Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols > Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols

Notices

Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols Other Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols from the 1950's to Present


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-13-2021, 05:19 PM
Jon Payne Jon Payne is offline
Member
The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't  
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 1 Post
Default The 659 that Wasn't

I have acquired a 659 that for all intents and purposes is a 5906. I'm certain it has a 3rd Gen Frame even though it's marked 659. The stocks are one piece unlike the normal 659. The slide has no barrel bushing, the sights are dove tailed fixed front and rear. The safety/hammer drop on the right side of the slide is secured with a Philips head screw. It does have half-cock unlike the other 5906's I've handled. Is this a transitional model?
Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 09-13-2021, 05:22 PM
robrossk robrossk is offline
US Veteran
The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 3,727
Liked 1,709 Times in 681 Posts
Default

Welcome to the forum. I am sure the experts will chime in shortly
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-13-2021, 06:00 PM
JohnHL JohnHL is offline
SWCA Member
The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't  
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Foothills of the Ozarks
Posts: 3,596
Likes: 10,670
Liked 5,588 Times in 2,179 Posts
Default

Based upon the configuration, it very likely is a transitional model.

Sometimes the three letter prefix of the serial number can confirm this.

John
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-13-2021, 06:06 PM
Jon Payne Jon Payne is offline
Member
The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't  
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnHL View Post
Based upon the configuration, it very likely is a transitional model.

Sometimes the three letter prefix of the serial number can confirm this.

John
The prefix is TBVxxxx. Is there extra interest in these because of rarity etc?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-13-2021, 08:17 PM
Jon Payne Jon Payne is offline
Member
The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't  
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 1 Post
Default

From the searches I've done here, I'm thinking "Pilot Model".
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-13-2021, 08:19 PM
JohnHL JohnHL is offline
SWCA Member
The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't  
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Foothills of the Ozarks
Posts: 3,596
Likes: 10,670
Liked 5,588 Times in 2,179 Posts
Default

Yes, although usually, the premium paid for one over a regular production model in the same condition is relatively small.

Still cool to have!

John
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-13-2021, 09:18 PM
Sevens Sevens is offline
Member
The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't  
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,856
Likes: 9,472
Liked 14,858 Times in 5,050 Posts
Default

Totally agree with JohnHL — but want to add that for the select few folks that collect specifically these, the original box with end label to help identify them.

Without the original box, they don’t often tend to bring much of a premium unless they wear the “AIP” serial prefix.

However I also agree with others who have said that experts will be along shortly with more info.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-13-2021, 09:29 PM
4T5GUY's Avatar
4T5GUY 4T5GUY is offline
Member
The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't  
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 1,856
Likes: 3,555
Liked 4,886 Times in 1,492 Posts
Default

I’ve got another one that “wasn’t”.

When I called S&W C.S., (years ago,) I was told my 669 was shipped in 1992. I mentioned that 669’s had been superseded with 6906’s by then. The only info they had was a 1992 shipping date.

I don’t know how it worked but it might have been sent back with a cracked frame for repair. I don’t know why the 6906 frame would have had the original 669 model/serial number duplicated on it though. It seems that there should have been an earlier shipping date in the records.

Jim
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 591D25D7-A257-4892-8F98-FF07911E41B1.jpg (74.7 KB, 52 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 09-13-2021, 10:29 PM
snw19_357's Avatar
snw19_357 snw19_357 is offline
Moderator
The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't  
Join Date: May 2006
Location: N.AZ
Posts: 3,873
Likes: 614
Liked 2,399 Times in 595 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4T5GUY View Post
When I called S&W C.S., (years ago,) I was told my 669 was shipped in 1992. I mentioned that 669’s had been superseded with 6906’s by then. The only info they had was a 1992 shipping date.
Depending on how long ago you called, I have had reps that just look it up in the SCS&W instead of checking their computers.
It does look to have a TCA (or TDA?) prefix which would put it into the 3rd gen range.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4T5GUY View Post
I don’t know how it worked but it might have been sent back with a cracked frame for repair. I don’t know why the 6906 frame would have had the original 669 model/serial number duplicated on it though.
That is what I first thought and they would have put the original serial number on the frame, they couldn’t send a ‘different gun/serial number’ back without going through an FFL. But, both a TCA and TDA should have a square guard.
Although they didn’t use serial numbers in order or to exhaustion, I have seen late 69 series pistols with the round guard in the TDx range but they were etched, not stamped.
Interesting pistol.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Payne View Post
The prefix is TBVxxxx. Is there extra interest in these because of rarity etc?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Payne View Post
From the searches I've done here, I'm thinking "Pilot Model".
Most of the pilot guns were in the TBY’s and were all 3rd gen parts but it’s not regular 3rd gen production.
It’s interesting to see the red ‘safe’ dot on the slide (2nd gen) but with the pressed in bushing and dovetailed sights.

