Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > >


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-06-2017, 11:53 PM
bevans555's Avatar
bevans555 bevans555 is offline
Member
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Posts: 51
Likes: 46
Liked 19 Times in 11 Posts
Default School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights

After researching red dot sights for my M&P Sport 2, I've decided I should also look into variable power scopes. I'm specifically looking at a Vortex Strike Eagle 1-6x24, but would like some general info on these type scopes.


I don't really have a specific use for my AR. I've just always wanted an AR and wanted a rifle that could handle a SHTF scenario. I guess I want my AR to be a worst case scenario back up plan/ fun gun/ jack of all trades.... which I know is asking alot.



I've recently been watching 3 gun youtube vids and noticed guys running 1-6x scopes on their AR's and its got me wondering if something like a 1-6x24 scope like the vortex strike eagle or similar would be the best option for me.... im nearsighted

So, whats the general consensus on small variable power scopes? If left on the 1x setting is target aquisition fairly quick? How's the eye relief on these? Is the proper technique still both eyes open? Any info regarding small variable power scopes vs red dots would be greatly appreciated.

Last edited by bevans555; 05-07-2017 at 01:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-07-2017, 04:32 AM
Kodiakco's Avatar
Kodiakco Kodiakco is online now
Member
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 528
Likes: 50
Liked 401 Times in 187 Posts
Default

Vortex has also just came out with a 1-8x Strike Eagle! I currently have a 1-6x Strike Eagle on my AR. The biggest difference I've found is the weight. Due to their simplicity, red dots are much lighter. At my age and declining vision I really appreciate the variable nature of the 1-6x scope. The reticle is a little busier that a red dot with ranging and windage hold off marks. I shoot local 3-gun and prefer the Strike Eagle over a red dot. Another advantage to the scope is that a battery is not necessary for daylight operation. Most if not all lower cost red dots require a power source. Hope this helps.



Sent from my SM-T377V using Tapatalk
__________________
Improvise, Adapt, Overcome

Last edited by Kodiakco; 05-07-2017 at 04:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 05-07-2017, 08:35 AM
jagular's Avatar
jagular jagular is offline
Member
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 410
Likes: 54
Liked 210 Times in 134 Posts
Default

Even with SHTF you need to plan for the most likely scenario. Are you gonna be running around the wastelands picking people off at hundreds of yards or are you gonna be held up in your house defending at your doorstep? That's a whole other thread but you get the idea. If shooting minute of man accuracy at 200 yards is good enough the go the red dot route. If you want to punch smaller holes go with a 1-6 or even 3-9. 3-gun setups aren't necessarily practical for home defense. They're built that way for a specific purpose where the primary goal is speed and target acquisition at a certain distance.

What I would do...get the red dot as that will cover most of your bases (unless you want to be a super duper sniper) and then build another upper that is more so for precision. Then, when the zombies attack, you have your bases covered.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 05-07-2017, 09:02 AM
ChattanoogaPhil's Avatar
ChattanoogaPhil ChattanoogaPhil is offline
Moderator
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,270
Likes: 7,387
Liked 19,101 Times in 5,624 Posts
Default

1x red dot does a couple things real well. Provides fast target acquisition via unlimited eye relief and field of view as well as relief for aged eyes that struggle with irons in an environment where non magnified shooting is preferred. Small footprint and light weight. A magnified optic does everything else better. Target identification, precise aiming, ranging, holdover... and while not quite as fast as a 1x red dot, is still fast when magnification is on lowest setting. And of course a magnified optic is great for aged eyes. So really, the advantages of a 1x red dot are pretty narrow.

For those like the OP who aren't sure which way to go... I'd suggest a low power variable magnification scope 1-4x or 6 is a good general purpose optic to choose.

For me... I practice shooting offhand at steel targets from 50 to 200yds. My rifle is designated for self defense. So... light weight, fast target acquisition and reliability were the overriding criteria. 1x red dot -- Aimpoint Micro

If I were to go with a magnified optic I really like the Leupold VX R Patrol 1.25-4x with the FireDot reticle. I'd use a one piece mount.


