Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Rifles and Shotguns > Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles

Notices

Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles Dedicated to the Smith & Wesson M&P-15 Rifles


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-14-2010, 08:51 AM
JohnK JohnK is offline
US Veteran
new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases  
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee., USA
Posts: 749
Likes: 2
Liked 384 Times in 170 Posts
Default new to Picatinny bases

I've mounted a zillion scopes in my long life, all kinds of mounts, and rings, but never on one of these rails, and on a straight stock rifle.

I just purchased a M & P 15 "optics ready" 5.56 mm. Due to the flat top, do you have to order higher rings, compared to a bolt rifle ?

I usually use medium rings to mount 40 mm objective scopes. Do you need high, or extra high rings now ?

How about a 32 mm objective ?

Is your sight line uncomfortable, with the straight stock, and low mount ?

I have read that "most" Weaver rings fit the Picatinny. Explain "most", but not all.

Old dogs need to learn new tricks...............
__________________
NRA Instructor
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-14-2010, 10:35 PM
arizona98tj's Avatar
arizona98tj arizona98tj is offline
US Veteran
new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 733
Likes: 62
Liked 265 Times in 146 Posts
Default

I've put a couple of different optics on my OR M&P15.

Here is a write-up with a few photos.

Smith & Wesson M&P15 - 1
__________________
Stu
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-15-2010, 09:35 AM
JohnK JohnK is offline
US Veteran
new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases  
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee., USA
Posts: 749
Likes: 2
Liked 384 Times in 170 Posts
Default

Great write up on the MP.

I plan to mount a Leupold VX1 2 X 7-33 mm on mine. Hate to spend the $$$ for an ACOG, but it would be nice.

I still don't understand the difference in picatinny, and weaver rail dimensions, anybody that can help this old codger with this?
__________________
NRA Instructor
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-15-2010, 09:56 AM
ken158 ken158 is offline
Member
new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1,449
Liked 4,519 Times in 1,935 Posts
Default

A Picatinny slot width is 0.206 and a Weaver slot width is 0.180. Therefore, Weaver rings are made to fit Weaver slots and don't fit tight in a Picatinny slot - but once tightened on the sides, do suffice on a low recoil gun like a .22
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-15-2010, 11:53 AM
JohnK JohnK is offline
US Veteran
new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases  
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee., USA
Posts: 749
Likes: 2
Liked 384 Times in 170 Posts
Default

Thanks Ken, just completed a web search, and found those dimensions.

Another difference is Picatinny has a consistent spacing of .394", Weaver spacing is inconsistent.
__________________
NRA Instructor
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-16-2010, 12:45 AM
arizona98tj's Avatar
arizona98tj arizona98tj is offline
US Veteran
new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 733
Likes: 62
Liked 265 Times in 146 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnK View Post
Another difference is Picatinny has a consistent spacing of .394", Weaver spacing is inconsistent.
That is quite true. There are a number of "Weaver" rail dimensions floating around, depending on who made it.

I have a pre-ban Eagle Arms EA-15. It has something like a Weaver rail on it. LOL!!! It is more of a ******* rail than it is anything else. I have a high dollar riser on it that accepts a pair of quality rings.....at least I can put and optic on it.
__________________
Stu
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-16-2010, 08:09 AM
Sven Sven is offline
Member
new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases  
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northern Minnesota
Posts: 711
Likes: 172
Liked 227 Times in 126 Posts
Default

Timely thread. I logged on to post just about the very same question. I also have an optics ready M&P15. I was seriously looking at that Millett scope you bought, Stu, but I was afraid the outer ring might get too bright for loow-light coyote calling/hunting. I instead mounted a 30mm Bushnell red dot (and green dot) with 4 reticles. I think they're a 2 moa dot, a 2 inside a 30 moa ring, a 10 moa dot and a fine cross hair. the loest setting on green seems to work well after dark.

