Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols > Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols

Notices

Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols Other Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols from the 1950's to Present


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-02-2018, 10:13 AM
SHOOT1SAM SHOOT1SAM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: IDAHO
Posts: 164
Likes: 34
Liked 144 Times in 61 Posts
Default 457: 2nd gen. or 3rd gen.?

I think I know but would appreciate clarification. Is the 457 a 2nd or 3rd generation pistol?

For the record, I think it’s a 3rd.

Sam
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-02-2018, 10:20 AM
GaryS's Avatar
GaryS GaryS is offline
Member
457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.?  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 11,364
Likes: 9,381
Liked 17,297 Times in 6,648 Posts
Default

It's a 3rd Gen "Value Line" gun. 3rd Gen guts, but with less machining to smooth the edges, some plastic parts, and not as good a finish.

Most, but not all, 3rd Gen parts will fit. The sights, recoil guide rod, and magazine release mechanism are plastic.
__________________
Can open, worms everywhere.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-02-2018, 01:48 PM
Sevens Sevens is offline
Member
457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.?  
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,856
Likes: 9,471
Liked 14,855 Times in 5,050 Posts
Default

The 3rd Gen "Value Line" guns have been confusing the gun buying public since the day they were put on the market. Here's a quick rundown of what they are:

First released were the 915 and 411. These pistols were closely related to the 5904 and the 4004. Smith & Wesson wanted to produce a line of 3rd Gen pistols with lowered MSRP's to compete with the onslaught of polymer frame pistols in the early 1990's.

So they took their flagship duty pistols (the 5906 and 4006) and instead of stainless with stainless frame, they made them black and with a black anodized alloy frame. They did not use the trademarked and expensive Novak sights, they used a cheaper plastic copy. They did not have ambi thumb decocker. The finish on each pistol is low cost and not exactly durable. On the 915, they revised the frame and eliminated the stepped side. And they lowered the price to the buying public.

These pistols sold very well but someone at S&W, probably an accountant must have decided that S&W simply hadn't cut ENOUGH costs in manufacturing with these two models. They were only produced for 2 or 3 years... but at least in the case of the 915, a zillion were made. (the 411 seems a bit more scarce)

So S&W took a second swipe at "Value Line" pistols and they made the 908, the 909, the 910, the 410 and the 457. And as a side note -- the 910 and 410 were marketed after the Clinton Crime Bill went live, so they also shipped with 10-round limit magazines. And that is a side-clue as to what you are looking at. A 915 is a "9mm" with "15 rounds", a 411 is a ".40" with "11 rounds." And the 910 is a "9mm with 10rds" and a 410 is a ".40cal with 10rds." And the 908 (8rds) and the 909 (9 rounds) and the 457 (7rds) and now... if you aren't confused, you can figure out exactly which gun is being discussed by the model name/number.

These guns are cheaper versions of the 3914, the 3904, the 4004 and the 4516 respectively. And with this next group of "Value Line", S&W succeeded in lowering their costs even more. The most obvious difference in all of these are the much more blocky looking slides that have less machining done to them. A number of small parts inside went from metal to plastic.

But both stages of Value Line guns were given three digit model numbers and it makes you wonder if this was some kind of psychological marketing scheme -- trying to make the buying public believe they were spending a little less to get some "older models", I don't know. I personally think it was an ignorant idea to give them 3-digit model names, but then again... I also think it was ignorant to cheap them down as much as they chose to do with the second wave of Value Line.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 10-02-2018, 01:50 PM
Sevens Sevens is offline
Member
457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.?  
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,856
Likes: 9,471
Liked 14,855 Times in 5,050 Posts
Default

Hahaha, just want to say for the record that it took me a WHILE to figure this out a couple years ago. I definitely wasn't paying attention to these guns in the mid-1990's. I was shooting a 1006 back then, but I didn't mess with S&W 9mm and .40cal pistols at that time.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-02-2018, 02:02 PM
Jeppo's Avatar
Jeppo Jeppo is offline
SWCA Member
457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.?  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Davidson County, NC
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 7,810
Liked 4,140 Times in 1,416 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryS View Post
The sights, recoil guide rod, and magazine release mechanism are plastic.
The disconnector is plastic too (at least in the 908). Guess how I know.

Last edited by Jeppo; 10-02-2018 at 03:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 10-03-2018, 09:04 AM
SHOOT1SAM SHOOT1SAM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: IDAHO
Posts: 164
Likes: 34
Liked 144 Times in 61 Posts
Default

Thank you all for the replies. In searching the forum, it seems like the ‘value line’ 457’s are very well regarded...can those less-expensive parts (disconnector, guide rod, mag. release, etc.) be easily replaced (availability?) by Standard metal parts?

Sam
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 10-03-2018, 09:38 AM
URIT URIT is offline
Member
457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.?  
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: New Bern NC
Posts: 2,475
Likes: 7,505
Liked 2,357 Times in 1,112 Posts
Default

Here is a guide to some of the more popular S&W semi-automatics. I bookmarked it for quick reference.

https://www.luckygunner.com/lounge/g...omatic-models/
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-03-2018, 07:47 PM
barbara_em barbara_em is offline
Member
457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.?  
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 205
Likes: 323
Liked 380 Times in 136 Posts
Default

I don't know where I found this page; it's been sitting on my laptop a long time. I like the 909 because of the curved backstrap, reminiscent of the model 39. Just can't seem to find one.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg value line.jpg (112.2 KB, 28 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 10-03-2018, 08:37 PM
18DAI's Avatar
18DAI 18DAI is offline
Absent Comrade
457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.?  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: GSO NC
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 23,604
Liked 13,195 Times in 2,860 Posts
Default

SHOOT1SAM Yes, the nylon/plastic parts can be replaced. All except the mag release button.

The 457 uses a different mag catch than the non value line 45s. And the plastic button on it is a one time use part. Once you pull it off, you meed a new one to replace it.

As a long time user/admirer of the 457 I will opine that other than the plastic sights - of which I am on my 2nd rear sight due to banging i to things like car doors and counter corners, I would not bother to replace any other parts.

I have experienced no problems or breakages in many thousands of rounds. The tip of the nylon guide rod occasionally gets a little "string" coming off it from wear. I simply take an emory board to it and lightly file it off. No issues with the gun to date.

Enjoy that fine 45! Probably the most underated 45 compact.....although it really isnt all that compact out there. Mas Ayoob said in his review of the 457 that; "...it is a lot of bang for your buck!". I agree. Strongly! Regards 18DAI
__________________
7 +1 Rounds of hope & change
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 10-03-2018, 09:12 PM
Warren Sear's Avatar
Warren Sear Warren Sear is offline
Member
457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.? 457:  2nd gen. or 3rd gen.?  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Twin Cites, Minnesota
Posts: 5,154
Likes: 10,997
Liked 10,883 Times in 3,281 Posts
Default

I have two 457s, and I like them both. Never a problem of any kind with either of them.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 100_3864.jpg (121.8 KB, 24 views)
File Type: jpg 100_3865.jpg (114.7 KB, 29 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #11  
Old 10-04-2018, 06:34 AM
SHOOT1SAM SHOOT1SAM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: IDAHO
Posts: 164
Likes: 34
Liked 144 Times in 61 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by URIT View Post
Here is a guide to some of the more popular S&W semi-automatics. I bookmarked it for quick reference.

https://www.luckygunner.com/lounge/g...omatic-models/
Thanks, URIT; I had seen that before-I think what threw me was the 3 digit model number.

Sam
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:17 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)