Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols > Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols

Notices

Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols Other Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols from the 1950's to Present


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-20-2011, 02:15 AM
lanxandreads lanxandreads is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 3 Posts
Default 4006 vs M&P40

I sold off my my only 40 cal gun with about 500 rounds of ammo still lying around so NATURALLY I need a new handgun to shoot it all.
I'm torn between getting another 3rd gen or an M&P (maybe compact). Anybody have some suggestions, advice, generalized comments? Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-20-2011, 03:05 AM
sw44spl's Avatar
sw44spl sw44spl is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NORTH CAROLINA.
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 280
Liked 1,072 Times in 241 Posts
Default

I have both. but I find it hard to beat the 4006 and its weight for helping control the recoil of the 40sw round.dont get me wrong the M&P40 is a sweet shooting gun and I even have the 40c.it is great one handed I can get 2 inch groups at 15 yds. great on recoil.but there is just something about that 4006.It has a place in my heart.
__________________
God save the SOUTH
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-20-2011, 10:02 AM
18DAI's Avatar
18DAI 18DAI is offline
Absent Comrade
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: GSO NC
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 23,604
Liked 13,195 Times in 2,860 Posts
Default

I vote get the 4006. Superior pistol to the M&P, IMO of course.

The 4006 has a better trigger and I've found the most worn out poorly cared for 4006 to be more accurate than any M&P I've fired.

The 4006 is durable and reliable. The M&P has not been around long enough to see how durable it will be.

A nice 4006 can usually be found for less money than an M&P too. Unless you find an M&P that someone purchased based on all the hype and then discovered that they didn't like it. Those are often listed in the classifieds here for less than you will pay at the LGS.

Good luck with your decision! Regards 18DAI.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-20-2011, 10:27 AM
VTHokiesDuckHunter VTHokiesDuckHunter is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 560
Likes: 30
Liked 229 Times in 118 Posts
Default

18DAI nailed it. I'd add one more thing:

You will be able to buy brand new M&P's easily for the next 5+ years at the very least so you can always buy one of those.

Of course you will always be able to buy a 4006 from someone that wants to sell one, but they are getting harder and harder to find LNIB and NIB if that is what you want. It does look like a fair amount of LE trade-ins on the market right now, but there is a finite amount of 4006's floating around.

Get a nice 4006 now- you can always buy an M&P 40 in the future. Probably for a lot less money than t hey are selling for today.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-20-2011, 10:35 AM
Broker50 Broker50 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: East Kentucky
Posts: 808
Likes: 247
Liked 189 Times in 102 Posts
Default

I have owned a 4006, currently have a 4003TSW, a 4013, & FS M&P40. I'm gonna' vote for the M&P40. It's so much better ergonomically, & I prefer the consistent trigger pull over the DA/SA transition of the 3rd gen pistols. I have found most 3rd gen pistols to be combat accurate, in essence not particularlly accurate. Neither are "match quality" target pistols. I shoot the M&P autos better, but that's just me, & it could be because of the nearly perfect (for me) feel of the grip.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-20-2011, 10:47 AM
epj's Avatar
epj epj is offline
US Veteran
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 228
Liked 2,397 Times in 1,081 Posts
Default

I have a 5906, 4006, 4566TSW, and a 1006. Of the four, the 4006 is the least accurate, or maybe just the one I shoot the least accurately. That said, there are a ton of 4006's around for cheap. It may just be my individual gun.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-20-2011, 01:46 PM
yustinus1973's Avatar
yustinus1973 yustinus1973 is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 169
Likes: 5
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Default

I say vote 4006, not to dissuade you from the M&P. But i dont have a M&P but i do have a 4006TSW, and i love it, so its what i can recommend. I dont think you can go wrong with a 4006.
__________________
Boomer Sooner
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-20-2011, 02:28 PM
Tracer_Bullet Tracer_Bullet is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 631
Likes: 10
Liked 192 Times in 84 Posts
Default

No offense to those who like the M&P, but I just couldn't warm up to it. I had the 40 compact and between the lousy trigger and the really short grips I couldn't shoot it worth a darn, and neither could my wife. It did have a soft recoil for a .40 though. I sold that gun and have never looked back.
A few months ago I found a NIB 4006TSW and there is just no comparison in my opinion. For me the 4006 fits my hand much better, the trigger is far superior, and it is much more accurate for both me and my wife. For me the 4006TSW is a keeper, and I found another NIB that I bought as a spare.
Others may find the opposite to be true, so handle each gun and shoot it before buying if possible.
__________________
Ban lunatics and criminals
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-20-2011, 03:44 PM
Stu1205's Avatar
Stu1205 Stu1205 is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 681
Liked 1,182 Times in 396 Posts
Default

