| |  | 
02-05-2011, 09:31 PM
|  |
Member
| | | Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: usa
Posts: 39
Likes: 5
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
| | SD9 ACCURACY??? wats up team? i want to hear from the SD owners/shooters about the accuracy of the pistol. the wife told me she was getting me a gun for my up coming birthday!  and i think the SD9 is my next addition. i have the sigma 40 and learned to shoot it with pretty good accuracy. but most of us know that it shoots low and adjustments have to be made to get it 'zeored_in'. i know the hiviz upgrade has been successful for the ones that have already tried it. i plan to do it once i get the chance. but i'd like to know if the SD9 is on point or if adjustments are needed like the sigma. also, info on groupings, ammo used, and distance would be awesome as well. thx team! | 
02-05-2011, 10:33 PM
|  |
Member
| | | Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: WA
Posts: 175
Likes: 12
Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
| | Mine was dead on right out of the box. | 
02-06-2011, 08:18 AM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Auburn, AL
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | My sight was 2 feet off at 20 yards out of the box. Few quick adjustments and all was good. I remember the first shot, I was literally like "*** where did it hit?" then saw the puff of dust at the 100 yard bunker... | 
02-07-2011, 05:53 PM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Mine soot POI. No problems with mine. | 
02-09-2011, 09:20 AM
|  |
Member
| | | Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: usa
Posts: 39
Likes: 5
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
| | thx for the feedback! hopefully things go well and i'll have an SD9 in a couple weeks | 
02-09-2011, 10:35 AM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | With the 9mm I noticed it shoots about 4" low at 15 yards when using 115gr, using 124gr it shoots dead on. I now reload my 9mm 115gr and have adjusted my load to shoot point of aim at 15 yards and have great results. I was shooting whatever cheap ammo I could get my hands on before reloading and now load and shoot far more often. | 
02-09-2011, 09:10 PM
|  |
Member
| | | Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Green, Ohio
Posts: 223
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Backon4 With the 9mm I noticed it shoots about 4" low at 15 yards when using 115gr, using 124gr it shoots dead on. | Accuracy and velocity are relative
__________________ sw9ve, 24/7 pro Ds, Hs M4 | 
02-14-2011, 08:48 PM
| |
Junior Member
| | | Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: michigan
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | mine shoots 2" low at 10 yrds. groups nice, just low. | 
02-26-2011, 07:00 PM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | mine shoots 2" to the left and it is also low with 115 grain ammo. forget using a laser sight since the frame is not centered with the slide. Major defect that S&W refuses to admit. It is even on their website when you view the 360 degree image of the SD 9.
Here is the link and see yourself: Product: Model SD9 Pistol - Std Capacity | 
02-28-2011, 09:42 PM
|  |
Member
| | | Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: usa
Posts: 39
Likes: 5
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Hosa32726 forget using a laser sight since the frame is not centered with the slide. | wow! wouldn't that cause the barrel to be off centered as well? could that be the reason for the slight inaccuracy? | 
03-01-2011, 08:46 AM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 288
Likes: 4
Liked 19 Times in 16 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by zeroed_in wow! wouldn't that cause the barrel to be off centered as well? could that be the reason for the slight inaccuracy? | Only if your sights are on the frame.... | 
03-01-2011, 10:03 AM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,325
Likes: 214
Liked 297 Times in 201 Posts
| | There are some serious misunderstandings about laser sights going around.
First, none of the lasers can be mounted coaxially with the barrel (looking down the barrel), so there is always parallax error between the laser path and the bullet trajectory. It makes no difference whether the laser is mounted below, to the side, or a little of both: there is only one point where the two paths intersect.
When adjusting the laser, there are two common choices:
1. Pick a distance and sight the laser to POI at that distance. There will be an error at all other distances, and the error will increase with range.
2. Adjust the laser so its path is essentially parallel to the bullet trajectory at short to medium range. There will be an error at all practical ranges about equal to the distance between the bore axis and the laser. Although this sounds worse, many find it easier and more predictable in use.
The preferred place optically for mounting the laser is on top of the slide, but that would take away the iron sights, which are needed when the laser quits.
__________________ NRA/ OK CHL Instructor | 
03-01-2011, 11:57 AM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | I see a lot of people using method 2, Knowing you will hit 1" high at any distance is a lot easier than trying to set it at say 15 yards and then remember where you will be high or low.
Also whether the slide is "off" or not is irrelevant because you adjust the laser to POI. It has nothing to do with the slide or barrel. It is set to where it impacts. | 
03-01-2011, 12:42 PM
|  |
Member
| | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: NW Montana
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | If I were to use a laser in would not be a rail type, but a guide rod type from LaserMax Hi-Brite Internal Guide Rod Laserm. But they only make these for the S&W M&P fullsize and a few other handgun companies. But if you got to have your extra toys, find one that adjust both vertical and horizontal, just never needed one myself.
__________________ SD9, 637 | 
03-02-2011, 09:03 PM
|  |
Member
| | | Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 269
Likes: 25
Liked 18 Times in 16 Posts
| | Speaking of accuracy... just installed a Warren plain tactical sight on my SD9. It is a one to one replacement for the S&W sight.
The Warren tactical sight is all black (no white dots) and has a U shaped opening that is a little bigger than standard and the sides have a curved design -- all of which (theoretically) combines to make your eye move to the front sight very naturally and quickly. This should work well with the SD front sight, which is a bright tritium/white-ringed dot.