Last edited by ChattanoogaPhil; 05-07-2017 at 10:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 05-07-2017, 04:02 PM
hdrolling's Avatar
hdrolling hdrolling is offline
US Veteran
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Grays Creek, NC
Posts: 226
Likes: 16
Liked 119 Times in 75 Posts
Default

There is always the more expensive way, Save up and try them all. Until you try you're not going to be 100% sure what you want.

And after you get what you want you might not like it after you try it at the range, or vise versa.

My Vortex scope has a QD mount that holds a zero very well after removing and replacing the scope on and off the rifle.

So in the past Ive kept the scope off and used a red dot for the first 5 mags at the 25-50 yd range. Then I'll put the scope on and move over to the 100-200yd range and shoot another 5 mags.

Yesterday at the range I left the scope and offset irons on my DD, left the Eotech and G33 magnifier on my BCM. On my Sport II I started with the Nikon and then installed the Aimpoint PRO and then installed the SPARC AR. It was a good day!

__________________
M&P15 sport II, Retired Army

Last edited by hdrolling; 05-07-2017 at 04:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 05-07-2017, 04:45 PM
C J C J is offline
Member
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 655
Likes: 176
Liked 319 Times in 191 Posts
Default

Quote:
unless you want to be a super duper sniper
Those wishing to become a "super duper sniper" should consider another platform IMO. You can pretty well with an AR. You can do great with a bol action rifle or possibly a really good semi-auto. But for the most part long range shooting is done with bolt action rifles. I realize a person can build an AR to shoot long distances but it will cost far more than a bolt action that will shoot the same distance.

There used to be a 500 yard range at the gun club I was in. I went there to shoot pretty often. I shot quite a few AR's including some AR-10's at that range. I also shot my Savage 12 LRPV .223. I could generally shoot minute of man with the AR's including the 10. I shot 5" groups with the LRPV. And the wind affected the accuracy. With a .308 rifle of the same design or similar it should be possible to cut down that 5" group size.

I love my AR. It's a great rifle in many ways including accuracy. But it doesn't compare to a purpose built long range rifle in terms of accuracy at 500 yards.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #7  
Old 05-07-2017, 07:39 PM
rockquarry rockquarry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 2
Liked 656 Times in 387 Posts
Default

bevans555-
We all have different needs and wants and I respect the viewpoints of those who have formed educated opinions based on adequate experience. You mention low powered small variables. I've had success with a Leupold Mark AR Mod 1 1.5-4x20 using a Leupold integral mounting system on an AR. The scope has the very plain but quite functional duplex reticle.

I find this setup lacking in no way for general target shooting from the bench or offhand up to 200 yards. I seldom have an opportunity to shoot beyond that distance. Never had a red dot sight or seen a need for one, or anything on a gun that requires batteries. I see no use for cluttered reticles. But if a true pro says these are best for specialized applications, that's probably very good information, far better than my opinion. I am not a competitor.

I don't quite understand constant reference to guns intended for use in situations of total civil disorder or end-of-the-world crises. We should all be reasonably prepared but there is a big difference between that and a paranoid obsession.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 05-07-2017, 08:24 PM
WR Moore WR Moore is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,742
Likes: 62
Liked 891 Times in 527 Posts
Default

As Phil notes above, the variable scope has some good points. Especially in locating targets somewhat distant. I"m debating such a purchase now. I love my Aimpoint PRO, but you can't hit what you can't see.

However, the issue is in finding a scope with features appropriate to the platform and cartridge. For instance, you really don't need:
instantly adjustable windage & elevation dials and reticules with hold over markers to multi-hundred yard distances.

The .223/5.56 mm cartridge is basically a 200-250 yard cartridge. If you zero the rifle at 50 yards/meters it won't be more than 2.5 inches above or below the sight line out to almost 250 yards. So protected adjustment dials are a good idea-otherwise adjustments may get moved by contact with gear/obstacles/idiots.

