|
|
10-20-2013, 02:19 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Where to start?
Hi. I've become a big fan of S&W after making the jump from Glocks to the M&P series a few years ago. Now I'm kind of maxed out on plastic guns, and would like to pick up a nice "real" pistol. 1911s don't really do it for me, so I'm thinking a 3rd generation S&W auto would be the way to go.
If you were going to have just one S&W that met the qualities below, what would it be?
- All metal construction (preferably stainless)
- no DAO
- mid to full sized - not looking for a ccw
- Good reputation for accuracy & reliability
- Under $600
- 9mm or .45
|
10-20-2013, 02:27 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: st pete fla
Posts: 2,871
Likes: 5,648
Liked 2,763 Times in 1,213 Posts
|
|
All Stainless Steel
I got this a gun show a few weeks back. S&W639
|
10-20-2013, 02:51 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Foothills of the Ozarks
Posts: 3,596
Likes: 10,671
Liked 5,588 Times in 2,179 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodeal
Hi. I've become a big fan of S&W after making the jump from Glocks to the M&P series a few years ago. Now I'm kind of maxed out on plastic guns, and would like to pick up a nice "real" pistol. 1911s don't really do it for me, so I'm thinking a 3rd generation S&W auto would be the way to go.
If you were going to have just one S&W that met the qualities below, what would it be?
- All metal construction (preferably stainless)
- no DAO
- mid to full sized - not looking for a ccw
- Good reputation for accuracy & reliability
- Under $600
- 9mm or .45
|
Hi, Nodeal! Welcome to the forum.
First choice would be the Smith & Wesson flagship: The 5906.
All metal (stainless frame and slide)
TDA (Traditional Double Action: Double action first shot, single action subsequent shots)
Full Size (4" barrel; 40 ounces of recoil taming heft; not the best choice for CCW or all-day humping).
Bet your life on it reliable.
Almost never over $600.00 (Usually hundreds less).
9mm
By the way, the 5906 was produced in greater numbers than any other 3rd generation pistol with the possible exception of the 6906 (which is a 3 1/2" barreled, compact, alloy-framed version of the 5906). Both utilize double stack magazines.
Those would be my first two choices. Let's see what others have to say.
John
Last edited by JohnHL; 10-20-2013 at 04:31 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-20-2013, 03:14 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SF East Bay - "the delta"
Posts: 3,501
Likes: 1,587
Liked 4,495 Times in 1,516 Posts
|
|
Can't go wrong with either the 5906 of 9mm or the 4506 for .45 acp.
The 4506 is a 5" barrel, larger and heavier than the 5906.
The 4506 & 4506-1's are absolute tanks and will handle anything you feed them. I have seen it mentioned in other posts that they will even feed empty cases.
I have three 3rd Gen 45's, going from longest barrel to shortest... a 4506-1 (5"), 4566 (4-1/4") Melonite finish and a 4516-1 (3-3/4").
I picked the .45acp over 9mm (and I do have three 2nd Gen 9mm pistols too) because it's easier to reload and less fussy about the powder used, and ammo is readily available... seemingly more so than 9mm.
The 4566 is my favorite for EDC, the 4506-1 for range work. The 4516-1 was an impulse buy... I don't use it that much, but I won't get rid of it yet.. in CA one does not easily find them, so I need to be very sure that won't regret letting it go before I do such a thing.
In the 4506-1... change the recoil spring and you can easily shoot the .45 Super round for 10mm performance, if so desired.
So that's my .02 worth (.01 in today's dollar).
__________________
Conrad
SWCA #1830 SWHF #222
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-20-2013, 03:31 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The Great Midwest
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 1,716
Liked 2,368 Times in 1,003 Posts
|
|
I don't own any 3rd gen 45's but have a few others. For CC it's hard to beat the 9mm 3913/14 (single stack) or the 6906/04 (double stack). I have both of these and they are rock solid performers. 6906's will go around $400-$500 with the 3913 perhaps $100 more. TDA triggers that take a little practice if not familiar but 100% reliable and good looking.
My 3913 is a TSW but the standard version is a great gun. I also have a 6904 and a 6906...the 6906 in the picture I no longer have only due to the square trigger guard but I have one with the round guard that my oldest daughter somehow went home with and it is her house gun. I trust it with her life. The 6904 is one of my regular carry guns.
|
10-20-2013, 04:27 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,916
Likes: 3,522
Liked 6,742 Times in 2,625 Posts
|
|
I vote for a 5906. Built tank tough, and it has the advantage of Mec Gar magazines being readily available in both 15 round and 20 round versions. As the 5900 Series was fairly widely adopted, I would venture a guess that spare parts might be more readily available from other-than-factory sources when or if 5906 parts are no longer available from S&W.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-20-2013, 04:45 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: SW Mississippi
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 2,228
Liked 6,219 Times in 1,043 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodeal
If you were going to have just one S&W that met the qualities below, what would it be?