I vote for the 4006. I have one and I love it. I also have a 5906 and a 4506. I like the feel of an all steel gun in my hand. I have shot a few of the plastic guns, and I just don't care for them. The only plastic gun I own is the Kel-Tec P3AT, and it has it's niche it certain situations. My daily carry gun is the AMT Backup in 45 ACP. Again, I would opt for the 4006. You can't go wrong.
__________________
NRA Benefactor/Cert Instructor

Last edited by Stu1205; 06-20-2011 at 04:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-20-2011, 05:34 PM
VTHokiesDuckHunter VTHokiesDuckHunter is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 560
Likes: 30
Liked 229 Times in 118 Posts
Default

I should have added something to my early post, since you mentioned that you might possibly be looking for a compact model in .40 S&W

I normally shoot and carry 5906's, which are one of my all time favorite models of pistol.

I was recently looking for a compact 3rd gen S&W for CCW and had been looking for a 3913 (9mm, single stack magazine) or a 6906 (9mm, double stack). Then I started thinking that maybe I would like a .40 S&W so that opened up the search for a 4013.

I was very lucky to find a 4014, which is a blackened variant of the 4013. First trip to the range last week and I absolutely love everything about it. I put about 200 rounds through it with no FTF or any problems and it was a nice little shooter. Plus it is a lot easier to control for a compact gun in .40 S&W than anything else I've shot.

So what I'm suggesting is to look at both the 4006 (SS Frame)/4003 (Alloy Frame) guns, as well as look at the compact 40's like the 4013, 4013TSW (tactical), 4014 (pretty rare) and my favorite of all that is on my short list of wants/needs- the Shorty Forty MK III.

Finally, another great one if you want someting even smaller- The Chief's Special in .40 S&W (or "CS40".)

Good Luck!

(good friends don't let friends shoot plastic)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-20-2011, 06:26 PM
lanxandreads lanxandreads is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Thanks for the suggestion VDH!

I completely forgot about the 4013 and 4014. I have recently bought a CS45 and it is a pretty sweet gun (still haven't gotten a chance to fire it yet)

EDIT:
WOW. the 4013 and 4014 are NOT cheap. The cheapest i could find online is about 675.00. Shorty forties are going for over a grand??

sheesh

Last edited by lanxandreads; 06-20-2011 at 07:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-21-2011, 12:27 AM
VTHokiesDuckHunter VTHokiesDuckHunter is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 560
Likes: 30
Liked 229 Times in 118 Posts
Default

this LNIB 4014 was well under $400. Just took some patience (and maybe luck!)

yes - I've seen a lot of 4013's for $600 but I've also seen some nice ones for $400. they go quick at $350 - $400.

Also don't forget to check out the classifieds on this forum.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Tim's 4014 062011.jpg (63.4 KB, 74 views)
File Type: jpg New 4014.jpg (72.3 KB, 69 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #13  
Old 06-21-2011, 01:14 AM
ab4ka's Avatar
ab4ka ab4ka is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lakeland, Florida
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 8
Liked 64 Times in 40 Posts
Default

I'd trade all that .40S&W ammo for a bunch of 9mm (only because the only gun in that caliber I could ever shoot decently was a Glock 23) and get me a S&W 5906 or 6906
__________________
"I'm your huckleberry."
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-21-2011, 07:44 AM
Jim H Jim H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 292
Likes: 1
Liked 24 Times in 12 Posts
Default

The 4006 and the M&P have different trigger systems. 4006 is a 'traditional' DA/SA, while the M&P striker is more like a DAO. Pick whichever trigger suits your fancy.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-21-2011, 10:07 AM
anothermiller's Avatar
anothermiller anothermiller is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Another vote for the 4006.

I was looking at glock until I shot a 3rd gen smith.I wouldnt trade my 4006 for even a new sig.

I enjoy mine,it shoots pretty darn good for a gun that been shot so many times.I was hitting 20 oz soda bottles at 30 yards with regularity, using cheap winchester white box.

Solid stainless steel,I dont think I'll ever wear them out.

