|
|
04-06-2020, 12:39 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: western NY
Posts: 720
Likes: 287
Liked 999 Times in 306 Posts
|
|
669
Found these pics when I was going through some old stuff. This was a period when I had been transferred from being a United States Customs Inspector to a United States Customs Special Agent. Before I had officially completed Special Agent training, they issued us a generic "Customs Officer" badge, rather than the Inspector or Special Agent badge.
But the reason for my post is the 669. I hated that gun. Felt like holding a 2" x 4" in my hand. Of course, they had just taken away the CS-1's from us, and many of us truly liked that gun. I went for the next ten years or so alternating between carrying my model 66 "F-comp" and my 1086. (At the time, you could qualify with your personally owned weapon.) Then we went Glock crazy. Then we went Sig crazy (that's when I retired!) I was a firearms instructor the entire time. Still carry the "F-comp."
Last edited by 10mmauto; 04-06-2020 at 12:42 PM.
Reason: spelling
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-07-2020, 08:59 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8,777
Likes: 19,550
Liked 11,881 Times in 5,393 Posts
|
|
The Model 469/669 had few shortcomings, relatively small sights being the biggest issue, trigger actions that ranged from good to gritty, and the grip being another issue. The grip of the 469/669 is considered to be better than that of the Models 59/459/559/659, but the plastic stocks tended to be a little slippery. Even the one-piece Delrin stocks on the 3rd gen pistols tend to be a little slick.
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-07-2020, 10:50 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: A Burb of the Burgh
Posts: 14,788
Likes: 1,672
Liked 19,897 Times in 8,797 Posts
|
|
Like you I hated the 2X4 grip of the 469..... but that was all there was in the mid-80s...... traded mine as soon as I handled a 6906.
Then traded that 6906 with square trigger guard for the first round trigger guard gun in the LGS.
While I like the 4" 686 a lot ..... for concealed carry I prefer my 3" 66 k-frame
Last edited by BAM-BAM; 04-07-2020 at 10:52 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-07-2020, 12:01 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Crawford County PA
Posts: 3,710
Likes: 4,394
Liked 6,713 Times in 2,420 Posts
|
|
I had to have a 469 as soon as they came out. Just didn't ever warm up to it, grip, sights, I don't remember. A couple of years ago I found one in the box and bought it.
__________________
Made it, Ma! Top of the world!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-07-2020, 12:05 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: PALM BEACH FLORIDA
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 15
Liked 749 Times in 422 Posts
|
|
I had a 469 when they were being sold new, & hated it. Sold it after a month. Last year my work took one in, & after putting proper hammers in my 3913,& 4516, I realized I could save this 469 for $300. It now has a proper hammer, so the first round is easily SA, which makes it a totally different gun from the one I owned decades ago. GARY.
Last edited by N4KVE; 04-07-2020 at 04:50 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-07-2020, 02:43 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 1,260
Liked 2,533 Times in 859 Posts
|
|
Personally, I like my 469. I don't consider the grip "2x4" because pretty much every double stack 9mm feels about the same. The sights certainly need improvement. The double action takes some getting used to through training, as does the transition from DA to SA. But remember, this was the 1980s. DA/SA double stack 9s were the rage.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-07-2020, 05:03 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: western NY
Posts: 720
Likes: 287
Liked 999 Times in 306 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAM-BAM
Like you I hated the 2X4 grip of the 469..... but that was all there was in the mid-80s...... traded mine as soon as I handled a 6906.
Then traded that 6906 with square trigger guard for the first round trigger guard gun in the LGS.
