|
|
01-16-2011, 08:08 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
1911's and California
Hello all, I am new to the forum. I have been researching handguns and have come across this site on occasion while doing so. I recently went to my local gun store and was ready to purchase a brand new S&W model 1911, item#108299. The guy helping me said they didn't have any in stock and went to check if he could order one for me. He said he found one with Davidson's, but couldn't order it because it wasn't on the California approved list. The reasoning, according to him, was that it was because it didn't have the Picatinny rail. I was completely outraged. He showed me an approved model, item# 108293. Other than that he said there was one other S&W 1911 that was CA approved. Both are very nice but not what I wanted. Can anyone give me any advice? Anything I can do? Thank you for your help!
|
01-16-2011, 08:12 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
|
01-16-2011, 08:31 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 4,468
Likes: 3,068
Liked 4,294 Times in 1,610 Posts
|
|
I feel your pain. We have similar "list" restrictions here in MA.
While I suspect the reason the model you want isn't on the Ca list has nothing to do with the "lack of rail", I'm betting ( like us) , there is no legal way around it . ( Other than to wait for updates to the list.)
That said, I see the full sized stainless version is on your list. That gun should be the same minus adjustable sights and blued finish. It would be simple to change out to adjustable sights if that's what you want. As for finish, It's personal but I don't feel the finish on the blued S&W 1911's is that durable anyway. ( My nephew bought one and had holster wear on it after just a few uses. He now regrets his finish choice.) You could always buy the stainless and have it coated if it's a color thing. Personally, I like being able to buff my holster wear/dings out.
__________________
Dave
Last edited by Wee Hooker; 01-16-2011 at 08:34 PM.
|
01-16-2011, 08:40 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I just dont understand why one 1911 would be approved and not another. Is there something I am missing?While researching, I couldnt find any reasoning behind it.
|
01-16-2011, 08:45 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Thank you both for your help! I really had my heart set on that particular model, but what can you do I guess. Do you have any other brands/specific models that I can look in to? Once again thanks for the help.
|
01-16-2011, 08:46 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I just dont understand why one 1911 would be approved and not another. Is there something I am missing?While researching, I couldnt find any reasoning behind it.
|
01-16-2011, 10:15 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 227
Liked 2,397 Times in 1,081 Posts
|
|
Depends on whether the mfg. has submitted a particular model for testing and approval. I understand this is an expensive process.
|
01-16-2011, 10:56 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 4,468
Likes: 3,068
Liked 4,294 Times in 1,610 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by epj
Depends on whether the mfg. has submitted a particular model for testing and approval. I understand this is an expensive process.
|
x2. Not sure how CA does it but in MA, the manufacturer has to submit 10 of each model ( read: finish, barrel length, options etc.) for testing before it has a chance of getting on the list. That can get expensive and takes time to push them through the states limited testing capacity. Usually what happens is that the most popular models/finishes/options go in first .
My guess is the model you want will get on the list eventually but only S&W or the state can say when.
As for other models, you need to watch the list or see your local shop.
Good luck.
p.s. Don't you feel safer knowing you can't get the blue one? :-(
__________________
Dave
|
01-16-2011, 11:02 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: metro Atlanta
Posts: 535
Likes: 21
Liked 45 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Not sure about the particular model you are looking at, but if it doesn't have a firing pin safety, it won't pass the California drop test unless the manufacturer changes out the firing pin (for a lighter firing pin) and/or puts in a stronger firing pin spring. Some manufacturers go through that process for some of their models. Others do not. Some buyers will not purchase a 1911 that originates from California because they don't want those "safety" features. I've also heard of Californians who have been forced to buy a particular model in a particular finish, and then they immediately send it back to the manufacturer for the finish color they prefer. Thankfully I don't live in California.
Last edited by tocohillsguy; 01-16-2011 at 11:09 PM.
|
01-16-2011, 11:21 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wee Hooker
x2. Not sure how CA does it but in MA, the manufacturer has to submit 10 of each model ( read: finish, barrel length, options etc.) for testing before it has a chance of getting on the list. That can get expensive and takes time to push them through the states limited testing capacity. Usually what happens is that the most popular models/finishes/options go in first .
My guess is the model you want will get on the list eventually but only S&W or the state can say when.
As for other models, you need to watch the list or see your local shop.