Last edited by anothermiller; 06-21-2011 at 03:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-21-2011, 11:38 AM
Tracer_Bullet Tracer_Bullet is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 631
Likes: 10
Liked 192 Times in 84 Posts
Default

4013 sounds like a good call for something a little more compact and lighter than the 4006. I found a 4013TSW locally for $530, but am not in the market for one.
I can carry the 4006TSW IWB, but it does require a sturdy belt and a decent holster. Not something I would do every day, though
__________________
Ban lunatics and criminals
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-21-2011, 12:25 PM
VTHokiesDuckHunter VTHokiesDuckHunter is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 560
Likes: 30
Liked 229 Times in 118 Posts
Default

4053 -

another good choice that is often overlooked is the 4053. This is a Double Action Only version -compact .40 S&W with SS slide and alloy frame.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-21-2011, 05:27 PM
lanxandreads lanxandreads is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Thanks for the advice again.

If only I caught this special in time!
Pete's Firearms: S&W 4053 Law Enforcement trade ins
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-22-2011, 12:10 AM
carbuncle carbuncle is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 312
Likes: 5
Liked 42 Times in 27 Posts
Default

I have the M&P .40 and love it, and I 'm saving up for a 4006 as well: both great guns, the main factor is whether you want the modern polymer wondergun with 16 rounds on board or the classic lines and smooth shooting characteristics of the 3rd Generation.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-23-2011, 06:37 PM
Shorty4T's Avatar
Shorty4T Shorty4T is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Conyers, GA
Posts: 385
Likes: 2
Liked 57 Times in 28 Posts
Default

For me it has a lot to do with the purpose of the pistol, I have 4 3rd gen 40s (4006, 4003, Shorty 40 gen 1, Shorty 40 gen 2). I also have a M&P40c, the M&P generally gets the utility duties like when I go walk in the morning. The 3rd gen guns normally come out when the weather turns cooler.

I like both pistols, they shoot equally well. Let's face it though we love the 3rd gen guns because they aren't plastic and they look nicer...a lot I might add. But we pay the price in weight for this line of thought.

Cheers,
Sam
__________________
Beware the man with one gun...
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 06-23-2011, 09:53 PM
roughneck6 roughneck6 is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 124
Likes: 47
Liked 63 Times in 35 Posts
Default

I agree with Sam, both are great guns. I picked up a 4014' had it sent to the PC for a duty action job, bead blasted and re-blued. The trigger is incredible after the PC work on the gun. The gun looks brand new. I have a M&P 40c and carry a M&P 40 on duty, with a 642 backup. The trigger on both my M&P 40's are great, just different from the SA/DA on my third gen Smiths. For a CCW, I carry the 4014. I concur, they are hard to come by, especially the eight round magazines. They can be found, and I have a collection of eight now, several I found brand new still in the plastic. My M&P's are just dead accurate, almost as much as my Smith 1911.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-24-2011, 03:57 AM
vista461's Avatar
vista461 vista461 is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: S.E. WI
Posts: 847
Likes: 114
Liked 135 Times in 75 Posts
Default

How much was the action job on the 4014?
__________________
M&P .40, M&P 9c & Shield 45
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-24-2011, 07:12 AM
FirebirdV8's Avatar
FirebirdV8 FirebirdV8 is offline
SWCA Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Parkesburg PA
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 77
Liked 241 Times in 98 Posts
Default

The M&P is a nice pistol, but the 3rd gens just have something about them the M&P line doesn't. The 4006 is a tank and will run forever. For example, when I got my 4006 used, I put some oil on the rails and fired it before taking it home. It worked perfectly. When I took it home and did a detail strip, I found the firing pin channel was filled with gunk, as it had probably never been cleaned, but it still worked. 3rd gen pistols are just plain reliable.

On a side note also look for a 4040PD in a search for a compact 3rd gen 40 cal. They can be hard to find, but are great guns, basically a 3913 in 40 cal.
__________________
J.D. Roy
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-25-2011, 01:25 AM
RobG5589's Avatar
RobG5589 RobG5589 is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: N. Commiefornia
Posts: 189
Likes: 3
Liked 34 Times in 20 Posts
Default

As much as I love my M&P, I like my '06 that much better. Sweet trigger (And my M&P has Apex goodies), shortest reset I have ever felt, accurate, built like a tank, and its an Alaska DPS gun so its a bit unique. I'd love to have a Shorty 40 myself but, damn, they are spendy! Maybe someday.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-26-2011, 12:12 AM
lanxandreads lanxandreads is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobG5589 View Post
As much as I love my M&P, I like my '06 that much better. Sweet trigger (And my M&P has Apex goodies), shortest reset I have ever felt, accurate, built like a tank, and its an Alaska DPS gun so its a bit unique. I'd love to have a Shorty 40 myself but, damn, they are spendy! Maybe someday.
Heh... I haven't heard the term "spendy" since my 2 week visit to Juneau.

