|
|
11-21-2014, 07:38 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10
Likes: 1
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
S&W Model 39-2
A buddy of mine has gone back to his Smith semi-auto after a brief affair with a Glock. He likes the Smith's thin profile. I am looking at a Model 39-2. Are these reliable semi-autos? May be a dumb question but I have no experience with S&W semi-autos.
|
11-21-2014, 07:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
S&W 39-2
I picked one up last month and love it. I traded my Ruger SR9 for it. It has be reliable and accurate.
|
11-21-2014, 08:08 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Yes, the 39-2 is very reliable. I have several handguns which cover the spectrum from big to small. Included in the list is one 39-2 and one 639. I don't shoot eather one very much but have put at least a couple thousand rounds through each over the years.I do not recall a single time either one failed to fire and cycle correctly. Also, I think the 39-2 is one of the nicest looking "clasical" shape & feel handguns.
Last edited by Estimator; 11-21-2014 at 08:10 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-21-2014, 08:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Springfield, MA
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 1,986
Liked 440 Times in 228 Posts
|
|
My 39-2 has been very reliable. The only time I had issues was when the springs needed changing. After a new guide rod and magazine springs, it ran very well.. It'd be good to locate some spare parts though, as they are becoming hard to find. It took me a long time to locate a slide stop, until forum member PaulJ helped me out... overall I think they're one of the finest semi-autos ever produced!
|
11-21-2014, 08:27 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
39-2 Reply
Quote:
Originally Posted by 629Deerslayer
A buddy of mine has gone back to his Smith semi-auto after a brief affair with a Glock. He likes the Smith's thin profile. I am looking at a Model 39-2. Are these reliable semi-autos? May be a dumb question but I have no experience with S&W semi-autos.
|
Ps-I can't help but add that your question is not a "dumb" question. It is probably one of the most important questions you could ask. The "dumb" questions are the ones that we are too embaressed, or otherwise reluctant, to ask.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-21-2014, 08:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: kentucky
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 1,142
Liked 427 Times in 300 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 629Deerslayer
A buddy of mine has gone back to his Smith semi-auto after a brief affair with a Glock. He likes the Smith's thin profile. I am looking at a Model 39-2. Are these reliable semi-autos? May be a dumb question but I have no experience with S&W semi-autos.
|
Life is short buy the gun.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-21-2014, 09:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10
Likes: 1
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Thanks for the fast replies. I really like the looks of this semi auto. My Xmas present to me.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-21-2014, 09:46 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Montana
Posts: 5,162
Likes: 3,433
Liked 6,245 Times in 2,061 Posts
|
|
Don't do it!!!!
It will lead to a lifelong obsession....and we ALL know it!!
Randy
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-23-2014, 06:44 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Liked 75 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Estimator
Ps-I can't help but add that your question is not a "dumb" question. It is probably one of the most important questions you could ask. The "dumb" questions are the ones that we are too embaressed, or otherwise reluctant, to ask.
|
There is no such thing as a dumb qustion! Only dump answers!
|
11-23-2014, 09:01 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,023
Likes: 6,228
Liked 4,828 Times in 1,867 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Estimator
Yes, the 39-2 is very reliable. I have several handguns which cover the spectrum from big to small. Included in the list is one 39-2 and one 639. I don't shoot eather one very much but have put at least a couple thousand rounds through each over the years.I do not recall a single time either one failed to fire and cycle correctly. Also, I think the 39-2 is one of the nicest looking "clasical" shape & feel handguns.
|
Aside from being one of the prettiest pistols ever produced, it also feels great in the hand (for me). I typically carry a 3913, but only because I don't want to beat my 39-2 up!
__________________
Because of the metric system?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-23-2014, 09:29 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
I own one, and my boy owned one. I love the gun... It is fun to shoot, reliable, and easy to take down, especially if you have experience with 1911s (easier in my opinion).
Would be nice if it was reasonably easy to replace the sight for a night sight. Other then that, I love the gun !!!
|
11-23-2014, 03:59 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Daytona Beach, Fla.