Good luck.
p.s. Don't you feel safer knowing you can't get the blue one? :-(
|
Thanks for your help Wee! The blue finish actually did concern but now that I read your post I will try to steer away from pistols with that finish. You would think that an $1100 gun would only offered in stainless. I really dont know much at all but maybe there is some reasoning behind it.
|
01-16-2011, 11:27 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tocohillsguy
Not sure about the particular model you are looking at, but if it doesn't have a firing pin safety, it won't pass the California drop test unless the manufacturer changes out the firing pin (for a lighter firing pin) and/or puts in a stronger firing pin spring. Some manufacturers go through that process for some of their models. Others do not. Some buyers will not purchase a 1911 that originates from California because they don't want those "safety" features. I've also heard of Californians who have been forced to buy a particular model in a particular finish, and then they immediately send it back to the manufacturer for the finish color they prefer. Thankfully I don't live in California.
|
Thanks for the input Toco! I wish there was somebody or something that could tell me exactly why it is not approved. Do you have any idea of how much it might cost to have the finish and color changed? Thanks for your help.
|
01-17-2011, 12:05 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 661
Likes: 4
Liked 289 Times in 166 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bwelte01
Thanks for your help Wee! The blue finish actually did concern but now that I read your post I will try to steer away from pistols with that finish. You would think that an $1100 gun would only offered in stainless. I really dont know much at all but maybe there is some reasoning behind it.
|
The reasoning is they don't want to make it easy for you to buy a gun.
Also, they want the the gun to be SAFE in their definition. It doesn't malfunction and go off or be to easy to shoot...
|
01-17-2011, 12:27 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: metro Atlanta
Posts: 535
Likes: 21
Liked 45 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bwelte01
Thanks for the input Toco! I wish there was somebody or something that could tell me exactly why it is not approved. Do you have any idea of how much it might cost to have the finish and color changed? Thanks for your help.
|
I suggest you call S&W and ask. My suspicion is that it isn't approved because S&W hasn't submitted it for approval. Also for finish, you could investigate purchasing the stainless and then sending it to Wilson for an Armour Tuff finish or Ed Brown for the 3rd Gen finish. There are others that will also refinish it with any number for different products. With shipping the cost isn't going to be cheap. Just doing the slide would be cheaper.
|
01-17-2011, 02:40 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: California
Posts: 168
Likes: 2
Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
As a Retired California LE, CA gun laws suck thats the only way to put it.
__________________
20 years Mil, 18 yrs Sac P.D.
|
01-17-2011, 11:54 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 5,767
Liked 1,593 Times in 464 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tocohillsguy
My suspicion is that it isn't approved because S&W hasn't submitted it for approval.
|
You would think that, California being such a big market, they'd try to get their products approved there.
|
01-17-2011, 12:55 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: metro Atlanta
Posts: 535
Likes: 21
Liked 45 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LedFowl
You would think that, California being such a big market, they'd try to get their products approved there.
|
When I spoke to a Remington rep a few months ago he indicated that Remington wasn't submitting its new 1911 to California. I believe there is a growing manufacturer resentment to the California protocol. It wouldn't surprise me if you saw fewer and fewer gun models submitted. At some point it's possible that the only gun models that will be submitted are those being used to fill law enforcement or other big ticket contracts.
|
01-17-2011, 01:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 373
Likes: 2
Liked 21 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
1911's in Ca
Contact Valkyre Tactical and ask them to get the gun for you. They are a central Ca company that modifies 1911's among other guns to get them in state under the "Single Shot Exemption" in the safe roster law. Once the gun has been converted and legally transfered to the new owner, the owner converts it back and sends Valkyre back the conversion parts. Many people have taken advantage of their service on 1911's, Springfield XDm's, Gen 4 Glocks, and other "off list" guns. Their cost for the service is reasonable, and they are stocking dealers for several makes as well.
valkyrietactical.com
There is a thread on Calguns.net about the conversion process and the laws regarding it.
|
01-17-2011, 02:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: CA.
Posts: 116
Likes: 2
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Been down the same road...
...When I wanted to buy a Colt Gold Cup Trophy. It's a real annoyance.
Of all manufacturers, S&W I believe has the most listed on the roster. Colt has the least.
For anyone in CA. that isn't exempt, always check the roster to make sure the handgun you want is listed.
Roster of Handguns Certified for Sale - Firearms Division - California Dept. of Justice - Office of the Attorney General
After paying the certification fee, the manufacturers also must pay a yearly re-listing fee or the handgun will be dropped from the roster.
The 2 major prerequisites to be added to the "safe" list for an auto are a magazine disconnect and a loaded chamber indicator, the rest is passing drop and other tests.
Don't forget about the CA. ban on internet/mail order ammo that goes in to effect on 2-1-2011.
