|
|
04-26-2017, 03:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: California
Posts: 24
Likes: 7
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Model 61, 22 Lr
Any body else out there have one of these? Not S&W's finest hour. It was just so strange looking I took it on trade 30 or so years ago. 5 shoot semi 22 LR. little pocket gun, the barrel is fixed in frame and slide pulls action open for reloading. I haven't shot it in years it did work, no flaws except trying to remove mag you better be sure it's not loaded feels like you need 3 hands to pull mag out. I believe it was made in early 70's any info would be great
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-26-2017, 04:08 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,515
Likes: 1,178
Liked 18,468 Times in 7,306 Posts
|
|
I have one of the last engineering change (61-3).
I haven't figured out why they quit making them - unless the first two iterations (61-1 & 61-2) were a lot worse than the last version - and by the time they got it right the gun had a bad reputation and wouldn't sell. I know that kind of thing happened a lot with American products in the 70's and 80's.
Mine took a little tweaking of the magazines to get it to work 100%, but with the original magazine it has functioned at least as well as any of my other 22 semi-autos, and better than some. It cycles reliably and doesn't seem to be any pickier about ammo brands & bullet weights/types than any other semi-auto 22.
Maybe I just got lucky and got an exceptional one....
Last edited by BC38; 04-26-2017 at 04:10 PM.
|
04-26-2017, 05:17 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Battery Oaks Range, S.C.
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 5,663
Liked 3,574 Times in 1,163 Posts
|
|
I have one of the last versions.
No problems ever. Seems to defy physics. 0 recoil, none. Something strange about this design. Goes Bang x 5....no recoil.
|
04-26-2017, 07:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NE Seacoast, NH
Posts: 242
Likes: 248
Liked 336 Times in 131 Posts
|
|
I have its slightly bigger sibling, a 2214 made two decades later. It's not for sale or trade, 100% pure keeper... LGS has a 61-3 for sale. It would likely follow me home if I dared to take a closer look at it.
__________________
John
|
04-27-2017, 01:55 AM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 5,060
Likes: 739
Liked 3,275 Times in 1,282 Posts
|
|
I have had perhaps a half dozen of them over the years. Right now I am down to a 61-1, a 61-2, both blue, and a 61-3 nickel.
.22's can be picky about which ammo they like but, honestly, none of mine have ever made it through a 50 round box of anything without a stoppage of some kind, usually several and not always the same kind of jamb.
In his book THE HISTORY OF SMITH & WESSON, Roy Jinks the historian for the company says they discontinued the gun finally because it didn't seem to fit in with S&W's image as the maker of the world's finest handguns.
S&W resurrected the basic design for the Model 422 and variants, and those guns seem as reliable as a ball peen hammer.
Last edited by BUFF; 04-27-2017 at 01:56 AM.
|
10-11-2017, 02:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: California
Posts: 24
Likes: 7
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38
I have one of the last engineering change (61-3).
I haven't figured out why they quit making them - unless the first two iterations (61-1 & 61-2) were a lot worse than the last version - and by the time they got it right the gun had a bad reputation and wouldn't sell. I know that kind of thing happened a lot with American products in the 70's and 80's.
Mine took a little tweaking of the magazines to get it to work 100%, but with the original magazine it has functioned at least as well as any of my other 22 semi-autos, and better than some. It cycles reliably and doesn't seem to be any pickier about ammo brands & bullet weights/types than any other semi-auto 22.
Maybe I just got lucky and got an exceptional one....
|
Sorry new to forum just learning how this works. Mine is a 61-2 and it does not have a drop free magazine when empty. You have to turn it upside down hold the release button back and pull the mag out with other hand, hence my comment on needing 3 hands. It shoots any brand of ammo fine and is as accurate is you can expect from a 2 inch barrel, just hard to get mag out of gun. Does your -3 model drop the empty mag free?
|
10-11-2017, 04:53 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 7,345
Likes: 7,534
Liked 5,585 Times in 2,559 Posts
|
|
I got one when they first came out, several mags. Didn't work with CCI, worked fine with Remington HSHP, all mags. Just didn't like carrying a cocked striker-fired gun in my pocket.
|
10-11-2017, 07:37 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NE Seacoast, NH
Posts: 242
Likes: 248
Liked 336 Times in 131 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Model520Fan
I got one when they first came out, several mags. Didn't work with CCI, worked fine with Remington HSHP, all mags. Just didn't like carrying a cocked striker-fired gun in my pocket.
|
The 61 is a hammer fired gun. Also equipped with a safety. ??? You didn't like it cocked and locked...?
