Plinker1962, congrats on the new M&P 15!
Thanks for the pictures. It's one of the few times I get to see a M&P 15 in its near O.E.M. state.
Barrels chambered in 5.56 can safely fire 5.56 NATO & .223 Remington.
Barrels chambered in .223 can safely fire .223 Remington. They can also fire 5.56, but it's not advisable.
Barrels chambered in .223 Wylde can safely fire 5.56 NATO & .223 Remington.
The key word is "safely". I know a .223 owner who fires 5.56 without issue, yet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMC man
From the articles I have read the shell casing is thicker in the 5.56 rounds but have the same load as the .223 which accounts for the higher pressure in the chamber
|
Yup. GMC Man, I searched for information on this a while ago. I tried to separate internet opinion from fact, and it started to give me a headache. These are the details that were consistent.
There is a difference in the chamber leade between a .223 and a 5.56 barrel that contributes to the pressure difference.
5.56 Chamber Leade > .223 Chamber Leade
A .223 round has less distance to travel before it contacts the barrel's rifling. This is part of the reason why .223 Remington is not as hot of a load as 5.56 NATO. The difference in chamber leade is also why a rifle chambered in .223 holds greater potential for accuracy than a rifle chambered in 5.56.
The tighter tolerance civilian .223 has a greater potential for being ammo sensitive. Not a big deal in a civilian rifle not intended for combat duty.
A 5.56 round has more distance to travel before it contacts the barrel's rifling. This is part of the reason 5.56 NATO is a hotter round than .223 Remington. The difference in chamber leade is why 5.56 holds less potential for accuracy than a rifle chambered in 5.56.
The minutely looser chamber tolerance 5.56 has less potential for being ammo sensitive. This is a good thing in a rifle intended for combat duty.
As for the cases being materially different: slightly longer, case wall thickness, etc, I've never been able to pin that one down.
I don't reload, but I try and pay attention to some reloading sub-forums. I generally see reloading advice that advises to reload .223/5.56 brass to .223 spec because:
1. Without a clear case head stamp, it's impossible to discern the difference between a .223 & 5.56 case. Better to be safe than sorry.
2. Even if they had verifiable 5.56 brass, I see complaints that some reloading manuals don't list 5.56 load data.
This is the point where I stopped researching the difference.