Cool pistols!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 09-13-2021, 11:08 PM
4T5GUY's Avatar
4T5GUY 4T5GUY is offline
Member
The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't  
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 1,856
Likes: 3,555
Liked 4,886 Times in 1,492 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snw19_357 View Post
It does look to have a TCA (or TDA?) prefix which would put it into the 3rd gen range.
Nope, it’s TAH with two safety indentations, one being red on the frame.

I’m glad I’m not going to be accused of drifting/hijacking the original post since I’m responding to a Mod.

Jim
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 18F0557A-7ADD-4A60-A58F-2F92E2D58DFB.jpg (46.7 KB, 34 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 09-13-2021, 11:35 PM
snw19_357's Avatar
snw19_357 snw19_357 is offline
Moderator
The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't  
Join Date: May 2006
Location: N.AZ
Posts: 3,873
Likes: 614
Liked 2,399 Times in 595 Posts
Default

No, but I will be.

TAH is definitely a 2nd gen serial number so I'm really thinkin cracked frame now. (but the '92 ship date...)

Jon Payne, would you post a picture of the muzzle/barrel bushing? I guess they machine for the separate barrel bushing AFTER the dimple for the red safety dot.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #12  
Old 09-14-2021, 12:02 AM
hammy5150 hammy5150 is offline
Member
The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't  
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Northern California
Posts: 233
Likes: 142
Liked 255 Times in 110 Posts
Default

When did 2nd Gen production really stop? I imagine it probably went like 3rd Gen production for a couple of years where it dragged on to fill straggler LE orders and warranty replacements even after they had stopped being offered commercially.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-14-2021, 12:33 PM
Green Frog Green Frog is offline
Member
The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central VA
Posts: 8,657
Likes: 1,569
Liked 9,427 Times in 4,225 Posts
Default

How about the difference in the slide forging between the forged in front sight on the 659 and the dovetail In thicker metal) on the 5906? Is there actually enough steel in the 659 to cut a dovetail??

Froggie
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-15-2021, 05:50 PM
xtrtsqrt11 xtrtsqrt11 is offline
Member
The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't The 659 that Wasn't  
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 185
Likes: 177
Liked 229 Times in 108 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4T5GUY View Post
I’ve got another one that “wasn’t”.

When I called S&W C.S., (years ago,) I was told my 669 was shipped in 1992. I mentioned that 669’s had been superseded with 6906’s by then. The only info they had was a 1992 shipping date.

I don’t know how it worked but it might have been sent back with a cracked frame for repair. I don’t know why the 6906 frame would have had the original 669 model/serial number duplicated on it though. It seems that there should have been an earlier shipping date in the records.

Jim
You never know. One bit of info though, I had a 669 about 23 years ago that I traded in foolishly. It had had the frame crack at the the slide stop pin hole through to the rail. I bought it used, so I wasn't expecting much warranty wise. When I contacted them they told me to send it in cause it might be called a "Factory defect". They paid for the shipping both ways and when I got it back, it had the latest 6906 frame (blued trigger and hammer) on it-stamped 669, same serial number. I was very happy, thought that that was great customer service. I don't believe I have the serial number anywhere, but that might be my old 669. And since I'm in the neighborhood with you possibly...
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I said I wasn't going to buy any more S&W's silentflyer S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 5 07-22-2019 01:52 PM
I wasn't going to get a M-19......... rubiranch S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 7 02-18-2019 07:33 PM
I wasn't really looking to buy Glashaus S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 18 04-25-2016 06:56 PM
Wasn't sure Allen in MT S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 2 09-12-2012 01:00 PM
I wasn't looking . . . nicky4968 The Lounge 3 01-12-2012 07:54 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:43 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)