|
|
05-19-2009, 06:33 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Orlando,Fl. US
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Liked 30 Times in 20 Posts
|
|
Has anyone been having problems with the external extractor on the S&W 1911's?
|
05-19-2009, 07:01 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sainte Genevieve MO
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 991
Liked 565 Times in 234 Posts
|
|
Hi Kilroy2721,
I have not had any problems and I was always one to point them out as a "cheaper" alternative to an already good design.
My S&W 1911 has run reliably since new and been shot quite a bit.
Good luck
Mike
|
05-19-2009, 07:27 AM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 5,062
Likes: 739
Liked 3,271 Times in 1,282 Posts
|
|
I have owned a couple dozen S&W's with external extractors, including 2 of their 1911's. All have run fine.
S&W has done external extractors in volume sufficient to have the bugs well worked out.
|
05-19-2009, 09:20 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Rocky Mountains
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 631
Liked 109 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
I know of no issues with them, although I don't like them on 1911's, just because they are not in keeping with JMB's original design. FWIW I don't like full legnth guidrods on 1911s for the same reason. It just doesn't belong there. OK I'm an old fogey at age 38.
__________________
Formerly know as Lucky Derby
|
05-19-2009, 02:26 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SE Iowa on the Mississipp
Posts: 3,137
Likes: 1
Liked 352 Times in 230 Posts
|
|
You figure S&W has used external extractors on it's .45s' since '85 with little trouble. Wilson, Caspian and several other high end 1911s' have also used the external extractors. Yes, they wern't in the original design, but there have been a few other upgrades made that seem worthwhile also.
|
05-19-2009, 03:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 232
Likes: 9
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Lucky Derby:
I know of no issues with them, although I don't like them on 1911's, just because they are not in keeping with JMB's original design. FWIW I don't like full legnth guidrods on 1911s for the same reason. It just doesn't belong there. OK I'm an old fogey at age 38.
|
Didn't Kimber have problems with EEs on the Custom II?
A lot of people don't seem to like full length guide rods. Is there a reason other than the one you gave? I've read that two piece guide rods are easier when assembling after field stripping? Any details on that? Thanks
|
05-19-2009, 05:24 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Citrus County, Florida
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 21
Liked 218 Times in 110 Posts
|
|
I have a S&W 1911PC external ex., as well as a bunch of 3rd gens with external. Many rounds fired, zero problems.
I have an old (1942) tuned 1911AI Colt, which while I never have had serious problems with the extractor, I have had it break. I keep a spare fitted extractor. I don’t think it’s the highpoint of JMB’s design.
SIG has changed their P220 from internal to external because of some problems with the internal.
I have both full length and two piece guide rods, I like the two piece better for routine field stripping. I am cautioned that it could unscrew itself under fire. Again many rounds fired, no problem.
__________________
Ipsis Rebus Dictantitbus
|
05-19-2009, 10:17 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 3,952
Likes: 0
Liked 30 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Conch,
The reason I prefer a non-guide rod gun is three fold.
1st, a press check is easier W/O one.
2nd, in some cases it could get in the way of a desperation rack of the action.
But the biggest one is just the principal of not liking to need a tool in order to tear one down.
All that said, I own 3 with them though!
|
05-20-2009, 12:28 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: KY
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
I have had no problems with mine at all, I will also go as far as to say that it is an improvement over the original in that you don't have to fit a new one every 1-2k rounds.
As for FLGR I have no problem with them or the original, I don't do press checks my gun is always loaded, I think a desperation rack is very unlikely for me, and I'm not sure how a tool is needed for the take down of the gun. Before I replaced my bushing with an EGW one I could push down on the plug and turn the bushing by hand, I now need a bushing wrench or other hard object to turn the bushing as it fits very tight.
|
05-22-2009, 01:04 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 3,952
Likes: 0
Liked 30 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Unless you have one with a loaded chamber indicator or view milling, you have no idea what the status of the chamber is unless you check it?
I also pray to never have to rack a short stroked gun wounded wing, but it's much easier to do on a table top, chair rail or door's edge W/O that full length rod blocking the attempt?
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|