Now, can you hit a distances beyond 250 yards? Sure, but the wind drift of 55-60 grain bullets at a distance can be mind boggling. If you just gotta, work out your trajectory tables and hold high to match.

You mention 3 gun matches, remember that's a sport, not some reflection of reality. Also, that competitors would sacrifice their virgin daughters to gain a competitive advantage-either real or imagined. Trust me, a lot of gear gets sold that provides only an imaginary effect.

Last edited by WR Moore; 05-07-2017 at 08:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 05-07-2017, 09:39 PM
Kodiakco's Avatar
Kodiakco Kodiakco is online now
Member
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 528
Likes: 50
Liked 401 Times in 187 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WR Moore View Post
As Phil notes above, the variable scope has some good points. Especially in locating targets somewhat distant. I"m debating such a purchase now. I love my Aimpoint PRO, but you can't hit what you can't see.

However, the issue is in finding a scope with features appropriate to the platform and cartridge. For instance, you really don't need:
instantly adjustable windage & elevation dials and reticules with hold over markers to multi-hundred yard distances...
You are way to narrow minded. Especially when it comes to competition and what someone needs. Sure, you can give your opinion but "need" is relative. Maybe YOU don't need variable optics or hold over/windage marks, that doesn't mean others don't or would not benefit from them.

As far as competition goes, I have not, as of yet, sold my children or wife for a competitive edge. I can tell you I'm a much better shooter than I was 2 years ago. Shooting while moving, transitioning from one weapon to another, reloading on the move, keeping track of shots fired, etc. These are a few of the things I have improved on while competing in 3 gun and action shooting. I'll also mention the friends I've made and the better shooters who I've learned from.

ETA: NRA High power rifle is shot out to 500-600 yards.

Quote:
The rifles currently defined as "Service Rifles" include the M1, M14, M16 and their commercial equivalents

Courses of Fire
There are 4 strings of fire which are the basic building blocks of any NRA high power rifle course of fire or tournament. These are:

1. Slow Fire, standing - 10 rounds at 200 yards in 10 minutes.
2. Rapid Fire, sitting or kneeling - 10 rounds at 200 yards in 60 seconds.
3. Rapid Fire, 10 rounds prone - 300 yards in 70 seconds.
4. Slow Fire, 10 rounds prone - 500 or 600 yards in 10 minutes.
Sent from my SM-T377V using Tapatalk
__________________
Improvise, Adapt, Overcome

Last edited by Kodiakco; 05-07-2017 at 10:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 05-08-2017, 12:37 AM
shep854's Avatar
shep854 shep854 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Birmingham AL
Posts: 436
Likes: 214
Liked 168 Times in 90 Posts
Default

What about a third option--a low power fixed (3 or 4x) magnification scope? Smaller, lighter, simpler and less expensive, it will still aid in target location and aiming to medium range, yet allow target pick-up at close range.
__________________
Registration? NEVER!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 05-08-2017, 05:44 AM
C J C J is offline
Member
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 655
Likes: 176
Liked 319 Times in 191 Posts
Default

Quote:
The .223/5.56 mm cartridge is basically a 200-250 yard cartridge.
I can't agree with this. I've seen 18" groups shot at 1000 yards at Camp Perry that were shot by a teenager. He won the youth competition there and there is plenty of wind there. The cartridge was designed to be effective at 600 yards according to everything I've ever read. And my own experience is that you can shoot pretty effectively at 500 yards with a .223. I have a bolt action rifle that shot this target and this is pretty typical of what it does at 500 yards. Unfortuantely I don't get to shoot many actual targets at that distance because of having to go down the range to put up a target which means shutting things down for everyone else while you drive down the range and back. Plus there's a blind spot where people can't see you and someone may not know your there. So I shoot stuff people have left standing usually. Anyway this rock is about 2" thick. Someone painted spots on it about 5" in diameter. I only shot at one of them. The rifle shot through the rock where I was aiming. The space you see in the target was once another blue spot. I shot it out completely with about 10 rounds. Notice there are no holes around the spot I was shooting at. This is pretty typical of the results I get at that range and it's plenty windy there. It's on top of a strip mined hill and there's nothing to slow down the wind there. There are other bullet holes in the rock but I didn't shoot them. One of the other spots is circled to show what I shot out. The other circle shows where the other spot was. Keep in mind that the spot was pretty easy to hit when I first shot it. But knocking off those last pieces of paint wasn't quite so easy. The last shots had to be put in an area about 1" in size.


