|
|
12-27-2011, 09:37 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 3
Liked 68 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Barrel bushing on 639
I got my newest acquistion under good light the other night and discovered that the barrel bushing doesn't seem to be SS, or at least it is certainly darker than the rest of the pistol. I know they have some different metal on the back strap, and safety lever, but what about the bushing? What about the rest of you 639 owners?
|
12-27-2011, 05:08 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 3
Liked 68 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
I don't know why SS wouldn't be strong enough for a bushing? They make pretty big revolvers out of them. I've ask S&W if their replacement bushing is SS or what?
|
12-27-2011, 10:48 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East St. Louis, Il.
Posts: 1,698
Likes: 3,592
Liked 618 Times in 343 Posts
|
|
Could be carbon build up from a lot of firing, sorta like the chambers on a stainless revolver after shooting. Or they used a different grade of stainless which doesn't make sense!
Tell ya what, if you have access to some scotchbrite pads give it a once over with that and see if it shines it up. Dale
__________________
"Long live the S&W 3rd. Gen.!"
|
12-28-2011, 11:37 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Hawkeye turned Longhorn
Posts: 152
Likes: 1
Liked 22 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
The bushing on my 639 gets blackened-much like the front of a revolver cylinder-after shooting. Some Flitz or Break Free gets it as clean as new. There should be a small "S" (denoting stainless) stamped on top of the bushing.
Best,
Heekma
|
12-28-2011, 06:35 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 3
Liked 68 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
I had thought of the carbon, but don't really think that's it, but will check again. I had just cleaned it.
On my e-mail to S&W: "We are on vacation this week. Please re-submit your e-mail next week." DUH! Resubmit? Don't they have an e-mail file in the big corporation?
|
12-28-2011, 07:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wheatland, Missouri
Posts: 14
Likes: 7
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Unrelated question
I'm new here so I hope I am not out of line for asking an unrelated question. I would like to know if it is OK to dry fire my SW 639?
Grumpy
|
12-30-2011, 02:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 3
Liked 68 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Dry fire always seems to draw a lot of opinions. I can't think of a firearm I have owned that I didn't dry fire at one time or another. I would hate to think I owned a gun that fragile. At the same time, I don't make a habit of it, either.
|
12-30-2011, 02:59 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Hawkeye turned Longhorn
Posts: 152
Likes: 1
Liked 22 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Hey Armyphotog,
I just got a 659, and while cleaning I took a close look at the bushing. It seems to look as if it was cast--not saying it was, just looks that way. It has a slightly porous surface and does seem darker than the other stainless parts, even after cleaning.
The bushing on my 639 looks the same.
They are both marked "S" for stainless.
Don't know if that helps much, but it seems to be the norm, at least on my 659 and 639.
Best,
Heekma
|
12-31-2011, 05:46 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wheatland, Missouri
Posts: 14
Likes: 7
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Thank You,
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:49 PM.