My question is the standard rings that came on the Bushnell are a bit too low. So what do I need? I can use it the way it is, but not quickly or comfortably. Looking in a MidwayUSA catalog, Burris makes an extra high 30mm ring for a picatinny rail for about $50. Unless I hear different, that's what I'll order.

I also just ordered a set of Daniel Defense rail mounted iron sights. They are not fold-down -- I figured to save myself about a hundred bucks to spend elsewhere. I mainly wanted them for the service rifle matches at my local club. I hope they'll stay fairly close in adjustment (as well as the red dot) when I swap back and forth for the red dot.

Nice write up Stu. That reminds me I have a couple of write ups I need to get done for work. Enough gun talk for a while!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-16-2010, 08:34 AM
JohnK JohnK is offline
US Veteran
new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases  
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee., USA
Posts: 749
Likes: 2
Liked 384 Times in 170 Posts
Default

Still learning, if I have this correct, Picatinny rings will NOT fit Weaver bases. (the cross slot in the bases are too small, i.e..180", vs. .206" cross bar in the rings)

Weaver rings, WILL fit Picatinny bases, but the cross slot is much wider in the bases than the width of the cross bar in the rings. You will have .026" of "slop" in the fit, so the rigidity advantage of the Weaver rings is lost.

One of the posters pointed out that Burris's Extreme Tactical rings, are in fact Weaver specs, and will "fit" on Picatinny bases, but with the aforementioned "slop".


Midway's catalog lists "true" Picatinny rings, all are $$$$ compared to most Weaver rings (save the Burris exception, which are NOT true Picatinny dimensions).

So, we have to pay triple for Picatinny rings, or tolerate a sloppy fit with Weaver rings, in the Picatinny bases.

Clear as mud yet ?

Does anyone know of reasonably priced Picatinny rings, in the $ 30 range ?
__________________
NRA Instructor
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-16-2010, 01:11 PM
Sven Sven is offline
Member
new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases  
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northern Minnesota
Posts: 711
Likes: 172
Liked 227 Times in 126 Posts
Default

Below should be a link to the Burris 30mm picattiny rings. My catalog showed a price of $49.99, though.

Burris 30mm Xtreme Tactical Picatinny-Style Rings Matte Extra-High Package of 2 - MidwayUSA

I guess I don't know for sure if the Bushnell rings I used are Weaver or not. Probably are. I suppose one way to use the Weaver bases is to mount one forward in the slot and the other rearward in the slot to minimize movement.

I would still like to know ring height recommendations. In reading the reviews of the Burris rings, one guy said the extra high were perfect for his AR15, and another said the mediums fit correctly. Does that mean I should choose plain high??? I'm leaning towards the extra.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-16-2010, 02:11 PM
JohnK JohnK is offline
US Veteran
new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases  
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee., USA
Posts: 749
Likes: 2
Liked 384 Times in 170 Posts
Default

Sven, those rings are for BOTH Picatinney, and Weaver rails, so the cross bar is the smaller of the two (.180").

Again, the dimension "slop".
__________________
NRA Instructor
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-16-2010, 09:36 PM
Sven Sven is offline
Member
new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases new to Picatinny bases  
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northern Minnesota
Posts: 711
Likes: 172
Liked 227 Times in 126 Posts
Default

Funny (or NOT), in the catalog they're listed on the picatinny only page. Now I read the internet page closer, I see the "or Weaver".
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
millet, mp15, scope, tactical, weaver


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Scope Bases sjs S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 11 09-29-2017 09:14 PM
N & X Frame Scope Bases for Picatinny Rail equipped revolvers Aussie460XVR S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 8 10-18-2016 06:37 PM
S&W 22A-1 Magazine bases radar45 Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 2 02-17-2015 04:39 PM
3rd Gen Bases Covered gunblade Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 19 09-05-2014 06:47 PM
647 scope bases old ford S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 3 01-10-2014 01:56 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:42 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)