__________________
John
Last edited by indigo22; 10-11-2017 at 07:51 PM.
|
10-11-2017, 09:21 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 13,515
Likes: 1,178
Liked 18,468 Times in 7,306 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by arrow42157
Sorry new to forum just learning how this works. Mine is a 61-2 and it does not have a drop free magazine when empty. You have to turn it upside down hold the release button back and pull the mag out with other hand, hence my comment on needing 3 hands. It shoots any brand of ammo fine and is as accurate is you can expect from a 2 inch barrel, just hard to get mag out of gun. Does your -3 model drop the empty mag free?
|
I don't think any of the iterations have a mag that "drops free". The best way I have found to remove it is
1) Hold the gun in my right hand butt towards my body and barrel parallel to the ground and pointed to the left (top of the slide facing away from my body).
2) Hook the tip of the index finger of my left hand over the tip of the floorplate of the mag where it sticks out of the notch cut in the at the bottom of the front of the of the grip frame
3) Push the mag release rearwards with the thumb of my left hand
3) Pull downwards on the mag with the left index finger
It is much more difficult to describe than it is to do.
|
10-12-2017, 02:21 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: California
Posts: 24
Likes: 7
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BC38
I don't think any of the iterations have a mag that "drops free". The best way I have found to remove it is
1) Hold the gun in my right hand butt towards my body and barrel parallel to the ground and pointed to the left (top of the slide facing away from my body).
2) Hook the tip of the index finger of my left hand over the tip of the floorplate of the mag where it sticks out of the notch cut in the at the bottom of the front of the of the grip frame
3) Push the mag release rearwards with the thumb of my left hand
3) Pull downwards on the mag with the left index finger
It is much more difficult to describe than it is to do.
|
Yeah I know what you mean that is exactly how I finally figured out to be the best way to do it. I carried it for awhile on ankle as back up but got lucky enough to win a Kahr 380 at an Friends of NRA Banquet. So I think the 380 might be just a touch heavier but feel more prepared with the 380acp than the 22lr. But if the occasion arises I'm a wheel man at heart and strap the S&W 36 5 shot on, I also have a 60 in 38spl. but it's a 2 incher and my 36 has a 3 in barrel, maybe it's just me but that 1 more inch of barrel gives me about 20 more yards of accuracy.
|
10-12-2017, 02:30 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: California
Posts: 24
Likes: 7
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee's Landing Billy
I have one of the last versions.
No problems ever. Seems to defy physics. 0 recoil, none. Something strange about this design. Goes Bang x 5....no recoil.
|
Yep they are fun to shoot, maybe I just got lucky too but I don't remember ever having a malfunction problem, it's just my ability or lack of I guess to shoot it very accurately,most of the time I feel like I would be better throwing rocks..ha. My Grandsons can shoot it much better than me, I guess that's what happens when you get old. Not to bag on this gun I have the same problem with all my 2in. barrel handguns
|
10-12-2017, 06:05 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NOVA
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 5,601
Liked 1,381 Times in 581 Posts
|
|
Not that 2213/2214 mags are all that available - but I wonder if those would work as extended mags in a Model 61? I've had mine for over 40 years but have very few rounds thru it. I greatly damaged the collector value - many years ago - by crudely removing the mag safety spring thingy ...
|
10-15-2017, 03:54 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 7,345
Likes: 7,534
Liked 5,585 Times in 2,559 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by indigo22
The 61 is a hammer fired gun. Also equipped with a safety. ??? You didn't like it cocked and locked...?
|
Yes, it is fired by a concealed hammer (out of sight, out of mind). No, I didn't like it cocked and locked.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|