- All metal construction (preferably stainless)
- no DAO
- mid to full sized - not looking for a ccw
- Good reputation for accuracy & reliability
- Under $600
- 9mm or .45
|
That's easy,
This one
4566TSW PD turn-in that I re-hab'd.
All stainless with full length box rails and no scabbed on light mount.
$399 plus about another $50 in parts and my time to fix her up.
Shoots like a laser, "bet your life" reliable and arguably the TSWs were/are the ruggedest pistols S&W made.
The TSW guns ought to be referred to as 4th gen IMO.
Cheers
Bill
__________________
Because they don't make a .46
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-20-2013, 05:01 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 809
Liked 689 Times in 417 Posts
|
|
4506 or any version of it. No brainer, great guns.
__________________
Still carrying my S&W 642
|
10-20-2013, 05:20 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 1,661
Liked 1,852 Times in 560 Posts
|
|
3906 or 4506
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-20-2013, 06:57 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East St. Louis, Il.
Posts: 1,698
Likes: 3,592
Liked 618 Times in 343 Posts
|
|
5906. Simply it was most prominent at the time and 9mm was the round of choice (which seems to be coming back as well!)
Nothing against the fabulous 4506/4506-1, I just prefer the older version here, the 645!
I've had plenty of both and neither has ever let me down.
Dale
__________________
"Long live the S&W 3rd. Gen.!"
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-20-2013, 06:59 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chesapeake VA
Posts: 156
Likes: 14
Liked 52 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
I would say the 6906, small enough for carry, 12 rnd mag, sort of do anything you want pistol. Their are more accurate 3rd gens. and better carry but this one sort of will do anything you want. Or you can buy 3 or 4 pistols like everyone else.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-20-2013, 11:22 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Liked 74 Times in 47 Posts
|
|
Like BMCM said above the TSW series are great, if you can find one in the price range you want. My own 5943TSW is the best pistol I got going and with the grip changes I can be more traditional. Here it is with Cocobolo
You'd probably want a 5906TSW, there's a couple of threads out there with those in it.
|
10-20-2013, 11:37 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 116
Likes: 387
Liked 57 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Of the ones metioned, the 4566 is one of my favorites. Picked one up recently and took it straight to the range. Shot very well. The only thing I needed to replace was the recoil spring.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-22-2013, 10:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Greenville, SC USA
Posts: 26
Likes: 25
Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
I have a 4506, 5906, and a 6906. I would recommend any of them. It might be easier to find a 5906, and a bit cheaper too. They are fantastic handguns. You won't be disappointed with the one you chose to purchase.
|
10-23-2013, 08:14 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Osceola County, Fla.
Posts: 512
Likes: 23
Liked 262 Times in 116 Posts
|
|
Just be aware, once you start you can't stop. I think I'm up to 7 now. I have a 6906, 5906, and 4506-1 (my first .45) and you can't go wrong with any of them.
|
10-23-2013, 08:49 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: A Burb of the Burgh
Posts: 14,788
Likes: 1,669
Liked 19,897 Times in 8,797 Posts
|
|
The 5906 is a great place to start, for all the reasons stated above!
As also pointed out you will soon want a 6906 and a 3913/14.
Then you will wonder about a .45 so you will look for a 4506 then a 4566 and then a 4516..........
Many then think what about a .40.............
Good luck
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
10-23-2013, 09:12 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 809
Liked 689 Times in 417 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunhacker
The 4566 is my favorite for EDC, the 4506-1 for range work. The 4516-1 was an impulse buy... I don't use it that much, but I won't get rid of it yet.. in CA one does not easily find them, so I need to be very sure that won't regret letting it go before I do such a thing.
|
Why, why, WHY would you ever even consider breaking up that threesome! Don't do it, ever....you will regret it.
The 4566 is the one I am missing and eventually I'll own one. Then I'll have that threesome you have. So jealous.
__________________
Still carrying my S&W 642
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-23-2013, 09:31 AM
|
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: GSO NC
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 23,604
Liked 13,197 Times in 2,860 Posts
|
|
Another vote for the 4566, in any flavor - TSW or standard. I've yet to own a bad example.
In 9mm I'd also 2nd the 3906. Not made in extensive numbers and shares all the excellent qualities of the 4566. Good luck with the search! Regards 18DAI
__________________
7 +1 Rounds of hope & change
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
10-23-2013, 02:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: to close to Chicago
Posts: 676
Likes: 622
Liked 402 Times in 218 Posts
|
|
Here's another vote for the 4566 though I prefer the TSWs. A stainless gun in 9mm my vote is for the 5906tsw and you don't want a 5903tsw until I have mine. Since we all like pictures here's a couple.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|