Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Rifles and Shotguns > Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles
o

Notices

Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles Dedicated to the Smith & Wesson M&P-15 Rifles


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-13-2016, 06:41 AM
Wtex Wtex is offline
Member
S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2  
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: West Texas
Posts: 118
Likes: 11
Liked 23 Times in 19 Posts
Default S&W sport vs sport 2

I apologize if this topic has been covered a hundred times, I tried the search feature and didn't find anything on it. Other than a different barrel, a dust cover and FA, are these basically the same rifle?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-13-2016, 08:17 AM
cyphertext cyphertext is offline
US Veteran
S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2  
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Wylie, TX
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 1,075
Liked 3,823 Times in 2,040 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wtex View Post
I apologize if this topic has been covered a hundred times, I tried the search feature and didn't find anything on it. Other than a different barrel, a dust cover and FA, are these basically the same rifle?
The original Sport came with a 1:8 twist, 5R rifles barrel and a fixed rear sight. The second generation Sport traded the fixed sight for a Magpul folding rear sight. The third generation replaced the 1:8 twist barrel with a 1:9 twist barrel.

The current Sport II is the same as the third generation Sport, with the addition of the forward assist and dust cover.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 08-13-2016, 08:45 AM
JaPes's Avatar
JaPes JaPes is offline
Member
S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NW Suburbs, Illinois
Posts: 4,013
Likes: 3,272
Liked 3,961 Times in 1,871 Posts
Default

I like to think of the iterations of the semi-slick sided Sport as versions within a generation that kept cutting costs.

Gen1 = No dust cover, no forward assist, A2 chopped rear sight that gave both windage and elevation adjustment, Thompson Center 1:8 5R 1:8 progressive gain twist Melonite treated barrel.

Gen1.1 = Magpul infection.

Gen 1.2 = Went cheap on the barrel because a bean counter finally figured out putting the premium barrel on the entry level rifle hurt profits.

Gen2 = We have to put a full featured upper on the 15 Sport so it can compete with the current crop of entry level rifles: Ruger AR556, Bushmaster, etc...
__________________
-John
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 08-13-2016, 08:58 AM
veeman's Avatar
veeman veeman is offline
Member
S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 50
Likes: 4
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Default

I guess mine is the 3rd generation then.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-13-2016, 01:43 PM
Plazzman's Avatar
Plazzman Plazzman is offline
Member
S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2  
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Northern, MO
Posts: 203
Likes: 215
Liked 88 Times in 59 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyphertext View Post
The original Sport came with a 1:8 twist, 5R rifles barrel and a fixed rear sight. The second generation Sport traded the fixed sight for a Magpul folding rear sight.
That seems strange to me, my 1 Gen Sport came with a Magpul folding rear sight.
__________________
NRA member since 1974
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-13-2016, 01:51 PM
Plazzman's Avatar
Plazzman Plazzman is offline
Member
S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2  
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Northern, MO
Posts: 203
Likes: 215
Liked 88 Times in 59 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JaPes View Post
I like to think of the iterations of the semi-slick sided Sport as versions within a generation that kept cutting costs.

Gen1 = No dust cover, no forward assist, A2 chopped rear sight that gave both windage and elevation adjustment, Thompson Center 1:8 5R 1:8 progressive gain twist Melonite treated barrel.

Gen1.1 = Magpul infection.

Gen 1.2 = Went cheap on the barrel because a bean counter finally figured out putting the premium barrel on the entry level rifle hurt profits.

Gen2 = We have to put a full featured upper on the 15 Sport so it can compete with the current crop of entry level rifles: Ruger AR556, Bushmaster, etc...
Well that is strange, did not know there was 1.1 and 1.2 version of the Sport. Sounds like a computer software version upgrade. Learn something new everyday.
__________________
NRA member since 1974
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-13-2016, 06:43 PM
cyphertext cyphertext is offline
US Veteran
S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2  
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Wylie, TX
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 1,075
Liked 3,823 Times in 2,040 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Plazzman View Post
That seems strange to me, my 1 Gen Sport came with a Magpul folding rear sight.
Japes got it right with the "cost cutting"... it didn't take them very long to replace the fixed A2 style rear sight with the Magpul sight. I believe that the fixed sight was made by LMT, and if I am correct, that was about $130 retail at that time, vs. the $40 Magpul sight.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #8  
Old 08-13-2016, 06:59 PM
JaPes's Avatar
JaPes JaPes is offline
Member
S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NW Suburbs, Illinois
Posts: 4,013
Likes: 3,272
Liked 3,961 Times in 1,871 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyphertext View Post
Japes got it right with the "cost cutting"... it didn't take them very long to replace the fixed A2 style rear sight with the Magpul sight. I believe that the fixed sight was made by LMT, and if I am correct, that was about $130 retail at that time, vs. the $40 Magpul sight.
Bingo. The so-called cheap parts weren't inexpensive at all. They were premium parts that weren't popular with purists. It's been a while, I can't remember who made the upper receivers and lower receivers for S&W back then. Aero Precision?