Last edited by C J; 05-08-2017 at 05:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #12  
Old 05-08-2017, 07:37 AM
vonn's Avatar
vonn vonn is offline
US Veteran
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: houston,texas
Posts: 4,932
Likes: 75,188
Liked 17,129 Times in 3,908 Posts
Default

Stretching out your practice to longer ranges will make you become a better shooter because all of your mistakes will be magnified and show you problems that going back to the basics can help you solve.
__________________
Hue 68 noli me tangere
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-08-2017, 10:20 AM
ChattanoogaPhil's Avatar
ChattanoogaPhil ChattanoogaPhil is offline
Moderator
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,270
Likes: 7,387
Liked 19,101 Times in 5,624 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C J View Post
I can't agree with this. I've seen 18" groups shot at 1000 yards at Camp Perry that were shot by a teenager. He won the youth competition there and there is plenty of wind there. The cartridge was designed to be effective at 600 yards according to everything I've ever read.
Effective is about the equipment and intended purpose. My rifle is designated for SD.

I use Fed M855. I chose it for close range light barrier penetration characteristics, it's widely available and relatively inexpensive for practice. Those are my criteria. Rated muzzle velocity is 3020fps from a 20in barrel.

I use a 16in 1-7 barrel that delivers a 2928fps avg muzzle velocity measured with my chronograph. Lethal wound channel with M855 is claimed to be at or above 2500fps from some sources I've read.

From my rifle, M855 is traveling 2500fps at 150yds. With my 1x red dot I'm good for point and click shooting to about 200yds. It's about 2-3moa ammo. So everything is in the ballpark for what I'm looking for.

From my rifle, M855 would have a velocity of 1400fps at 600yds, and at 2-3moa would likely miss the threat entirely even in ideal environmental conditions let alone discuss lethality of wound channel. Effective? For what? Of course I could choose a different barrel and different ammo and different optics... on and on... and that gets back to the original point.

Getting back to the subject, how effective would a 10x scope be for my intended purposes and conditions where I live?


Last edited by ChattanoogaPhil; 05-08-2017 at 10:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #14  
Old 05-08-2017, 10:40 AM
LAA LAA is offline
Member
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 457
Likes: 154
Liked 282 Times in 173 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shep854 View Post
What about a third option--a low power fixed (3 or 4x) magnification scope? Smaller, lighter, simpler and less expensive, it will still aid in target location and aiming to medium range, yet allow target pick-up at close range.
I used a Vortex 3X with my Aimpoint Pro. I've since sold that AR. My wife's AR 15 has a Burris 3X with the Vortex Sparc AR. The 300 Blackout AR I'm shooting these days, has a variable power scope.

We are not into shooting 300-600 yrds with these rifles. I think the magnifiers are excellent for shots at 100 yrds, and very cost effective.

There are the purists out there, who think magnifiers belong in the junk box. Some are very vocal about that. As to myself, I don't get a kick out of shooting ARs for long distances.

If I do build another AR, it will most likely be an Aimpoint Pro & a magnifier again.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 05-08-2017, 11:30 AM
BAM-BAM BAM-BAM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Western Pa.
Posts: 7,666
Likes: 157
Liked 8,473 Times in 4,061 Posts
Default

I'm in Phil's camp.........

IMHO the answer to all the "what gun" , "what scope", "what optic"...... questions are "Purpose driven".

