1911 parts are effectively a flat spring with a hook on the end, while a Sigma extractor is rigid and pivots via clearance and is powered by a seperate coil spring and plunger....much of the Sigma and Glock and etc is either a stamping, casting or MIM, which is why they cost only $100 or less to make, aside from the obvious plastic...
This is an application where the more porous MIM or cast part should work fine, and a few posts out of all the Sigmas sold does not make a trend....neither do a few broken strikers......IF there is a trend, the part is either poorly designed or poorly executed, such as heat treated....which will vary to one degree or another by batch, the only thing that matters to QC is the statistical mean in the larger view....so, IF you and a couple of other guys get one from a batch too brittle, rest assured also a couple of guys will get one from a batch too soft, while most will be just fine...
I would wonder whether opening up a 9mm extractor might cause problems with a .40, the only problem with that line of inquiry being the Sigma was conceived and designed to be a .40 from the start when Glock's was having serious issues with kabooms from too slobbo a chamber and case reveal at the ramp.
|