|
|
02-07-2016, 09:43 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 683
Likes: 176
Liked 385 Times in 164 Posts
|
|
4586 or CS45
I want something new to play with. Which would be better- a 4586 or a CS45? Which would be more collectible in the future? Both have box and docs.
Last edited by spistols; 02-07-2016 at 09:48 PM.
|
02-08-2016, 01:06 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: N.E. OKLA.
Posts: 6,484
Likes: 5,882
Liked 9,332 Times in 3,497 Posts
|
|
Those are two very different guns, as you must know, with two different purposes. DAO vs TDA, large vs small, heavy vs light. Both ran about eight years. The CS45 (blue or SS?) would probably have a wider appeal & might be worth more, but I think they were made cheaper (plastic sights & guide rods?) from the ones I saw, IIRC.
.
__________________
Waiting for the break of day
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-08-2016, 05:25 AM
|
Junior Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: MA
Posts: 7,707
Likes: 13,905
Liked 9,470 Times in 4,391 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spistols
I want something new to play with. Which would be better- a 4586 or a CS45? Which would be more collectible in the future? Both have box and docs.
|
Oh boy! Night and day different guns. I'd love to have both in my 3rd Gen collection, especially if as complete ( and probably clean) as your post suggests.
But the real question is: Which will fit better into your existing collection? Also, which is the better "deal" as compared to typical market values?
To me, they are both desirable if clean (not trashed), with box & papers, etc... and assuming attractively priced.
Not much help, am I?
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-08-2016, 09:17 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 683
Likes: 176
Liked 385 Times in 164 Posts
|
|
I did not realize the earlier versions differences of the CS45. Seems like the one I am looking at may have the plastic guide rod and rear site due to the no R/H safety and lack of cut out for one.
The one (CS45) I am eyeballing is stainless.
|
02-08-2016, 09:18 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 465
Liked 1,574 Times in 700 Posts
|
|
I bought all of my guns new, and take very good care of them. I carry a CS 45, and I love it. It is a great carry gun. That is the one I would vote for.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-08-2016, 09:26 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 296
Liked 785 Times in 356 Posts
|
|
If it is "something to play with" I presume you mean range fun and not concealed carry, in which case I would go for the soft shooting 4586. I have shot them both and while the CS45 was not unmanageable, it was not near as fun to poke holes in targets with as the 4586 was. I suspect if both are in identical condition with boxes that value would be similar with the CS45 (stainless) probably just a step out in front.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-08-2016, 12:31 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Occupied Colorado
Posts: 609
Likes: 384
Liked 660 Times in 236 Posts
|
|
I don't think that both guns fit both categories.
The 4586 would be more fun at the range, and I think the CS 45 would probably be worth more as a collectable.
The 4586's seem to sell pretty cheap but I think that they are a very underrated gun.
I purchased an ex Idaho State Police 4586 and now that the issues with it are worked out (Gummed up firing pin, bad magazine) its a very fun shooter. Better buy some magazines, because you will not be able to load them fast enough. You will also have a big grin on your face.
Light DAO trigger, feels great in the hand with the Hogue grips I put on it, and absolutely reliable now with any ammo I run through it.
As stated above, very soft shooting for a .45 Auto.
Something about the Smith design, my 457 has pretty soft recoil as well and its a compact, aluminum frame .45.
|
02-08-2016, 11:28 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Spanaway, Wa
Posts: 508
Likes: 869
Liked 371 Times in 181 Posts
|
|
I'm of no help. I always say both. Looking forward to seeing which one you get.
But like the others say, if just for play at the range, the big one, 4586.
|
02-09-2016, 11:40 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Morgan Co, IN
Posts: 667
Likes: 475
Liked 462 Times in 259 Posts
|
|
I think the CS45 might be a bit more collectible - that's my pick.
__________________
K & N S&W revolvers
|
02-09-2016, 11:58 AM
|
Junior Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: MA
Posts: 7,707
Likes: 13,905
Liked 9,470 Times in 4,391 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by twistedracer
I'm of no help. I always say both.
|
Maybe that's because "BOTH" is usually the correct answer to questions like that.
|
02-09-2016, 10:02 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: HOUSTON, TEXAS
Posts: 10,183
Likes: 7,176
Liked 14,375 Times in 5,412 Posts
|
|
CS45 a quality gun that is more accurate than any other 45 ACP its size
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-09-2016, 10:22 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Spanaway, Wa
Posts: 508
Likes: 869
Liked 371 Times in 181 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HOUSTON RICK
CS45 a quality gun that is more accurate than any other 45 ACP its size
|
I like that, nice.
|
02-11-2016, 01:33 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 649
Likes: 4,977
Liked 710 Times in 362 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HOUSTON RICK
CS45 a quality gun that is more accurate than any other 45 ACP its size
|
Almost, I found ONE that does do a slight bit better...
Star Firestar M45
Comparison...S&W CS45 vs Star M45
Altho, have to admit, when wearing the double-pouch Thunderwear or Smart Carry,
they both go for the ride, but with the Star in the Right position, the CS45 in the left.
__________________
Marlin & Calico Specialist
Last edited by Big Shrek; 02-11-2016 at 01:40 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-17-2016, 11:18 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Liked 42 Times in 16 Posts
|
|
I have never fired a CS45 but I carried a 4586 every day at work for 7 years. Our armorer had smoothed, but not lightened, the DAO pull so that it mimicked that of a smooth S&W revolver DA pull. It was an excellent sidearm and I liked it so much, I bought it after we switched to a black plastic import gun who's name will not be uttered. Great gun! I would be happy to switch back to it tomorrow if I was allowed.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-18-2016, 12:53 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 8,441
Likes: 2,498
Liked 13,179 Times in 4,572 Posts
|
|
I love my CS45. I used to carry it concealed routinely. I can't speak to the other gun having no experience with one. The CS45 is very accurate for such a little pistol. Whether it's collectable is a whole other question.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-18-2016, 07:45 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 683
Likes: 176
Liked 385 Times in 164 Posts
|
|
I really like the idea of a CS45 pistol, but truth be told, it just never fit my hand correctly, even with the pinky extension on the grip.
A 4516 fits much better to me and looks like it could work in the same holster as a 3953/3913.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|