In Pa you still can't hunt with a semi......... countryside is wooded and rolling...... at the present time I can't think of many justifiable self-defense shootings at ranges in excess of several feet; let alone 200 plus yards. ...... I don't compete anymore (was on the HS and College Rifle Teams).

Any "light sniping" at pesky varmints will be done with my Scoped CZ 527s in .223....... or .243. My scope of choice for the Laurel Highland/Allegheny Mountains where shots over 100yds are the exception and over 200 almost impossible to find; is a 1-4x20 Leupold

So for fun at the range; and if the "S ever does HTF" I'm a red-dot fan..... mine are Aimpoint PROs

Last edited by BAM-BAM; 05-08-2017 at 11:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #16  
Old 05-08-2017, 11:47 AM
apollo99 apollo99 is online now
Member
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 582
Likes: 35
Liked 768 Times in 333 Posts
Default

Reading what the OP is looking for, I would suggest a Red dot, smallest dot in mills ,and a 3X or 4X magnifier. This will give you the short range defensive rifle , and click over the magnifier and you can take shots out 100-200 yards, probably longer. This set up in a quality brand will not be cheap, but it will be something that will be durable and do everything but the longer sniper ranges.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #17  
Old 05-08-2017, 12:06 PM
ISCS Yoda's Avatar
ISCS Yoda ISCS Yoda is offline
US Veteran
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 3,985
Likes: 773
Liked 3,585 Times in 1,642 Posts
Default

Just my two cents. I like variable power scopes for hunting. I like red dots on fighting rifles. It's that simple.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #18  
Old 05-08-2017, 01:01 PM
C J C J is offline
Member
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 655
Likes: 176
Liked 319 Times in 191 Posts
Default

Quote:
Effective is about the equipment and intended purpose. My rifle is designated for SD.
I have a couple of rifles like that. I've had several more over the years. I never meant to say that an AR should have any reason to be fired 600 yards but the military contractors claimed they were effective to that distance from what I've always heard. I don't plan on being in any battle. I have no reason to shoot long distances except for my enjoyment.

My only point was that the .223 is capable of shooting my farther than 250 yards. I responded to what someone else said. FWIW I have seen where people have built AR's to shoot long distances but that would be at the expense of the type of things you mention your AR is for. HD doesn't require a 600 yard rifle. BTW my yard looks just about like what you showed in the photo except the trees have probably shaded out a lot of the smaller stuff now. My house is surrounded by woods in fact. There are very few places around my home where shooting long distance is even possible. That gun range was the only one I had access to and they shut it down because people wouldn't follow the rules there.

Again I never meant to imply that anyone's AR should be a 600 yard rifle but the pitch for the rifle when it was first sold to the military was that it could be effective at 600 yards. You don't get many chances to prove that in my area.

UPDATE:


I did some looking around and found a few things. First this web site claims the effective range of the original 5.56 ammo was 460 meters.

The AR-15/M16: The rifle that was never supposed to be

This one says 500 yards effective range:

The history of the AR-15 - The Washington Post

I know I've seen some that say 600 yards.

Last edited by C J; 05-08-2017 at 01:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #19  
Old 05-08-2017, 01:04 PM
Wanderling Wanderling is offline
Member
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 31
Likes: 4
Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
Default

I wanted to get a red dot but I also wanted to have fun at the range, and having to squint to see the bullseye is not my idea of fun. So I ended up with a 3-9 P223, at 3x I can quickly acquire sights on a clock across the room, so it's still useful at close distance.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #20  
Old 05-08-2017, 02:46 PM
buckyjames1 buckyjames1 is offline
US Veteran
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Virginia Beach Va.
Posts: 219
Likes: 2
Liked 65 Times in 39 Posts
Default

Red Dot or scope each have merit/pros and cons, here is just some food for though:

1. Weight: This is easily over looked, if you intend on lugging it around, a higher powered, bigger lens is going to add up fast. I would absolutely steer you away from a red dot and magnifier combo. I did it and luckily sold it for a loss of about $50, it was just too heavy. Add a light and mount, weight goes up. Want a laser...weight goes up, want a foregrip, it adds weight. Next thing ya know, that 5.56 platform is a heavy Sum.