Back then the Thompson Center 1:8 5R Progressive Gain Twist Melonite Treated barrel was looked down upon by the internet experts. If it wasn't mil-spec, chrome lined, it wasn't good. A few of us went out to the popular AR-15 boards with our info about...
  • Hot Salt Bath Nitiriding: Get the best aspects of both a traditional CRMoV unlined barrel and a chrome lined barrel without paying a penalty.
  • 1:8 twist rate allows a wider use of projectile weights outside of the extremes of weight range.
  • 5R Progressive Gain Twist leads to less deformation of the projectile imparting a greater potential for accuracy over distance.

Then we came here... Bill, Grover, Cyphertext, Rebs, and a few more back in those days... gave Phil such a headache.

The original V1.0 Sport was a crazy good value for the $$$ just for the barrel and rear sight. The bolt carrier had and still has the notches in it for the forward assist. Some guys disassembled the upper receiver and swapped the parts out to a full featured upper receiver. They also bought heat shielded standard handguard takeoffs from other people's builds.
__________________
-John

Last edited by JaPes; 08-13-2016 at 07:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-13-2016, 07:20 PM
cyphertext cyphertext is offline
US Veteran
S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2  
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Wylie, TX
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 1,075
Liked 3,823 Times in 2,040 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JaPes View Post
It's been a while, I can't remember who made the upper receivers and lower receivers for S&W back then. Aero Precision?
I remember when we all saw the marketing video where the S&W rep stated that the uppers and lowers were forged in house... so then why did my Sport have Anchor Harvey forge markings on it?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 08-14-2016, 12:50 AM
Wtex Wtex is offline
Member
S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2  
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: West Texas
Posts: 118
Likes: 11
Liked 23 Times in 19 Posts
Default

Have an early Sport and have really enjoyed it, considering picking up a Sport 2. Thanks for all the info!

Last edited by Wtex; 08-15-2016 at 02:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-13-2020, 01:21 PM
nimrod3316's Avatar
nimrod3316 nimrod3316 is offline
US Veteran
S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2  
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Clearfield, Pa.
Posts: 34
Likes: 90
Liked 30 Times in 20 Posts
Post MP Sport

I can't imagine a AR with out a FA and Dust cover needed or not.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-13-2020, 01:52 PM
1sailor 1sailor is offline
Member
S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South Oregon Coast
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 89
Liked 1,648 Times in 584 Posts
Default

I agree. We should always put un-necessary things on our firearms otherwise, they just won't be cool.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #13  
Old 09-13-2020, 01:54 PM
Ruger Nut's Avatar
Ruger Nut Ruger Nut is offline
US Veteran
S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Coonass Country, La.
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 231
Liked 601 Times in 362 Posts
Thumbs up

