S&W Forum  
Automatic Translations (Powered by Powered by Google):
Afrikaans Albanian Arabic Belarusian Bulgarian Catalan Chinese Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Estonian Filipino Finnish French Galician German Greek Hebrew Hindi Hungarian Icelandic Indonesian Irish Italian Japanese Korean Latvian Lithuanian Macedonian Malay Maltese Norwegian Persian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swahili Swedish Taiwanese Thai Turkish Ukrainian Vietnamese Welsh Yiddish

Go Back   S&W Forum > Main > Smith & Wesson Semi-auto Pistols
Register Expert Commentary Members List EnglishTranslations


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-03-2009, 05:26 PM
novalty's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 117
Default Advantages of TSW over Standard

I have been looking for a 45 for just plinking/home defense. Are the TSW models really that much greater than the standard models? I have seen both posted, and besides the rail, I can't tell any other differences. TIA
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-03-2009, 07:19 PM
RogueJSK's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Northwest Arkansas
Posts: 82
Default

It's my understanding that the TSW versions were made to be somewhat higher quality and a bit more refined than their predecessors. Similar to the many of the differences between the standard and Police/Wingmaster Remington shotguns.

Of course, that may just be S&W's marketing tactics talking.

There are some noticable differences besides the accessory rail, though. The frame rails are different (more robust, with tighter tolerances), and they feature a delayed-unlocking firing system, both of which supposedly gives them a slight edge in accuracy and reliability.

Last edited by RogueJSK; 11-03-2009 at 07:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-03-2009, 07:31 PM
SWCA Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CT USA
Posts: 277
Default

In addition the things already mentioned, they also have more agressive checkering of the front strap and a beefier frame.
__________________
Pete T.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-03-2009, 08:47 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Roebling, NJ, USA
Posts: 246
Default

The slides and frames are also hand matched for tighter tolerances, with assembly number etched on the inside. The rails are also full length, in the box style, to include the dust cover.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-04-2009, 08:46 AM
novalty's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 117
Default

So with the choice of both a standard and TSW model in very similiar condition, the TSW would seem to be a much better choice overall.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-04-2009, 09:23 AM
RogueJSK's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Northwest Arkansas
Posts: 82
Default

I wouldn't necessarily say *much* better. If all else is the same (condition, price, etc.) then sure, go with the TSW. But I wouldn't hesitate to snag a standard 3rd Gen at a lower price or in better condition. Both will still be supremely reliable and as accurate as your shooting skills allow.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-04-2009, 09:35 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Roebling, NJ, USA
Posts: 246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by novalty View Post
So with the choice of both a standard and TSW model in very similiar condition, the TSW would seem to be a much better choice overall.

The TSW represents a better "design" overall, but pistols need to be evaulated on an individual basis. I've got pre-TSW pistols with an incredibly tight lock-up, and I've handled some TSW trade-ins with mismatched slides and a sloppy fit.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-04-2009, 09:58 AM
novalty's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 117
Default

Well, the 2 I am looking at the standard is basically new, the TSW has an unknown round count but in good condition. Both have box, papers, and mags, but the standard model is about $25 more. The things I notice different on the TSW are the decocker only and bobbed hammer. Whereas, the standard is almost identical to my 5906.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-04-2009, 03:20 PM
3rd Gen Neal's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 336
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RogueJSK View Post
I wouldn't necessarily say *much* better. If all else is the same (condition, price, etc.) then sure, go with the TSW. But I wouldn't hesitate to snag a standard 3rd Gen at a lower price or in better condition. Both will still be supremely reliable and as accurate as your shooting skills allow.
+1 on that. My 4566 non tsw has never had any issues and it's more accurate than it's owner. And I'm not overly crazy about the rail, looks like a scab-on. (Because it is)
__________________
Let go...Let Gun
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-04-2009, 04:29 PM
novalty's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 117
Default

I'm up in the air about the rail, originally thought it would be a nice addition if I wanted to add a flashlight for home-defense, but that is why I have my 5906 with Crimson Trace lasergrips. The big differences in the 2 I am looking at, is the "decocker only" and the bobbed hammer on the TSW. Just not very familiar with either one of those features, am used to the decocker/safety on my 5906 and having a spurred hammer. I can see where the bobbed hammer would be nice for concealed carry, but I have tried carrying my 5906, and think that a large carry piece like these full-frame S&W is not for me.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
5906, casing, checkering, crimson, remington, wingmaster

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Smith & Wesson Semi-auto Pistols Thread, Advantages of TSW over Standard in Main; I have been looking for a 45 for just plinking/home defense. Are the TSW models really that much greater than ...

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:32 PM.


© S-W Forum, LLC 2004-2009