2. If you go scope, I would recommend either a fixed x4 power or the typical 1-6 or 1-4x variables. 1-6 is arguably all the power you will ever need for practical range capabilities of the 5.56mm.

3. If you go red dot, consider battery life and type of battery AA Aimpoint version are phenomenal, tough, can come in 2MOA now, tough enough for military grunts = tough as nails.

4. Training: If your going to take classes, do snap shots, consider 100yd plenty distance, a red dot might suit ya better. In a SHTF scenario, how many times do you expect to be on a bench or properly resting the rifle in order to hit past 100yd. Chances are encounters will be snap shots or 100yds and less.

*Recommendations: ACOG x4 fixed, Trijicon Accupoint 1-4x, Aimpoint M4 or the micro. IMO the EOTECH was just alittle too busy reticle wise. That glass on the accupoint is a great bargain! If your tastes tend to go higher than above listed...sky is the limit.

*Whatever you decide to buy...Do not go cheap on a mount!

*If you buy a Red dot, you will (at some time) second guess and think..Hmm maybe I shoulda went with a scope. If you bough a scope, (at some time) you will second guess and think..Hmm I think I would like to try a red dot.

Last edited by buckyjames1; 05-08-2017 at 03:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #21  
Old 05-08-2017, 03:20 PM
LAA LAA is offline
Member
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 457
Likes: 154
Liked 282 Times in 173 Posts
Default

Magnifiers can easily be removed, if you're going to be lugging this rifle through dense forest or jungles.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #22  
Old 05-08-2017, 03:32 PM
buckyjames1 buckyjames1 is offline
US Veteran
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Virginia Beach Va.
Posts: 219
Likes: 2
Liked 65 Times in 39 Posts
Default

My set up was the EOTECH with EOTECH magnifier, Just too bulky and although the side flip of the magnifier was nice, it just was clumsy feeling to me. YMMV

1. Trijicon AccuPoint TR24 Rifle Scope 30mm Tube 1-4x 24mm is 14.4oz.

2. EOTech EXPS2-2 Holographic Hybrid Sight II 68 MOA Circle (2) 1 MOA is 22.4oz without battery.

3. Trijicon ACOG TA31 BAC Rifle Scope 4x 32mm Dual-Illuminated Horseshoe 9.9oz no batteries, very bright with the tritium and a nice fiber optic to boot.

Last edited by buckyjames1; 05-08-2017 at 03:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #23  
Old 05-08-2017, 03:47 PM
LAA LAA is offline
Member
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 457
Likes: 154
Liked 282 Times in 173 Posts
Default

A lot of these options are a lot of money, to put on a M&P Sport 2. IMO, for 100 yrd shooting (or less)------ not worth it. We can go crazy with scopes, spotting scopes, red dots, etc. money wise.

Vortex Sparc AR $200.00
Magnifier 200.00
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #24  
Old 05-08-2017, 04:02 PM
rock_castle rock_castle is offline
Member
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 249
Likes: 94
Liked 174 Times in 81 Posts
Default

I began with a red dot on my AR, but after a while I wanted to be able to reach out and touch someone and be able to identify targets at a distance. I ended up with a Strike Eagle which can identify close in targets quickly, yet provide long range accuracy too.
I keep my scope set at 1 (no magnification) when the rifle is in my bedroom closet for home defense. The only negative compared to my red dot is the extra weight. I'm glad I made the change.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #25  
Old 05-08-2017, 08:17 PM
WR Moore WR Moore is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,742
Likes: 62
Liked 891 Times in 527 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodiakco View Post
You are way to narrow minded. Especially when it comes to competition and what someone needs.
Sent from my SM-T377V using Tapatalk
I never said that you can't build basic skills in competition. I've shot-and very occasionally still try to- competition in several varieties. That said, there's a basic truth that one cannot widget oneself to competency/excellence.

