Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson General Topics > Smith & Wesson - The Wish List

Notices

Smith & Wesson - The Wish List Products You WISH S&W would Manufacture


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-25-2010, 09:13 PM
Smith357's Avatar
Smith357 Smith357 is offline
Moderator
Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame  
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 4,552
Likes: 931
Liked 3,590 Times in 816 Posts
Default Weird thought, .22lr X frame

.22lr X frame? Am I out of my ever lovin' mind?

Since S&W can get 8 shots of 22lr in a J frame and 10 in the K frame how many could they squeeze into an X frame? 15? 18? 20? USFA has crammed 12 .22lrs into a SAA cylinder The New Model 12/22™

Then to make it lighter they could use an alloy frame and pencil barrel.

Or how about a double bore that looks like a full underlug with chambers staggered in the cylinder?


I have got to quit thinking about stuff like this.
__________________
Regards,
Guy-Harold Smith II
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-26-2010, 03:37 PM
valkyriekl's Avatar
valkyriekl valkyriekl is offline
Member
Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 948
Likes: 64
Liked 111 Times in 46 Posts
Default

I'd really like a 10 or 12-shot .22 N-frame to go with my S&W 625; the N-frame grip and balance (especially with the 5") really works well for me; so it'd be cool to have something like a 5" half-lug N-frame .22 (to compensate for the smaller bore diameter).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-26-2010, 04:04 PM
red9 red9 is offline
SWCA Member
Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 1,052
Liked 2,547 Times in 462 Posts
Default

Taurus makes (or at least made) 22's and 17's on their large Raging Bull frame. Neat guns! I'd like to see a Smith to compete.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-01-2010, 07:17 AM
Maximumbob54's Avatar
Maximumbob54 Maximumbob54 is offline
Member
Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,202
Likes: 9,079
Liked 1,921 Times in 1,043 Posts
Default

This is crazy talk but a buddy of mine wants to see an over / under .22LR barrel where the cylinder is staggered with and inner and outer ring. He had me going until we started to think what the cost vs use of such a thing would be. Like I said, crazy talk.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-06-2010, 11:07 PM
stantheman86 stantheman86 is offline
US Veteran
Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,477
Likes: 18
Liked 526 Times in 242 Posts
Default

An X-frame .22 LR Talk about overbuilt...I think a K-Frame 10-shot .22 is almost too much steel for that little round.....An X-frame, even with 14 or so little holes, would have a heavy cylinder and have the same problem as the .357 Ruger Redhawk, so much steel and weight that in fast DA or hard SA, over time the cylinder stop and bolt stop notches get beat up and the cylinder gets loose.

I would like to see a 6 or 7 shot 4" J-frame .22 LR with adjustable sights.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-07-2010, 12:38 AM
Sprefix's Avatar
Sprefix Sprefix is offline
US Veteran
Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame Weird thought, .22lr X frame  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 61N149W
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 1,426
Liked 1,104 Times in 550 Posts
Lightbulb Here's some fodder for the brain.....X-frame was to be used as .223!!!!

The task of designing a new DA revolver, with an entirely new frame size, capable of handling pressures typical of a bolt action rifle, fell largely to S&W engineer Brett Curry. Before Curry was turned loose on what would come to be known as the X-frame, however, he was given an instruction that would ultimately make the .500 S&W Magnum even more formidable than the company intended.
Herb Belin, the head of S&W revolver product development at the time, was thinking that any new frame size should, like that of all other S&W revolvers, be usable for a variety of calibers, not just one. Belin (or one of his team) thought that it might be possible, sometime in the future, to build an X-frame revolver that would shoot the .223 rifle round. Belin told Curry to make the new gun’s frame and cylinder long enough to swallow a .223 round without modification. Then, without thinking about the implications of what he had just done, Belin sent Curry on his way and went back to his desk to tackle his in-box. (I wasn’t there, but that’s how I imagine it happening.) --------Now, what could have been or will be......The birth of the .500 S&W and I believe it could be chambered as you wish but WHAT A BEHEMOTH!!!!!
__________________
Go big or stay home
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
223, 22lr, j frame, k frame, k-frame, model 625, n-frame, redhawk, ruger, saa, taurus


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Weird custom grip for N frame revolvers theinspector S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 16 03-16-2015 07:26 PM
Weird J-Frame Issue 390ish S&W-Smithing 4 08-06-2013 06:10 PM
Weird early Beakhart or I frame grips? rlee1976 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 13 04-20-2013 10:08 AM
.....and I thought .22LR was expensive jgh4445 The Lounge 5 03-17-2013 07:17 PM
When the goin' gets weird....the weird turn pro CAJUNLAWYER The Lounge 7 08-27-2010 10:28 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:26 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)