While I like the 4" 686 a lot ..... for concealed carry I prefer my 3" 66 k-frame
|
The CS-1's we had were 3" guns, but very heavy. No comparison to my 3" 66 F-Comp.
|
04-07-2020, 05:05 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: western NY
Posts: 720
Likes: 287
Liked 999 Times in 306 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borderboss
Personally, I like my 469. I don't consider the grip "2x4" because pretty much every double stack 9mm feels about the same. The sights certainly need improvement. The double action takes some getting used to through training, as does the transition from DA to SA. But remember, this was the 1980s. DA/SA double stack 9s were the rage.
|
I agree with you to a point, but I thought the 669 just exaggerated the feeling a little bit. But it also could have been me, since I didn't like the gun overall anyway!
|
04-08-2020, 10:25 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 16
Likes: 59
Liked 13 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
I bought my 469 new and it is my current carry gun. I have been on the look-out for a third gen stainless model mostly for the improved trigger. I guess I’m cool with the 2x4 grip. There are certainly some newer pistols that I have not tried that are better, but I am used to the 469 with its DA/SA. Add stainless and a better trigger and leave everything else the same, that would be alright with me.
|
04-13-2020, 06:17 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 3,954
Liked 2,804 Times in 998 Posts
|
|
I had a 669 for a while. Hated it. It took two men and a government mule to pull the trigger, which felt, and sounded, like it had a bucket of gravel in it.
|
04-13-2020, 06:56 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tulsa County
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 1,644
Liked 3,135 Times in 1,146 Posts
|
|
I traded into a Model 469 and a bunch of 9mm ammo last year (I think). I collected some extra magazines and adapters and carried it for a while. I removed the magazine safety and found a "one size fits most" holster that worked well. I recently gave it to my grandson since he was having problems finding a decent holster for his Makarov 9X18mm. He's pleased, and that pleases me.
__________________
CPT, Armor (Ret)
Luke 22:36
Last edited by elm_creek_smith; 04-13-2020 at 06:59 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-14-2020, 08:41 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8,777
Likes: 19,550
Liked 11,881 Times in 5,393 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lt JL
I had a 669 for a while. Hated it. It took two men and a government mule to pull the trigger, which felt, and sounded, like it had a bucket of gravel in it.
|
One of the biggest issues of the S&W line of metal receiver pistols was the wide variation in the quality of the trigger pull. MIM fire control parts are very uniform and smooth, so the late production 3rd gen pistols usually have really smooth double action pulls and crisp single action pulls. The pre-MIM pistols ranged from very nice (fresh cutters on the milling machines) to atrocious (worn/chipped cutters in need of or even beyond needing replacement).
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA
|
04-14-2020, 11:02 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NC Montana
Posts: 853
Likes: 90
Liked 483 Times in 201 Posts
|
|
I bought a 669 shortly after they came out. The right ambi-safety lever was attached by a Philips screw affair. Cheesy. Sights were terrible. Pebble grips were awful -- I covered them with a Hogue rubber slip-on grip cover. Least accurate 9MM I ever owned. Very reliable, though. I carried it for a while -- never completely comfortable with it. It got stolen and I replaced it with a 3913LS. I still like that one.
|
04-14-2020, 01:34 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Southern FL, East side.
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 2,331
Liked 3,030 Times in 1,261 Posts
|
|
I also bought a 669 when they first came out. I found it to be more accurate than my slightly older 659. It served me well for many years.
I still have it although I usually carry plastic now. My 669 is definitely a shooter as it's beat to heck but it still works well.
Yeah the grip never felt the greatest but I think that is just a comfort thing and has no effect on accuracy or performance. It's not like there is much recoil to deal with. The grip angle is fine. They were great guns for their day and are still very capable.
I wouldn't go out of my way to get another one but if I found a steal on a nice fresher looking one with less mileage wear I'd be interested.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
My first 3rd gen - 6906
|
357-RevolverGuy |
Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols |
15 |
08-21-2017 10:52 PM |
6906 hammer in a 669 with 6906 frame?
|
imarangemaster |
Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols |
0 |
02-17-2015 12:06 AM |
6906 -- DAO?
|
GRT3031 |
Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols |
8 |
04-16-2011 12:21 AM |
6906
|
jumbeaux |
Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols |
6 |
04-12-2011 06:52 AM |
669 vs 6906
|
Cujohunter |
Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols |
4 |
03-30-2011 10:47 PM |
|