Quote:
As a Retired California LE, CA gun laws suck that's the only way to put it.
|
As a Californian, that's actually a nice way to put it, I wouldn't have been as charitable.
|
01-17-2011, 04:52 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: metro Atlanta
Posts: 535
Likes: 21
Liked 45 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
I use to think the California gun laws were ridiculous, but given the many nutty loons in that state, I'm beginning to think it's wise. In fact it's probably best that the Burkeley crowd not be allowed weapons of any kind. Better that they stay huddled in their homes and wait for Govenor Moon Beam and other government authorities to save them from all the many dangers they fear, including global warming and the Happy Meals they seek to ban. My apologies and sympathies to the sane ones that remain in California.
|
01-17-2011, 05:42 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 4,468
Likes: 3,068
Liked 4,294 Times in 1,610 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bwelte01
Thanks for your help Wee! The blue finish actually did concern but now that I read your post I will try to steer away from pistols with that finish. You would think that an $1100 gun would only offered in stainless. I really dont know much at all but maybe there is some reasoning behind it.
|
Don't get me wrong, I like blued / black guns allot. It's just that some finishes are better than others.
Just noticed the Sig 1911 Targets are on the CA list. You can get those in Black Nitron finish for about the same $ as the S&W you picked out. I have one and it's a Fine gun.
Sig Products & Services
__________________
Dave
|
01-17-2011, 09:09 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 150
Likes: 39
Liked 52 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
After you figure out what is "approved" in Kalifornia, maybe you and all the other good gun owners of that state should start calling your represenatives and congress men and women. You want your rights, as we all do. You have got to be active and make your many voices heard. I am on a personal rampage here in Iowa, and we just got the "right to carry" law passed here. I gaurantee the folks representing our state know who I am. Do the reps in your state know you????
|
01-18-2011, 01:14 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: CA.
Posts: 116
Likes: 2
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Kalsem
After you figure out what is "approved" in Kalifornia, maybe you and all the other good gun owners of that state should start calling your represenatives and congress men and women. You want your rights, as we all do. You have got to be active and make your many voices heard. I am on a personal rampage here in Iowa, and we just got the "right to carry" law passed here. I gaurantee the folks representing our state know who I am. Do the reps in your state know you????
|
We're actually very active in California, we have to be. Many anti-gun bills have been defeated due to the efforts of the NRA, state organizations like CRPA and through the labors of dedicated gun owners on an individual level, you just don't hear about it.
Before the new ammo bill regulating ammunition sales was signed, individual gun owners literally jammed the governors phone line with calls and emails asking him not to sign the bill in to law, and there are currently three lawsuits, one active and two waiting for legal "ripeness," asking the courts to overturn AB 962, the bill regulating ammunition sales.
These lawsuits were all sponsored and funded by the good gun owners of California.
"Do the reps in your state know you????"
They know us, I can guarantee you that, the difference is for the most part they just don't care.
I grow weary of non-Californians criticising good CA. gun owners for not being proactive enough, it's just not factual. Go here and you'll get a small glimpse of active Californians:
2nd Amend. Related Legal & Political Discussion - Calguns.net
I offer this advice to anyone wanting to help California gun owners; we welcome your help and advice, but please be aware of the ongoing fight that California gun owners battle on a daily basis.
This isn't Iowa, it's a huge populous state and gun owners are staggeringly out numbered.
Sorry to smith-wessonforum for the somewhat off topic reply.
|
01-18-2011, 10:40 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: CA.
Posts: 116
Likes: 2
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
CA. AB962 overturned.
UPDATE
Don't be so quick to sell us short, we are actively defending our 2nd Amendment rights.
Today was a victory for all good law abiding California gun owners.
Court Grants NRA/CRPA Foundation Motion, Invalidates Unconstitutional Ammunition Regulation Statute That Would Have Banned Mail order Ammo Sales & Required Ammo Sales Registration
1/18/11
In a dramatic ruling giving gun owners a win in an National Rifle Association/California Rifle and Pistol (CRPA) Foundation lawsuit, this morning Fresno Superior Court Judge Jeffrey Hamilton ruled that AB 962, the hotly contested statute that would have banned mail order ammunition sales and required all purchases of so called "handgun ammunition” to be registered, was unconstitutionally vague on its face. The Court enjoined enforcement of the statute, so mail order ammunition sales to California can continue unabated, and ammunition sales need not be registered under the law.
Full text:
CRPA
Again, apologies to smith-wessonforum if this is somewhat off topic, but this is an important development for all gun owners.
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|