Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson General Topics > Smith & Wesson - The Wish List

Notices

Smith & Wesson - The Wish List Products You WISH S&W would Manufacture


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-12-2020, 10:35 PM
hkcavalier's Avatar
hkcavalier hkcavalier is offline
US Veteran
17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug  
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 3,306
Likes: 1,766
Liked 7,287 Times in 1,899 Posts
Default 17 and 617 no lug

I know there's a lot of us on here who love the full lug rimfires. I don't see the point. The regular no-lug barrels are heavy enough with all that steel left in the barrel. The 4" ones balance ok, but longer than that and they get real heavy.

They don't have to be super traditional, I'll take a 10 shot. 4" and 6" of course, and I'd LOVE to see some 5" guns.
__________________
Psalm 27:2
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 10-13-2020, 06:30 AM
Dave Lively Dave Lively is offline
Member
17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug  
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 786
Liked 1,371 Times in 655 Posts
Default

I traded a lightly used Glock 48 + $75 for a brand new 617 with a 4 inch barrel this summer. With the shorter barrel it balances fine but if there was a lug free version I would have paid extra for it. It shoots great but a 22 doesn't need to be that heavy. I used mine as a range gun for shooting at small steel targets and informal target shooting. Not everyone that buys a 617 is a bullseye, ICORE or steel challenge competitor.

Blued or stainless doesn't matter to me. Either would be fine.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-13-2020, 07:08 AM
Sgt911 Sgt911 is offline
Member
17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug  
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 642
Likes: 942
Liked 833 Times in 340 Posts
Default

I think newer 63s would actually look better with a full lug. It looks strange to me with the shrouded extractor rod and 3" barrel. The 317 looks better. S&W needs more J and K frame .22 configurations.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 10-13-2020, 07:35 AM
Babysitr Babysitr is offline
Member
17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug  
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: southern illinois
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 2,264
Liked 2,395 Times in 1,013 Posts
Default

My 617 is a 6" from 1993, full lug....love it....shot a lot. it does feel a little muzzle heavy to me. that said, a lot of newer shooters seem to like it a lot?
not sure about that
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-13-2020, 08:12 AM
Jerry in SC Jerry in SC is offline
Member
17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Upstate
Posts: 465
Likes: 150
Liked 93 Times in 55 Posts
Default

The new 17’s are pretty nice. There will be another run of them at some point.

I have a 617-6 that is as smooth as I’ve seen from S&W. I was surprised I’d like the ten shot version, the DA is slick.

There are 617 no lugs out there in 4” and 6”, you’ll need the big check book.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-13-2020, 10:11 AM
Sgt911 Sgt911 is offline
Member
17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug  
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 642
Likes: 942
Liked 833 Times in 340 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry in SC View Post
The new 17’s are pretty nice. There will be another run of them at some point.

I have a 617-6 that is as smooth as I’ve seen from S&W. I was surprised I’d like the ten shot version, the DA is slick.

There are 617 no lugs out there in 4” and 6”, you’ll need the big check book.
I bought a new 6" 48 a couple months ago it is very nice. If they would make a 8 or 10 shot version in .22 that would be great. I saw a 5" 63 while browsing and that looked good.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-13-2020, 11:04 AM
colt_saa's Avatar
colt_saa colt_saa is offline
SWCA Member
17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,579
Likes: 3,066
Liked 22,559 Times in 5,844 Posts
Default

I agree that the 6" full lug 10 shot model 617 that is currently available is too heavy for a 22 LR revolver.

A more traditional half lug barrel would make a great woods gun. Good corrosion resistance and not too heavy

I especially liked the Heritage Edition Model 17s that Lew Horton commissioned 12+ years ago





I think these are the prettiest K22s to come out of the factory in years. Though I did change the grips on mine

Had I realized what these were, when they where being made, I would have bought one of the nickel versions or/and one of the color case hardened ones.

The new 8 shot model 63s are pretty cool. I will occasionally throw mine in the front pocket. The 317s are just too lightweight for my taste
__________________
"Acta non verba"
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 10-13-2020, 12:42 PM
Sgt911 Sgt911 is offline
Member
17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug  
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 642
Likes: 942
Liked 833 Times in 340 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by colt_saa View Post
I agree that the 6" full lug 10 shot model 617 that is currently available is too heavy for a 22 LR revolver.

A more traditional half lug barrel would make a great woods gun. Good corrosion resistance and not too heavy

I especially liked the Heritage Edition Model 17s that Lew Horton commissioned 12+ years ago





I think these are the prettiest K22s to come out of the factory in years. Though I did change the grips on mine

Had I realized what these were, when they where being made, I would have bought one of the nickel versions or/and one of the color case hardened ones.

The new 8 shot model 63s are pretty cool. I will occasionally throw mine in the front pocket. The 317s are just too lightweight for my taste
Beautiful!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-14-2020, 07:02 PM
bdGreen bdGreen is offline
SWCA Member
17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug  
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 1,821
Liked 13,608 Times in 1,726 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sgt911 View Post
I bought a new 6" 48 a couple months ago it is very nice. If they would make a 8 or 10 shot version in .22 that would be great. I saw a 5" 63 while browsing and that looked good.
Best of the best.

enjoy,
bdGreen





Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 10-14-2020, 07:53 PM
scooter123 scooter123 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 6,926
Likes: 179
Liked 4,301 Times in 2,112 Posts
Default

IIRC the 6 shot 6 inch 617 no dash I own weighs in at 52 ounces, at a guess that is about the weight of a 4 inch 500 Magnum. Yeah I really should check that but S&W's web site last time I was there was slow as cold molasses. Anyhow I have many times considered taking my 617 into the machine shop at work and re-configuring the barrel into a semi lugged profile. What has stopped me from doing this is that with some steels internal stresses can cause the steel to bow a LOT when you remove a large chunk of metal from one side.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-15-2020, 12:54 AM
hkcavalier's Avatar
hkcavalier hkcavalier is offline
US Veteran
17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug  
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 3,306
Likes: 1,766
Liked 7,287 Times in 1,899 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bdGreen View Post
Best of the best.

enjoy,
bdGreen





I'd be happy with one of these as well.
__________________
Psalm 27:2
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #12  
Old 10-20-2020, 12:07 AM
raljr1 raljr1 is offline
SWCA Member
17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug 17 and 617 no lug  
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northeast FL
Posts: 5,780
Likes: 7,438
Liked 15,134 Times in 3,616 Posts
Default

Out vit the lug already.
__________________
Robert
SWCA #2906, SWHF #760
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:28 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)