Back in the 1980's I built competition 1911s for people who shot IPSC. Beyond the basics, most of the folks would have better spent their money on practice ammo and/or instruction. And I'm not exaggerating about what lengths some folks will do for a competitive advantage. Kudos to you for not going to those lengths.

Yes, you CAN shoot beyond 200-250 yards with a .223. However, you didn't note my comment about wind drift, which is about 4 times as much as with as a .30 round. One can find bullets that closely approximate a good 7.62 match bullet, but that's not what most of us are shooting. And, as Phil noted, the effective range of a .223/5.56 mm is about what I noted. Some competent experts put it much less for defensive use. In fact, one of the driving forces behind military adoption of the 5.56 mm was a series of studies that noted that ~87% of combat casualties were from crew served weapons and that the limit of effective rifle fire by the average infantry person was about 300 yards, perhaps less, in the real world.

I addressed the questions/concerns put by the OP and didn't get into all possible options and I didn't exclude variable scopes. i also spent over 20 years with an AR platform within arms reach if it wasn't hanging on me, this colors my commentary.

Good luck.

Last edited by WR Moore; 05-08-2017 at 08:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #26  
Old 05-09-2017, 06:54 AM
C J C J is offline
Member
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 655
Likes: 176
Liked 319 Times in 191 Posts
Default

Quote:
And, as Phil noted, the effective range of a .223/5.56 mm is about what I noted. Some competent experts put it much less for defensive use.
I guess this would depend on the definition of effective. SD distances are not the same as varmint distances. I probably wouldn't shoot anything alive at 500 yards with a .223 but 400 yards I'd definitely take a shot at a coyote. Again the place I shoot 500 yards has some serious wind and I manage to get rounds on target. I use heavy bullets (75gr) to combat the wind and I spend some time learning how to read the wind. And I'm not using an AR. That's a big reason I can shoot accurate at that distance. I've shot AR's at that distance and they just won't do what a 26" barrel, bolt action rifle designed for long range shooting will do (LRPV = Long Range Precision Varmint). As far as the effective range on the battlefield goes that's beyond my knowledge. My experience is in target shooting and varmint shooting. But just so you know at 300 yards I can shoot very close to 1" groups pretty much all the time and that's with the wind blowing straight in on me which I find to be the hardest type of wind to shoot in.

I do have this target I shot with my LRPV. This is pretty typical for that rifle. It was shot at 125 yards. It was the last 4 shots I took when I was checking the zero on the rifle. Once I got it dialed in (I hadn't shot it for over a year) this is what it did. I really don't have any place to shoot long range anymore since they closed the 500 yard range at the gun club. A friend says he has a spot to shoot 600 yards but right now I live about 120 miles away from him so I haven't made it there yet.



I also looked up some videos on rifles very similar to mine. The first one has a 30" barrel and a different stock (not a better stock) but most of the shooters I've talked to prefer the 26" barrel because it balances better. Anyway the first video shows a .223 shooting 1000 yards.


This video shows the same rifle as mine shooting 450 yards. This is typical for how my rifle shoots.


Again the same rifle as mine this time at 500 yards. First shot was high. My guess is they did some Kentucky windage adjustments for the second shot.


One more. A very similar Savage .223 at 1000 meters.


Last edited by C J; 05-09-2017 at 07:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #27  
Old 05-09-2017, 08:31 AM
ChattanoogaPhil's Avatar
ChattanoogaPhil ChattanoogaPhil is offline
Moderator
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,270
Likes: 7,387
Liked 19,101 Times in 5,624 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAA View Post

There are the purists out there, who think magnifiers belong in the junk box. Some are very vocal about that. As to myself, I don't get a kick out of shooting ARs for long distances.
Not that they necessarily belong in the AR parts box, but it's been my observation that's where magnifiers often end up.

The advantages of a 1x red dot is unlimited field of view and eye relief. With the magnifier in place that's gone. With the magnifier flipped to the side there's all this stuff in the operator's face.