So far, dry-firing, I like it. We'll see how it works on the range.
Last edited by S&W Rover; 03-02-2011 at 09:07 PM.
| 
03-05-2012, 06:40 PM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Hosa32726 mine shoots 2" to the left and it is also low with 115 grain ammo. forget using a laser sight since the frame is not centered with the slide. Major defect that S&W refuses to admit. It is even on their website when you view the 360 degree image of the SD 9.
Here is the link and see yourself: Product: Model SD9 Pistol - Std Capacity | Your Right!! I just found this forum. I just bought the SD9. Mine is like that too and a youtube reviewer complained about that also. I did a google search for this issue and found the forum. This is my first post. I also have a new Model 442-2 revolver. I do like the feel of this SD9 over my Glock19 though | 
03-05-2012, 10:00 PM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: NY
Posts: 19
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
| | Love my SD40. By far favorite handgun I own. no mods. POI | 
03-06-2012, 11:26 AM
|  |
Member
| | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Central Missouri
Posts: 894
Likes: 54
Liked 75 Times in 46 Posts
| | Both of my .40 caliber Sigma's shot to POA right out of the box. I'm not sure where the idea that they "shoot low and adjustments have to be made to get it 'zeroed_in'" comes from. As to the SD, I don't own one so I can't provide an opinion on those.
__________________ NRA Pistol,PPITH,PPOTH&TASER | 
03-06-2012, 11:37 AM
|  |
Member
| | | Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: People's Republic of NJ
Posts: 841
Likes: 8
Liked 71 Times in 56 Posts
| | Most likely because they are sighting with a 6 o'clock hold, not a combat hold which is what the sights are set for. | 
03-06-2012, 01:09 PM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 342
Likes: 70
Liked 60 Times in 45 Posts
| | My SD was POA right of of the box. With that being said, the trigger on the SD took alot of getting used to. Defenitely not the 1911 I was used to shooting. I don't know if it was the hinged trigger, the longer pull, or 8 1/2 pound pull. Probably a combination of the three. If I find myself slacking on mechanics I group the shots low and to the left even with a slow and steady trigger pull. Not too bad, just not dead on. I've seen the chart that supposed to help you out in fixing whatever is wrong but I've never found it to be very much help. When i concentrate, it's dead on. | 
03-06-2012, 04:41 PM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Texas
Posts: 551
Likes: 17
Liked 62 Times in 44 Posts
| | The accuracy thing cracks me up sometimes with people claiming gun X shoots low and left or high and right. I promise if if bolt that gun to a bench it will be very accurate as long as the barrel is straight. Most claims of a gun not being accurate are due to poor trigger control/poor grip or not a clear understanding of how the sights are set up. | 
03-07-2012, 05:54 AM
|  |
US Veteran
| | | Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Nowhereville, USA
Posts: 747
Likes: 138
Liked 292 Times in 180 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by StuperDan Mine was dead on right out of the box. | Ditto! mine does too ! | 
03-08-2012, 03:14 PM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 594
Likes: 14
Liked 62 Times in 44 Posts
| | Mine too, it's better'n me. | 
03-08-2012, 03:23 PM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Central Florida
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Liked 38 Times in 27 Posts
| | I got a SD40 for my wife and M&P40 for myself. I shot mine first from about 25yrd and had good grouping just a little down to the left. Then I shot the SD and was way off to the right, from same distance and same hold. In another thread I posted it was stated it was probably due to the trigger pull being so different the M&P and the distance I was shooting from. Now that I have found this wonderful place, I plan on using what I have learned this weekend and go shoot again. I will be posting pics and report after, now that I have been schooled a little. Still love the gun and glad I bought it, I just need to learn how to shoot. | 
03-15-2012, 02:54 AM
|  |
Member
| | | Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 61
Likes: 8
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
| | Out of the box...
At 5 yards I can hit the same holes almost over and over again.
At 7 yards I can hit the same spot most of the time.
At 10 yards I hit dead center with a tight grouping <1in
At 15 yards still hitting dead center with tight grouping 1 - 3in.
At 20 yards hitting a little low (<1in) with tight grouping 1 - 5in.
At 25 yards hitting lower (2 - 3in) with decent grouping
I blame some of the low shots on me anticipating recoil. Although I've almost fully fixed my own error, it shows more at longer distances.
I'm using 9mm 115gr federal classic rounds. |  | | Tags | 1911, 442, hiviz, lasermax, sd40, sd9, sigma, smith & wesson, smith and wesson, tactical, tritium  | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| | | | Smith & Wesson SD & Sigma Pistols Thread, SD9 ACCURACY??? in Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols; wats up team? i want to hear from the SD owners/shooters about the accuracy of the pistol. the wife told ...
Similar Threads | | Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | | The Accuracy of a K 22 | NE450No2 | S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 | 33 | 09-30-2012 05:33 PM | | 22A and accuracy | POTS | Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols | 2 | 10-07-2011 03:31 AM | | S&W PC 945 accuracy | Stefano | Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols | 3 | 03-20-2010 03:43 AM | | Accuracy from a 642! | drew-67 | S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present | 5 | 12-10-2009 06:37 PM | | New 686 Accuracy? | rflumere | S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present | 12 | 06-16-2009 08:45 AM | |