.0 is superior, albeit it slightly.

Same with Pmags. Why do they continue selling the Gen 2 after the Gen 3 came out?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-15-2021, 10:00 AM
BSA1 BSA1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 957
Liked 1,555 Times in 680 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uncleted327 View Post
You do realize the 2.0 and the Plus are not the same right? Why would you have to look for a different gun just because the old 1.0 is being discontinued? The 2.0 has a better trigger and grip texture, which could be softened if it's too aggressive for some, otherwise they are the same as the 1.0...
Well slap me silly and call Shirley for preferring the 1.0 Shield over the 2.0 model. We both also prefer the M&P 9mm 4.25” Gen. 1 with APEX Duty Trigger over the 2.0.

With the 1.0 Shield being discontinued it will mean hunting the used guns for one. Maybe a dealer will have a n.i.b. one at a cheap price to avoid the “disadvantages” by buyers of the older model.

Maybe I should open a orphanage for unwanted 9mm 1.0 Shields and M&P’s.

Last edited by BSA1; 04-15-2021 at 10:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #23  
Old 04-19-2021, 01:28 PM
jasonlthomas.111 jasonlthomas.111 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I own a 1.0 (talon grip) and now a Plus...aside from texture I feel no difference in width, etc

Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-19-2021, 03:53 PM
6mm250 6mm250 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
Default

I have a couple of the original Shields , it doesn't say 1.0 anywhere on them.
Kinda like my two Ruger Standard Models that were labeled a Mark 1s when I bought them.

In the first case people felt the need to invent a label , in the second case they didn't know any better.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-19-2021, 04:09 PM
mrstang01 mrstang01 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: KY
Posts: 89
Likes: 16
Liked 42 Times in 23 Posts
Default

What exactly are the differences?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-19-2021, 05:03 PM
Echo40's Avatar
Echo40 Echo40 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,849
Likes: 7,692
Liked 7,404 Times in 2,514 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6mm250 View Post
I have a couple of the original Shields , it doesn't say 1.0 anywhere on them.
Kinda like my two Ruger Standard Models that were labeled a Mark 1s when I bought them.

In the first case people felt the need to invent a label , in the second case they didn't know any better.

Mike
Typically companies don't label their first generation products as such because it makes no sense from a marketing standpoint to do so. (If they labeled the Shield 1.0 as the 1.0 right from the start, then it would have only hurt sales by either confusing consumers into thinking that there was already a 2.0 on the market or otherwise that it was planned obsolescence in action.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrstang01 View Post
What exactly are the differences?
The Shield 2.0 has a more aggressive grip texture, improved trigger pull, and abbreviated front slide serrations.
The Shield PLUS is slightly wider in the grip to accommodate a double stack magazine and an improved trigger design over the 1.0/2.0 models.

Note: There are no differences between the M&P45 Shield 1.0 and 2.0 aside from rollmarks, as the M&P45 Shield was the basis of the 2.0 redesign of the M&P9/M&P40 Shield, and thusly already included the 2.0 features right from the beginning. The 2.0 slide marking on the M&P45 Shield were added later on merely for the sake of clearing consumer misconceptions that the M&P45 Shield was inferior to the M&P9/40 Shield 2.0s.
__________________
Shooting Comfort is bilateral.

Last edited by Echo40; 04-19-2021 at 05:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-19-2021, 05:41 PM
mrpski's Avatar
mrpski mrpski is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: SW desert
Posts: 5
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by catcus-jack View Post
The Shield Plus weighs less than the Shield or Shield 2.0 and the little bit of width on the grip is very minimal.
Watch Julie Golobs 2 new videos on Youtube.
I bought both a 40 and 45 performance center Shield when they first came out and despite the 4 or 5 other CCW weapons I own I carry one or the other of these Shields every day. Sorry they do not make them anymore but I expect mine will outlive me. Good guns taken care of last more than one lifetime polymer or not. So yes, either look for something else or I would guess there is a million or so of them out there on the used market.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-19-2021, 09:13 PM
DUSTYDOGDAN DUSTYDOGDAN is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Idaho
Posts: 349
Likes: 1,823
Liked 452 Times in 189 Posts
Default

In December 2019 I bought a Shield (1.0) for a crazy low price. They Were $269 at Cabela's. There was a $50-dollar instant coupon and then S&W had a $50 rebate that I filed electronically. I had that $50 Visa gift card within 7 days. Because I bought it at Cabela's and used my Cabela's credit card and with redeeming my Cabela's bucks I ended up spending $40 dollars for the Shield(1.0) I bought a Hogue slip on grip and when using an 8 round 2.0 Magazine with its extra stippling the pistol feels great in my large hand. I did not need another micro 9 because I already owned a Sig P938 and a Kimber 9 but I have to say I love my Shield (1.0)!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:50 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)