Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols > Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols

Notices

Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols Other Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols from the 1950's to Present


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-06-2010, 04:33 PM
kbm6893 kbm6893 is offline
SWCA Member
CS quality vs. 3rd Gen? CS quality vs. 3rd Gen?  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,634
Likes: 638
Liked 6,872 Times in 2,546 Posts
Default CS quality vs. 3rd Gen?

Are the CS semi auto pistols (CS9, CS40, CS45) part of the "value line" series that the 908 and 910 are part of? Is a 3rd gen gun like the 3913 of equal value and craftsmanship to a CS9?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-06-2010, 07:25 PM
KurtC KurtC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Roebling, NJ, USA
Posts: 716
Likes: 9
Liked 282 Times in 86 Posts
Default

The CS series is part of the value line, although some did leave the factory with metal sights and other parts.

A 3913 will have more craftsmanship than a CS9, but they perform equally.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-06-2010, 09:33 PM
Hill_Country's Avatar
Hill_Country Hill_Country is offline
Member
CS quality vs. 3rd Gen? CS quality vs. 3rd Gen? CS quality vs. 3rd Gen? CS quality vs. 3rd Gen? CS quality vs. 3rd Gen?  
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: I Can See The Alamo
Posts: 556
Likes: 303
Liked 372 Times in 188 Posts
Default

I must have a different CS9. I have a 908 with a plastic guide rod, disconnector and rear sight and the CS9 has none of those. Also, the CS9 slide is the same shape as the 3913, not the blockier 908 shape. My CS9 doesn't have the grip checkering normally found on the 39xx series.

The CS9 *may* be the value line, but I see more in common with a 39xx than a 908.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-06-2010, 10:22 PM
Cruiser RN's Avatar
Cruiser RN Cruiser RN is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Yonkers,New York
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 13
Liked 90 Times in 46 Posts
Default

I agree.My CS9 also has all metal parts.I put the CS9 and the 3913 side by side and essentially the CS9 is a baby 3913.Because of my small hands the CS9 just fit me better...All the best and God Bless....Mike
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hill_Country View Post
I must have a different CS9. I have a 908 with a plastic guide rod, disconnector and rear sight and the CS9 has none of those. Also, the CS9 slide is the same shape as the 3913, not the blockier 908 shape. My CS9 doesn't have the grip checkering normally found on the 39xx series.

The CS9 *may* be the value line, but I see more in common with a 39xx than a 908.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-07-2010, 09:17 AM
prescobd prescobd is offline
US Veteran
CS quality vs. 3rd Gen? CS quality vs. 3rd Gen?  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 458
Likes: 32
Liked 256 Times in 100 Posts
Default

I'm no expert, but I believe that when the Chief Specials first came out they had plastic sights and possibly other plastic parts. Later S&W changed out the plastic parts with steel parts. My two CS9s and my CS45 all have steel parts.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-07-2010, 12:05 PM
KurtC KurtC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Roebling, NJ, USA
Posts: 716
Likes: 9
Liked 282 Times in 86 Posts
Default

I find most of this strange, since every CS pistol I've owned or handled, even the ones with steel sights, had the slide milled flat on the rear and at the top edges, just like the value series. Not at all like curves on standard 3rd gen models. No frame checkering or serrations, either.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-04-2011, 08:25 PM
XTrooper's Avatar
XTrooper XTrooper is offline
Member
CS quality vs. 3rd Gen? CS quality vs. 3rd Gen? CS quality vs. 3rd Gen? CS quality vs. 3rd Gen? CS quality vs. 3rd Gen?  
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NE PA
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 528
Liked 808 Times in 228 Posts
Default

In 2001, the retail price of the CS40 was $717. That price definitely excludes it from the "Value Line" series.
__________________
Steve
NJ State Trooper (rtd)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-05-2011, 03:34 AM
Fastbolt's Avatar
Fastbolt Fastbolt is offline
Member
CS quality vs. 3rd Gen? CS quality vs. 3rd Gen? CS quality vs. 3rd Gen? CS quality vs. 3rd Gen? CS quality vs. 3rd Gen?  
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: CA Central Coast
Posts: 4,647
Likes: 920
Liked 6,611 Times in 2,198 Posts
Default

I don't recall the Chief's Special model line ever being referred to as being part of the Value Line models.

The earliest TDA (meaning not the DAO versions, of course) CS models came with a single side manual safety of matching finish. They had metal guide rods, although depending on production they could have either plastic or metal guide rod plungers. They also had plastic sights when first introduced.

The later production models came with ambi manual safety assemblies and steel Low Mount 3-dot sights.

The disconnectors were the standard nylon parts used in the rest of the 3rd gen series after their introduction.

The CS series had the original "stepped" frame & slide rails instead of the larger dimension box-type rails incorporated into the TSW models.

I'd have to say the CS series were of the same overall quality as the rest of the standard 3rd gen standard model line, although they naturally had differently shaped & finished slides & frames unique to the CS series, as well as the Hogue grip panels designed for the CS series.
__________________
Ret LE Firearms inst & armorer
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-05-2011, 05:02 AM
KurtC KurtC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Roebling, NJ, USA
Posts: 716
Likes: 9
Liked 282 Times in 86 Posts
Default

The CS9 has a lot more in common with a 908 than a 3913. Most notably the fact they lock up on the barrel hood, instead of a barrel lug on the 3913. There is also the lack of frame serrations and a slide that was shaped with a hatchet.

Mine were early versions with the plastic parts. I also noticed some versions of the value series left the factory with metal parts.

When they first came out, before there was a "D" version, I had a lengthy conversation with the PC to make sure they could convert one to DAO for me. They said no problem, and referred to it as just a mini 457. Of course, back then they did not have an oblong firing pin retainer to fit the hole, so they just milled the safety lever flat, for me to use a sort of locking device.

Last edited by KurtC; 04-05-2011 at 08:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
3913, checkering, cs45, cs9, hogue, lock, serrations

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
S&W quality joe44va The Lounge 6 03-05-2017 01:44 AM
Quality Belt/Holster for a Quality Pistol gabbyh75 Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 6 10-30-2015 02:08 PM
S&W quality spad124 Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles 6 10-11-2014 12:24 AM
WTT a quality S&W handgun for a quality .243 rifle Kaumheimer GUNS - For Sale or Trade 9 03-13-2012 03:52 PM
Quality at S&W Robert B S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 9 01-20-2009 11:32 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)