|
|
04-26-2012, 05:31 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: TX
Posts: 861
Likes: 433
Liked 611 Times in 277 Posts
|
|
Square trigger guard on 5906
I've wondered for a while, was the square trigger guard before or after the rounded one? Is one more sought after or valuable for some reason? I don't carry so I'm not up one things like this issue.
|
04-26-2012, 05:59 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: FLORIDA
Posts: 149
Likes: 20
Liked 59 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
If its like my 669 I believe the Square came before the round type......personally I like the square better...for function, not looks...
|
04-26-2012, 06:06 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Western South Dakota
Posts: 560
Likes: 9
Liked 385 Times in 139 Posts
|
|
Once upon a time , a Smith and Wesson engineer discovered a little known equation dating back to Leonardo Da Vinci's time which established that the longer a gun's trigger guard was, the more accurate the piece would be.Then one day someone found out the legend was bunk and rather than admit that-which would hurt sales-the errant employee was quietly dismissed, and the trigger guards were switched to the curved variant under the cover of night.
Or so the legend goes, in any case.
In real life, the difference is just appearance.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-26-2012, 06:17 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 411
Likes: 32
Liked 227 Times in 89 Posts
|
|
And as far as one being more sought after than the other, it's mostly personal preference I think. I would never buy one with a squared trigger guard, or adjustable sights either for that matter...but that's just me.
|
04-26-2012, 06:51 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: S.E. WI
Posts: 847
Likes: 114
Liked 135 Times in 75 Posts
|
|
I personally don't care for the square guard, it would have to be a unbelieveable deal for me to get one. There are those that prefer them, but they seem in the minority.
__________________
M&P .40, M&P 9c & Shield 45
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-26-2012, 08:24 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 232
Likes: 11
Liked 113 Times in 45 Posts
|
|
I originally did not care at all for the square guard, but for some reason I have now grown accustomed to it. I guesss I think it gives the 5906 even more of a "classic" look to it.
|
04-26-2012, 08:36 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 1,661
Liked 1,852 Times in 560 Posts
|
|
It's what keeps my 1006 from looking like my 4506.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-26-2012, 09:02 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Northern KY
Posts: 133
Likes: 49
Liked 111 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
I prefer the round guard, but wouldn't mind having a second with the square guard - mainly as an excuse to have another 5906 .
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-27-2012, 09:16 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 787
Likes: 594
Liked 489 Times in 232 Posts
|
|
The drawback on the square trigger guard models is that holsters are a bit harder to find.
|
04-27-2012, 12:24 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 296
Liked 785 Times in 356 Posts
|
|
I was told by a LE rep way back in the day that the hooked guard was added because several large police department specs/bids required a trigger guard that could be used to press against a barricade for support. Which does sound very 1980's to me.
|
04-27-2012, 12:31 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 560
Likes: 30
Liked 229 Times in 118 Posts
|
|
Square trigger guards seem to be back in vogue these days with a few manufacturers.
Beretta 92FS (rounded bottom, square front); Sig P229, 2022, etc.
Last edited by VTHokiesDuckHunter; 04-27-2012 at 12:33 PM.
|
04-27-2012, 04:57 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SE Iowa on the Mississipp
Posts: 3,137
Likes: 1
Liked 352 Times in 230 Posts
|
|
Whatever the reason for it you saw the square guard show up about halfway through the second generation guns with the introduction of the 469/669 "mini gun" and 645. It carried over for the first 3-4 years of third generation guns.
|
04-27-2012, 05:14 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Montana
Posts: 822
Likes: 503
Liked 452 Times in 253 Posts
|
|
Like both here! Never met a 5906 I didn't like...
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-27-2012, 05:15 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: TX
Posts: 861
Likes: 433
Liked 611 Times in 277 Posts
|
|
Thanks for the replies, appreciate the input and knowledge. I bought a 469 with square trigger guard and really like how it looks. I just saw the 5906 with sq guard for sale and wondered. Something about it is kind of cool to me.
Pic of 469
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-27-2012, 05:20 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Windham,Maine,USA
Posts: 77
Likes: 1
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
they can't be all that bad! Glorps have da squares too! My 4506 has one; it's not that big of a deal to me, but I believethey came first.
|
03-09-2016, 11:49 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 30
Likes: 35
Liked 47 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
I have both...and like them both, but am planning to sell one to get something different. My use is target shooting only, but I find them pretty much equal. Any suggestions on which one to keep?
