The 4516 is a big, heavy gun for its "compact" size (if that makes any sense
) so of course it is not going to recoil like a Lightweight Officer's model, or something similar. I think the combination of heavy slide, stiff recoil spring, and heavy overall weight of the gun make it comfortable to shoot. The hand has a lot of area to get a hold of, and the magazine floor plate, which serves as an extension, also aids the control and feel of the gun. Timing may have a little something to do with it? Maybe the S&W unlocks just a bit more quickly than a 1911-type gun? Any recoil-operated, locked breech gun should be similar, but maybe tiny differences amount to more than we think?
As to just how the gun is locked, that is probably more a matter of convenience of manufacture and fitting than how it feels when fired. No pistol is going to be consistently accurate if it "locks" only on the hood, since the hood can only establish side-to-side fit of the barrel in the slide. (SIGs lock on the front end of the ejection port in the slide, which, together with hood fit, controls front-to-back play in the slide-barrel assembly, and of course the M&P does the same.) The SIG system is probably considerably easier to machine and fit with a high degree of precision than Browning-type lugs both in the slide and on the barrel. "Locking" only the "hood" (as we think of it in a 1911, i.e., the read end of the barrel) would actually lock nothing and would leave the pistol free to choose whatever headspace it likes.
4516s are pretty pleasant guns to shoot. I think the M&P series is too (in .45 caliber), as is the SIG 220, for an Aluminum-frame gun. 1911s seem good too, until the lightweight frame models come into play, and especially those of the Officer's length.