I know this information has been discussed before so I hope nobody is annoyed with a re-hash but I have either somewhat conflicting information or inaccurate information.
On the earliest 3rd Gen pistols, the most obvious difference at first glance is arguably the non-Novak fixed rear sight. And I have "heard" that the reason for early 3rd Gens not having a Novak is because the licensing deal wasn't complete and was holding up the manufacture or production of pistols?
It seems hard to wrap my head around the idea that Wayne Novak would be a key part of the 3rd Gen design crew... but then "hold up" the issuance of the guns with his flagship (fantastic) rear sight.
So exactly what was the story there?
I think most of us agree that for how terrific all of the pistols are, the 3rd Gen is absolutely the pinnacle of an already fantastic design. In my opinion, the easiest way to show this to any one who might care is to put my 659 in their hands -- and then swap it out for my 5906. Oh don't get me wrong, I love my 659 but the 5906 is just so ergonomically superior to it that it's hard to imagine that they are kind of the "same" thing.