Posts: 449
Likes: 983
Liked 651 Times in 244 Posts
|
|
I recently bought a "rescue" 39-2 that wasn't terribly beat up but had been carried by an LEO and therefore had holster wear as well as a fairly well-used trigger.
Given its A126xxx serial number (which most piqued my interest) it is an early, early 1971-likely 39-2.
Took it to the range a couple of days later and worked like a dream, most likely because it'd been long ago pushed through its run-in barrier.
The LGS salesman said the now-retired LEO had opted to keep the gun because he was comfortable with it and despite numerous departmental "upgrades" over the years.
"Why did he sell it?" I wondered aloud?
"He traded it; we had a really nice-looking one at about the same serial number," came the answer from the paperwork-buried salesman.
"And you guys didn't call me first!?" I shot back.
Well, at least the LEO's now previous 39-2 went to a good home.
I think.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-24-2014, 01:16 AM
|
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,581
Likes: 13,500
Liked 6,743 Times in 2,526 Posts
|
|
DCW: Does your early 39-2 have a Model 39 barrel in it (stamped 9mm CTG instead of 9MM; and with a hump in the middle of the feed ramp)? Mine does, at SN A125XXX. I think they were using up Model 39 parts, and I wonder if this lasted until A 126XXX
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-24-2014, 02:29 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: N GA
Posts: 4,466
Likes: 204
Liked 3,613 Times in 1,498 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smith-Nut
There is no such thing as a dumb qustion! Only dump answers!
|
Just what exactly is a "dump" answer??
Sorry, just couldn't resist!
I know, I know, he said "qustion" too!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-24-2014, 04:22 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Sterling,IL
Posts: 943
Likes: 2,523
Liked 1,122 Times in 525 Posts
|
|
The 39-2 is a great pistol. Mine still shoots very well and I've owned it since 1980. It is some what worn as I carried it as a Deputy Sheriff many years ago. After you shot one will want more,I still take mine out and punch paper with it.
|
11-24-2014, 11:39 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 3,724
Liked 2,321 Times in 998 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 629Deerslayer
Thanks for the fast replies. I really like the looks of this semi auto. My Xmas present to me.
|
Good move!
I gave myself this one for Christmas back in 1975:
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-25-2014, 12:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Liked 75 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KEN L
Just what exactly is a "dump" answer??
Sorry, just couldn't resist!
I know, I know, he said "qustion" too!
|
First thing I learned over 30 years ago, when I started in the army was excatly what I write above.
Sometimes we don't want to put a qustion because we think all the other people we are with, will think our qustion is stupid. If we dare and do actually put the qustion and the instructor, teacher or whom ever is responsebel for answering the qustion then mog us. Excample:
Qustion: "Is the S&W M 39 a revolver or a pistol?"
Answer (stupid): "Did you sleep through all of your draft period."
So stating that there is only stupid answers is to show that no one should mog any one daring putting a qustion even though most people finds the answer so obiusly that any one should know.
Excuse my poor english
|
11-25-2014, 12:13 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Illinois
Posts: 253
Likes: 438
Liked 246 Times in 125 Posts
|
|
I don't have a 39, but I have a 59 and it would take a lot to get it out of my hands....
|
11-25-2014, 06:37 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: New England
Posts: 239
Likes: 483
Liked 235 Times in 107 Posts
|
|
got this on around 1970... new.
Traded it about 2 years ago for something smaller.
My CS9.
My barrel had the "hump" in the feed ramp and wouldn't feed hollowpoint ammo. A little judicious stoning and it would feed anything.
|
11-25-2014, 06:52 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Lubbock, Tx
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Don't pass up the opprotunity
By all means, go for it!
I carried one when I was a civilian police officer (1975-76).
When I went back into USAF, I sold it (Looking back on that- really a dumb move.).
Several years later I managed to purchase another 39-2 (1980) and I still have it.
Used to qualify for my CHL in both KS and TX, after moving to Tx.
Great pistol and very accurate and reliable!!!!
Bruce
|
11-25-2014, 06:53 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Lubbock, Tx
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Don't pass up the opprotunity
By all means, go for it!
