I am hoping one of the 3rd gen experts out there can help me decide whether or not my recently-acquired 5904 needs a trip to S&W.
On the 5904 I have recently purchased, the slide-mounted safety does not drop the hammer. I have read that a worn sear release lever can cause this condition. However, I think that the pistol may have been built this way intentionally. I think that because the pistol has a "half-cock" position on the hammer, which 3rd gens don't typically have.
The pistol works fine in all other respects (disconnect on slide cycle, reset, SA and DA all work correctly) and seems to have all the appropriate parts. In addition, when the safety is engaged the trigger travel is limited and prevents the trigger from dropping the hammer. This all appears to work correctly, given the configuration.
The pistol is in excellent condition with very little wear (although it was dirty when it was found). It seems to be an early pistol, sporting the old-style grip (without the dimple in the base) and an AIP-prefixed serial number.
So my question are:
1) Has anyone ever witnessed a 3rd gen with a non-hammer-drop safety and a half-cock on the hammer?
2) What parts would be worn or incorrect to cause these two condition simultaneously?
Here are links to some pictures that may help:
Inside view showing the trigger area:
http://i48.tinypic.com/2j5dfrp.jpg
View of the sear release from the rear near the hammer. 1st picture is with the safety off, 2nd with the safety on. Note that the release appears to move correctly:
http://i46.tinypic.com/20roe3t.jpg
http://i49.tinypic.com/244boyr.jpg
Hammer when down, at half cock, and at full cock:
http://i45.tinypic.com/ab6m1h.jpg
http://i49.tinypic.com/iylq8p.jpg
http://i48.tinypic.com/2l9pcl.jpg
And, of course, left and right views:
http://i46.tinypic.com/2md299x.jpg
http://i50.tinypic.com/333cy10.jpg
Any help would be appreciated!!
Beuford
On the 5904 I have recently purchased, the slide-mounted safety does not drop the hammer. I have read that a worn sear release lever can cause this condition. However, I think that the pistol may have been built this way intentionally. I think that because the pistol has a "half-cock" position on the hammer, which 3rd gens don't typically have.
The pistol works fine in all other respects (disconnect on slide cycle, reset, SA and DA all work correctly) and seems to have all the appropriate parts. In addition, when the safety is engaged the trigger travel is limited and prevents the trigger from dropping the hammer. This all appears to work correctly, given the configuration.
The pistol is in excellent condition with very little wear (although it was dirty when it was found). It seems to be an early pistol, sporting the old-style grip (without the dimple in the base) and an AIP-prefixed serial number.
So my question are:
1) Has anyone ever witnessed a 3rd gen with a non-hammer-drop safety and a half-cock on the hammer?
2) What parts would be worn or incorrect to cause these two condition simultaneously?
Here are links to some pictures that may help:
Inside view showing the trigger area:
http://i48.tinypic.com/2j5dfrp.jpg
View of the sear release from the rear near the hammer. 1st picture is with the safety off, 2nd with the safety on. Note that the release appears to move correctly:
http://i46.tinypic.com/20roe3t.jpg
http://i49.tinypic.com/244boyr.jpg
Hammer when down, at half cock, and at full cock:
http://i45.tinypic.com/ab6m1h.jpg
http://i49.tinypic.com/iylq8p.jpg
http://i48.tinypic.com/2l9pcl.jpg
And, of course, left and right views:
http://i46.tinypic.com/2md299x.jpg
http://i50.tinypic.com/333cy10.jpg
Any help would be appreciated!!
Beuford