Looking at my records, I purchased a S&W M&P15 in Jan. 2007 for $649.33. It was made by Stag Arms but labeled S&W.
I built 4 AR's between 2008-2016. In June 2016 I bought an AR-556. I built 3 more AR's up until March 2020. I sold my M&P15 to my cousin July 2020. We made a deal, that if he ever wants to sell it I get the 1st chance to buy it back for what I sold it to him for ($700).
__________________
How many guns are too many?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-13-2020, 03:30 PM
cyphertext cyphertext is offline
US Veteran
S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2  
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Wylie, TX
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 1,075
Liked 3,823 Times in 2,040 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruger Nut View Post
Looking at my records, I purchased a S&W M&P15 in Jan. 2007 for $649.33. It was made by Stag Arms but labeled S&W.
I built 4 AR's between 2008-2016. In June 2016 I bought an AR-556. I built 3 more AR's up until March 2020. I sold my M&P15 to my cousin July 2020. We made a deal, that if he ever wants to sell it I get the 1st chance to buy it back for what I sold it to him for ($700).
That M&P 15 you bought in 2007 wasn't a Sport or a Sport 2. Those were pretty decent AR's, checked a lot of the boxes on "the chart" back then.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-13-2020, 03:35 PM
Ruger Nut's Avatar
Ruger Nut Ruger Nut is offline
US Veteran
S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Coonass Country, La.
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 231
Liked 601 Times in 362 Posts
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyphertext View Post
That M&P 15 you bought in 2007 wasn't a Sport or a Sport 2. Those were pretty decent AR's, checked a lot of the boxes on "the chart" back then.
You're correct. That's why I call it an M&P15, it's original title.
__________________
How many guns are too many?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-13-2020, 03:54 PM
cyphertext cyphertext is offline
US Veteran
S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2  
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Wylie, TX
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 1,075
Liked 3,823 Times in 2,040 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruger Nut View Post
You're correct. That's why I call it an M&P15, it's original title.
Ok, just curious why you are posting that in a thread comparing the Sport and the Sport II... And one that is over 4 years old at that?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-13-2020, 05:13 PM
Ruger Nut's Avatar
Ruger Nut Ruger Nut is offline
US Veteran
S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Coonass Country, La.
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 231
Liked 601 Times in 362 Posts
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyphertext View Post
Ok, just curious why you are posting that in a thread comparing the Sport and the Sport II... And one that is over 4 years old at that?
I very rarely come in here. I saw the thread in the main forum and decided to check it out. Is that okay?
Besides, someone had to have brought up a 4 year old post just recently for me to see it in the main forum.
__________________
How many guns are too many?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-13-2020, 07:12 PM
BSA1 BSA1 is offline
Member
S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2  
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 957
Liked 1,555 Times in 680 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nimrod3316 View Post
I can't imagine a AR with out a FA and Dust cover needed or not.
I learned a hard lesson about using the Forward Assist with my first AR-15. I was shooting some ammo that I had previously reloaded for a Mini-14. This ammo always functioned fine in the Mini-14 I had at the time but some of them would not chamber all the way in my AR-15 so I tried to seat the cartridge all the way into the chamber using the Forward Assist. Big mistake. I created the mother of all jams. We liked to never were able to extract that stuck cartridge. As a result of that experience I have never used the Forward Assist since then.

My son who is in the Army tells me he used the Forward Assist during training as the guns they used for training were in well used condition. Just before his unit was deployed to the sandbox last year they were issued new M4’s.

Most of my AR’s have the Forward Assist and Ejection Port Cover simply because it is either because of what my LGS has or because it was on sale.

I am not against Ejection Port Doors. The smooth side Uppers I have brought didn’t come with that option.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-13-2020, 07:26 PM
Ruger Nut's Avatar
Ruger Nut Ruger Nut is offline
US Veteran
S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Coonass Country, La.
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 231
Liked 601 Times in 362 Posts
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by BSA1 View Post
I learned a hard lesson about using the Forward Assist with my first AR-15. I was shooting some ammo that I had previously reloaded for a Mini-14. This ammo always functioned fine in the Mini-14 I had at the time but some of them would not chamber all the way in my AR-15 so I tried to seat the cartridge all the way into the chamber using the Forward Assist. Big mistake. I created the mother of all jams. We liked to never were able to extract that stuck cartridge. As a result of that experience I have never used the Forward Assist since then.

My son who is in the Army tells me he used the Forward Assist during training as the guns they used for training were in well used condition. Just before his unit was deployed to the sandbox last year they were issued new M4’s.


Most of my AR’s have the Forward Assist and Ejection Port Cover simply because it is either because of what my LGS has or because it was on sale.

I am not against Ejection Port Doors. The smooth side Uppers I have brought didn’t come with that option.
I was issued an H&R M16-A1 in basic training. There were a few of us that had an H&R. One soldier was issued a GM M16-A1!
__________________
How many guns are too many?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-14-2020, 02:34 PM
nimrod3316's Avatar
nimrod3316 nimrod3316 is offline
US Veteran
S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2 S&W sport vs sport 2  
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Clearfield, Pa.
Posts: 34
Likes: 90
Liked 30 Times in 20 Posts
Default Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1sailor View Post
I agree. We should always put un-necessary things on our firearms otherwise, they just won't be cool.
Used the original M16 in the 70s they had them. That's what I was referring too.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Deleted Post COSteve Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles 11 08-27-2017 12:05 PM
What do I need to know to buy a Sport II Whitwabit Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles 56 06-18-2016 02:47 PM
M&P 15 Sport ? Com 45acp Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles 6 05-10-2016 12:57 PM
1st mod on my Sport II! Well, after the red dot... Chappy17 Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles 14 05-06-2016 06:45 PM
M&P 15 Sport ? Hog832 Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles 13 10-24-2012 04:35 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)