I carried one when I was a civilian police officer (1975-76).
When I went back into USAF, I sold it (Looking back on that- really a dumb move.).
Several years later I managed to purchase another 39-2 (1980) and I still have it.
Used to qualify for my CHL in both KS and TX, after moving to Tx.
Great pistol and very accurate and reliable!!!!
Bruce
|
11-25-2014, 11:14 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The Great Midwest
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 1,716
Liked 2,367 Times in 1,003 Posts
|
|
Long time 3rd gen owner here but newer 1st gen owner with two 39-2's...both early 70's. I have to say I not only love the look and feel of the 39's but I also find them easier to shoot well...my best groups come from my 39's and 1911's. That's no surprise though as the 39 was designed to feel like a 1911 in the hand and has a very nice SA trigger.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-25-2014, 11:28 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 577
Likes: 1,477
Liked 1,345 Times in 276 Posts
|
|
As a brand new Deputy in 1975, I was issued a 39-2. I carried it 24/7 on and off duty for 4 years. Totally reliable. Great shooter. I loved that gun. One day, some departmental bean counter decided we should go to 66 revolvers.
I missed that gun. After I retired (32 years later) I decided I wanted one and found a pristine example which I now use as my carry gun just because it's still a great gun.
But wait there's more. I came across a nickel 59 (double stack 39) and had to have that too. Nostalgia is a beautiful thing!
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-30-2014, 09:49 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Daytona Beach, Fla.
Posts: 449
Likes: 983
Liked 651 Times in 244 Posts
|
|
Humping It
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyrano
DCW: Does your early 39-2 have a Model 39 barrel in it (stamped 9mm CTG instead of 9MM; and with a hump in the middle of the feed ramp)? Mine does, at SN A125XXX. I think they were using up Model 39 parts, and I wonder if this lasted until A 126XXX
|
Absolutely! The hump, along with a (pre-39/39-ish) hole through the hammer and the slide's "squiggly" cut where, when engaged, the slide stop, well, stops the slide are all among the reasons I jumped on it at the LGS.
Another of my somewhat early 39-2's (SN A184433) hasn't any of the things previously mentioned but, and here's the killer (logically, to most who don't know the S&W numbering system), SN No. A185514 has two of the three (feed-ramp hump's gone missing).
To me, it's the unique qualities of guns that make them special to me.
Earlier today, (Sun., 30 Nov. - apologies for the somewhat tardy response) I was thinking about a Star (Spanish) SM .380 I bought in 1971. It's a still-beautiful, shinny nickel that, despite its age, must have only three handling marks and, maybe, fewer than 100 rounds through it. It was a great back-up carry gun back in "the day" (when it was "my" day, that is).
And I still love it, almost reverentially.
Oh, I got a lot of hassle over it back then (when Smith & Wesson absolutely, positively ruled the LEO world) but it was comfortable just above the left ankle and it held a couple-more rounds than did my cohorts' snubnose revolvers.
Alas, my old age has again gone off on tangential pabulum.
DC
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
12-01-2014, 05:44 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The Great American Northw
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 197
Liked 453 Times in 167 Posts
|
|
Since the 1960's
As a young-pup police officer, I recognized the S&W 39 (not 39-2) was far superior to the Colt OP I was issued, so bought one new ($75.00) and carried it as an off-duty weapon. I tried unsuccessfully to get the department to switch, but the bosses thought I wanted to go to war. I sold that one...flat extractor...for the new extractor and have owned them ever since. I now have two 39-2s and four of the 3913s in slightly different configurations. If I was not retired and still in uniform, I'd carry a 1911 as my duty weapon and any of the 35-59s as a backup/OD. They're super guns!
__________________
Term limits!
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
12-02-2014, 03:18 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SE Wisc.
Posts: 3,489
Likes: 782
Liked 6,601 Times in 2,081 Posts
|
|
Trading the Glock for a S&W is the smartest thing one can do. I use the Model 39s big brother, the S&W Model 659 as my CCW. I like having the extra rounds if needed.
__________________
Bill
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|