Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols > Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols

Notices

Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols Other Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols from the 1950's to Present


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-17-2020, 01:47 AM
4T5GUY's Avatar
4T5GUY 4T5GUY is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 1,856
Likes: 3,555
Liked 4,886 Times in 1,492 Posts
Default Why weren’t there any 4513’s?

OK before I get jumped on I’m talking about a 4513. I’m not talking about the 4513TSW, the 4513 45TSW, or the 45 Recon’s and or Shorty’s.

I recently picked up a 4013, (not a 4013TSW, 4013 40TSW.)

It is a very nice pistol even if it’s a .40 caliber. It seems to be a perfect balance between weight and caliber.

I’m just wondering why S&W never made a 4513. My early 4013 left in 1991, (according to the box,) and S&W started production of the 4516’s in 1990. Why didn’t they make the same in .45? It would have been a great option, (and I’m assuming a big seller,) but they waited 5 years to sorta do it in the 6rnd 4513TSW. Were they just trying to “push” .40 sales since the .45 offerings were doing so good?

Jim
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 05-17-2020, 06:39 AM
18DAI's Avatar
18DAI 18DAI is offline
Absent Comrade
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: GSO NC
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 23,604
Liked 13,195 Times in 2,860 Posts
Default

Good question. Gun rag writers at the time were asking the same thing. And pressuring the company to provide a compact lightweight 45.

IIRC, S&W wasn't sure the aluminum frames would hold up to a lot of shooting. So they spent a lot of time, years, testing to make sure. The 457 and the Shorty 45 hit the market first, again IIRC. I have a copy of a 1996....or 1997? Combat Handguns article that detailed the making of the guns.

The 4513TSW wasn't mentioned. At all. I think the 1st time I learned about the 4513TSW was from a hand out sheet at the local S&W LE dealer. And they were hard to get. At the time I was carrying a 4516. I had a standing order at the shop for a 4513TSW. Took a few years to get one.

Oldtimers is acting up, but thats how I remember it. And I do recall the 7 round 4513TSW being pretty plentiful back in the day. My gunsmith did a lot of business dropping the stupid rails off them and plugging the holes in the dustcover with plastic plugs.

I agree with you. A rail free aluminum framed 4516 would have been a good seller. But the 457 value line gun was what they ran with. Regards 18DAI
__________________
7 +1 Rounds of hope & change
Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 05-17-2020, 02:35 PM
4T5GUY's Avatar
4T5GUY 4T5GUY is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 1,856
Likes: 3,555
Liked 4,886 Times in 1,492 Posts
Default

I’m sure an aluminum framed .45 was a concern for S&W not really knowing long term effects. Heck I was apprehensive about aluminum frames to begin with too. (Not as much as PLASTIC frames “back then” when they first came out. )

Jim
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 05-17-2020, 02:46 PM
Fastbolt's Avatar
Fastbolt Fastbolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: CA Central Coast
Posts: 4,647
Likes: 920
Liked 6,615 Times in 2,198 Posts
Default

Back in '98 they told us at an armorer class that S&W was just wrapping up their exhaustive R&D and finalizing the aluminum-framed .45 compact.

We were told they'd decided to offer a standard model compact and then a more refined compact, and that their marketing studies indicated people (especially cops) wanted something a lot lighter than the 4516 for a compact.

I ordered my CS45 in mid-'99 when the stainless (slide) version was released. I'd previously handled a friend's early production CS45 in black, as well as his CS9 (also in black), which he'd bought at the same time. Neat little guns, but I'd decided to wait until the stainless models were being shipped.

Then, toward the end of '99 I also ordered and received a 4513TSW, because I didn't want the early carbon steel 457 (and the 457S wasn't yet being offered). Hey, I'm lazy and wanted stainless.

It wasn't until the next year (2000) that I decided to add a .40 compact, but by that time it meant I ended up with the railed 4013TSW.

I was in my early 3rd gen acquisition phase in those years, having started when I ordered a 3913 in '98. I was buying a mix of metal and plastic from 2000 on. I finally ordered a CS9 in '02, and I think the last 3rd gen's I bought were a T&E 4040PD ('06), and then a 3913TSW, as a former duty weapon ('15).

The various T&E and former duty weapon choices I could've bought included the early production 5903/6906's, late production 4003/06TSW's, 4563/66TSW's, 4013TSW, 4513TSW & that 4040PD. I probably ought to have bought the 4563TSW T&W model, but I was more interested in the 4040. I still sometimes kick myself over that one.

I never got interested in ordering any of the larger 3rd gen's, having had my fill of carrying the larger ones as issued weapons since '90. However, another one of my regrets was not ordering a late model 6906 before they suddenly ceased production, dammit. Comes to that, in retrospect I wish I'd not turned up my nose at ordering a 3906 before they went out-of-production.

Oh well.

Now, if only they'd made an all-stainless 3916, or even a 3916TSW, double dammit.
__________________
Ret LE Firearms inst & armorer
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any military who weren't shooting instructors? Rastoff The Lounge 50 09-02-2015 10:16 AM
Why weren't Model 60's made with 4" barrels? Triggernosis S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 3 05-18-2013 08:08 PM
Anti-Gunners They'd be more funny if they weren't after my guns. DigiRebel The Lounge 21 04-10-2013 07:21 AM
At least they weren't made in China Evil Dog The Lounge 34 06-05-2012 08:48 AM
As if things weren't hard enough .... Frostback The Lounge 11 05-15-2010 08:21 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)