I have my sights on a 4043 that comes with 3 mags I found in a local classified. I plan on inspecting it on Monday to see if it's worth my while.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-26-2011, 10:48 AM
VTHokiesDuckHunter VTHokiesDuckHunter is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 560
Likes: 30
Liked 229 Times in 118 Posts
Default they don't look and feel like this

M&P's are certainly very nice and I wouldn't hesitate to buy one........while you are looking for a 3rd gen. Nothing feels or handles like a 3rd gen S&W.

Here's my 4014 (a blackened version of the 4013). I'd be looking for a 4013, 4013 TSW, 4014, or a CS40 if it is for CCW, since you mentioned "maybe (a) compact". And add to the list a Shorty 40/Mark III if you have the extra bucks. If you don't want a compact model definitely a 4003 or 4003 variant.

The above mentioned compacts are very concealable, but IMO handle and shoot a lot better than the polymer guns because of their ergonomics and slightly heavier weight.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Tim's 4014 062011.jpg (63.4 KB, 39 views)
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-26-2011, 03:20 PM
lanxandreads lanxandreads is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VTHokiesDuckHunter View Post
M&P's are certainly very nice and I wouldn't hesitate to buy one........while you are looking for a 3rd gen. Nothing feels or handles like a 3rd gen S&W.

Here's my 4014 (a blackened version of the 4013). I'd be looking for a 4013, 4013 TSW, 4014, or a CS40 if it is for CCW, since you mentioned "maybe (a) compact". And add to the list a Shorty 40/Mark III if you have the extra bucks. If you don't want a compact model definitely a 4003 or 4003 variant.

The above mentioned compacts are very concealable, but IMO handle and shoot a lot better than the polymer guns because of their ergonomics and slightly heavier weight.
Great looking gun. The shorties were automatically taken off my list after being thoroughly shocked by the sticker price.

The only somewhat minor cosmetic thing about the TSW series is huge engravings on the slide. It kind of gives it a toy-like appearance, imo, in fact when I first saw one I thought it was an air-soft gun.
But again, that's just me.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-29-2011, 11:19 PM
lanxandreads lanxandreads is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 3 Posts
Default

I finally decided to get the 4043. I ordered it from summit gun broker on Monday and it arrived at my FFL dealer on Wednesday! A full day before the projected date!
The gun is in amazing condition besides the minor holster wear and I ordered an extra two mags for ten bucks each. It's also a lot lighter than i thought it would be even with a full mag. The grand total was including the transfer fee was $369.00. Not a bad deal.
Can't wait to shoot it!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-30-2011, 07:38 AM
Mule88's Avatar
Mule88 Mule88 is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vandalia, Ohio
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 300
Liked 231 Times in 137 Posts
Default

I have both the 4006 and the M&P 40. For whatever reason I shoot the M&P much better and its more accurate than my 4006. both are good guns but in this case with the 2 guns I have, I prefer the M&P, plus it holds more rounds.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-01-2011, 08:13 AM
Wishoot's Avatar
Wishoot Wishoot is offline
Member
4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40 4006 vs M&P40  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Miwaukee
Posts: 363
Likes: 384
Liked 219 Times in 96 Posts
Default

I like them both, but the M&P felt too much like my Glock 22 (for me at least) and found that I shot it no better than the G22 or 4006.

Long story short: my only 40 S&W is a 4006 now.
__________________
-Mike-
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
1911, 3913, 4013, 4506, 4566, 5906, 642, 6906, ccw, cs45, glock, model 60, polymer, sig arms, springfield, tactical, transition, winchester

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
S&W 4006 ultraliter Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 0 08-22-2014 12:22 PM
4006 Bar-Sto ImjinScout Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 6 01-05-2014 10:13 PM
4006 Revolver-time Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 11 09-18-2011 01:21 PM
WTB 4006 Geno44 WANTED to Buy 0 06-07-2011 09:34 AM
WTT 4006 + cash for 4006 TSW triggernick GUNS - For Sale or Trade 8 07-26-2009 01:07 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:53 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)