Of course there are folks who find magnifiers useful but I think most folks find a conventional magnified scope or 1x red dot is a better fit than the compromises offered by the red dot/magnifier combo. And that's what I would suggest to someone like the OP curious about which optic to choose. As always, YMMV.

Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #28  
Old 05-09-2017, 09:45 AM
TX-Dennis TX-Dennis is offline
Member
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: West Texas
Posts: 980
Likes: 1,662
Liked 998 Times in 510 Posts
Default

I couldn't decide, so I got both. I have a Nikon P223 3-9 scope on one AR and a Vortex SPARC AR dot on the other. Both are useful. The scope for distances over 100 yards, and the dot for up to 100 yards. The scope is on a Del-Ton. I shoot it at up to 500 meters occasionally, but mostly at 125-200 meters. The dot is on a Sport 2. Both are fun to shoot. Neither is a "precision" rifle.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #29  
Old 05-09-2017, 03:28 PM
C J C J is offline
Member
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 655
Likes: 176
Liked 319 Times in 191 Posts
Default

Quote:
I couldn't decide, so I got both. I have a Nikon P223 3-9 scope on one AR and a Vortex SPARC AR dot on the other. Both are useful.
No doubt both are useful. Both are good quality setups. I've always wished there was a truly good way to have a red dot and a scope on the same rifle. The two you picked are good choices for a combined setup. Maybe I'm biased because I have 2 Nikon ProStaff 3-9X40 scopes I'm using. Mine are earlier models than the P223. I really like those scopes. They are very clear and gather light really well for their price. They aren't Night Force or anything but they do pretty well. I have a Vortex Strikefire II on my AR and I've been very happy with it. I have been tempted to put a Primary Arms Advanced red dot on it because of battery life. I have that sight on a Kel-Tec KSG shotgun but I'm thinking of selling that gun. It's a great weapon but I don't really expect to be in a trench war any time soon. It's a genuine example of overkill IMO. It's fun to have but not really practical. I can't carry it in the truck loaded in my state or that might be a different story.

But your post is correct. Scopes and red dots both have their uses. If I had everything I wanted on one firearm it would likely weigh 40 lb.s though.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-09-2017, 03:46 PM
Disabled1 Disabled1 is offline
Banned
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: South Of The North Pole
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 491
Liked 705 Times in 425 Posts
Thumbs down

Here's a red dot to stay away from.

Unsuitable at Any Range: A Holosun Review - The Firearm BlogThe Firearm Blog
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 05-09-2017, 03:49 PM
PALADIN85020's Avatar
PALADIN85020 PALADIN85020 is offline
US Veteran
School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights School me on variable power scopes vs red dot sights  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 6,480
Likes: 1,135
Liked 19,205 Times in 2,518 Posts
Default

I think it all depends to what use you intend for your rifle. If it's target or varmint shooting, by all means, you want precision crosshair magnifying optics (a scope).

If on the other hand, you want a SHTF protection rifle, the red dot reigns supreme. Normally, ranges will not surpass 200 yards, and could be very close indeed. You will want FAST target acquisition with plenty of peripheral vision. Additional advantages include unlimited eye relief and no worries about parallax errors. Co-witnessed with your iron sights, you can take it off and still be on target. I've equipped my "go to" AR with an Aimpoint with a 4-minute dot and a flip-up backup iron rear sight. Very happy with this arrangement. I have other rifles for precision shots at longer ranges, and of course they are appropriately scoped.

John



__________________
- Cogito, ergo armatum sum -

Last edited by PALADIN85020; 05-09-2017 at 03:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Good Red Dot Sights Or Scopes Dreynols1352 Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 14 05-24-2016 07:15 PM
So, 3x fixed power or 3x9 variable 1sailor Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles 6 08-27-2013 04:53 PM
Barska Scopes and sights JTF Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 8 03-06-2011 12:14 AM
Low Power Scopes Sam McCord The Lounge 24 11-26-2009 02:19 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:28 AM.


S-W Forum, LLC 2000-2015
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)