20160308_194736-1-1 (Custom).jpg
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-09-2016, 12:53 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: DeKalb, IL
Posts: 83
Likes: 44
Liked 105 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daugier
My use is target shooting only, but I find them pretty much equal. Any suggestions on which one to keep?
|
Assuming you didn't do a trigger job on the forged parts on the earlier pistol, I would expect the later one with the MIM parts to have a marginally smoother trigger. That would give it a leg up for me, though obviously the MIM-haters might disagree. There's also better parts availability for the MIM stuff and probably those Novak sights, too.
|
03-09-2016, 01:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 20
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
I bought a S&W 669 in 1986 with the square trigger guard, it didn't come any other way. Bought a S&W 5906 in 1988, again had the square trigger guard. At one point in the 1980's the trend for a lot of shooters was to place the index finger of the support hand on the front of the trigger guard (I never shot that way). Any holster fitted for the square trigger guard also worked for the same model with the later round trigger guard
|
03-09-2016, 02:24 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 654
Likes: 728
Liked 648 Times in 281 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daugier
I have both...and like them both, but am planning to sell one to get something different. My use is target shooting only, but I find them pretty much equal. Any suggestions on which one to keep?
Attachment 229524
|
I also have one of each, and can NOT condone the selling of a S&W 3rd Gen.
Seeing that it's just a personal preference, sell the one you like the least and or brings the highest $.
|
03-09-2016, 05:04 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,782
Likes: 1,241
Liked 5,839 Times in 2,365 Posts
|
|
Fashion of the time. IIRC some of the top IPSC shooters found they shot better by putting the index finger of the supporting hand in front of the trigger guard so it became "chic" to have a squared off trigger guard with checkering.
|
03-09-2016, 11:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Spanaway, Wa
Posts: 508
Likes: 869
Liked 371 Times in 181 Posts
|
|
I don't care for square trigger guards on all pistol designs but on second and third gen Smiths it just looks right to me.
|
03-18-2016, 06:41 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 330
Likes: 109
Liked 84 Times in 57 Posts
|
|
I don't care about the shape of the trigger guard, square or round, since I don't put my off hand 1st finger there anyway.
|
03-18-2016, 10:37 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 328
Likes: 17
Liked 40 Times in 26 Posts
|
|
My 5904 has the square trigger guard. My only complaint is that holsters are hard to come by.
__________________
5903TSW 5904 5906 6906 4006
|
03-18-2016, 10:56 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 5,947
Likes: 24,644
Liked 6,195 Times in 2,575 Posts
|
|
Some CZ's sport the square guard.
|
03-18-2016, 11:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Colorado (unfortunately)
Posts: 379
Likes: 731
Liked 222 Times in 128 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daugier
I have both...and like them both, but am planning to sell one to get something different. My use is target shooting only, but I find them pretty much equal. Any suggestions on which one to keep?
Attachment 229524
|
BOTH! Keep them...save up for the next one. I hear way too many stories here about people selling and wishing they hadn't. I have a 5906 since new and am horrible at shooting it.
Now my wife...she's pretty darn good with it! Ugh...
Has the round trigger guard and forged parts which I never knew about these things until today. That's why this place is so valuable...
__________________
S&W SS Revolvers
|
03-18-2016, 11:06 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 5,932
Liked 5,259 Times in 1,732 Posts
|
|
The square faced trigger guard came about by demand for it created by some off the wall TV series in the early '70s that featured a Detective that was shown quite a few times with his support hand index finger curled around the front of his trigger guard. Competitive shooters and Cops started having a Pistolsmith metal checker the front of their rounded trigger guard so they could also shoot that way without their finger being in danger of slipping. Several years went by and the handgun manufacturers ever seeking to cater to demand, no mater if the demand was for a solution to a non existent problem or not. Handgun trainers dutifully tried to make that shooting technique work. By about 1980 it was all but universally discounted as being anything more than a TV 'for dramatics' technique and not near as good of a grip as what is in common use today. Manufacturing being what it is, the response time to eliminate the square front trigger guard took different times for different models.
As a Pistolsmith, I did a lot of metal checkering on the front of rounded trigger guards because that is what the customer wanted. Later, I did some reshaping of square front trigger guards eliminating the blocky look for other customers. As a Firearms Trainer, I tried the support hand index finger out on the front of a couple of flat front trigger guards and determined that it was not near as good of a grip as is placing that index finger directly under the trigger guard and pressing up while shooting. ...
Last edited by Big Cholla; 03-18-2016 at 11:08 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|