Wrists and hearing is overrated anyways....

Miami_JBT

US Veteran
Joined
Mar 4, 2010
Messages
975
Reaction score
4,866
Location
All over Florida
Buddy "lent" it to me. By "lent", it really is just an extended payment plan like Rent-A-Center. You take possession of it, and just pay it off. :D

20240707_141346_jpg-3260847.JPG


A factory quad-ported, pre-lock Model 629-5 Mountain Gun in .44 Magnum.

My buddy is a fan of .44 Magnum, but he told me that the Moutain Gun is too much gun even for him. Well, I'm stupid, so I figured what the heck. I'll give this blaster a new home. Been wanting a 4" .44 Mag as a carry piece and the Moutain Gun is just right. Especially since I'll basically pull an Inspector Harry Callahan and shoot .44 Specials out of it.

I like the Mountain Gun since I basically see it as a Model 624 that can safely chamber and shoot .44 Magnum.
 
Register to hide this ad
Cool!

My 625-6 MG 45 Colt has been magna-ported, but just two ports. Pretty much useless on a 45 Colt.
 
Id love a mountain gun. But without the ports.

I mostly just shoot 250Gr @ 1000 FPS in special casings. One of these days I mean to load up some true magnums but the heavy specials shoot good and hit hard as is
 
I'm pretty sure that the ports work. I have a PC double-Magnaported 3" 629, and it kicks significantly less than my 4" 29 with the same ammo.

Enjoy!

In my not so humble opinion it make a decent difference. Back in the mid 70 my buddy got his blue 4'' 29 done. I had had a identical gun except mine was nickel. We both had the same Pacs on our guns.

I noticed a significance reduction in felt recoil with his gun. We were shooting factory 44M ammo.

I was going to get mine done also as I hunted with it and also use it in the bowling pin matches our club had. Was but found I needed the money for something else we were told to prepare for a new shooter in my growing family!!:)
 
I like the revolver but not the ports. Too bad there is no easy way to fill them in.

Kevin

The man said too bad
No easy way to fill but
J B fixes all

haiku because I tried to post just the image and system said too short
 

Attachments

  • j-b-weld-go-kart-when-strength-really-matters-featuring-nick-offerman-large-3-301744435.jpg
    j-b-weld-go-kart-when-strength-really-matters-featuring-nick-offerman-large-3-301744435.jpg
    41.6 KB · Views: 17
Buddy "lent" it to me. By "lent", it really is just an extended payment plan like Rent-A-Center. You take possession of it, and just pay it off. :D

20240707_141346_jpg-3260847.JPG


A factory quad-ported, pre-lock Model 629-5 Mountain Gun in .44 Magnum.
My buddy is a fan of .44 Magnum, but he told me that the Moutain Gun is too much gun even for him. Well, I'm stupid, so I figured what the heck. I'll give this blaster a new home. Been wanting a 4" .44 Mag as a carry piece and the Moutain Gun is just right. Especially since I'll basically pull an Inspector Harry Callahan and shoot .44 Specials out of it.

I like the Mountain Gun since I basically see it as a Model 624 that can safely chamber and shoot .44 Magnum.
Here is a C&P of a post here where I said pretty much the same thing from the first post in my thread on the 629 MG.

One time, I was at an indoor range in Wichita with my 629 Mountain Gun, and I had just finished shooting it with 44 Specials, and was trying some magnums in it and this guy comes over and asks me what I am shooting as the MG was LOUD. He had been shooting a 22 or some such.
I said, "it's a 44 magnum MG. Would you care to try it?"
"Yeah!"
"Now I have to warn you that it kicks like hell."
He shrugged it off. "Aw, that's no problem."
All right I handed him the MG, and some Remington 180gr cartridges. He loaded the gun and cocked the hammer. You could tell he was not prepared for that recoil. He touched another one off and then one more. He handed the gun back.
He then calledme a very profane name.
"What are you talking about? I told you it kicked like helll."
"You told me." And he walked away.


With that introduction, the MG is a very good concept, IMHO, because even though it is chambered for the 44 Magnum, I regard it as a 44 Special that I can shoot Magnums in if I want to. But since I am not a masochist, that does not happen that often.

My particular specimen is around thirty years old, and it was produced in the early 1990's, right after S&W recognized that the Magnum rounds were causing timing issues, and I understand that they made some improvements to the lockwork to correct these problems and I have noticed the difference in other newer N-frames that I bought after the MG.

A description: it is a stainless steel six-shot revolver, built on the N-frame--that is, the large frame. This is also, I believe, one of the first of the round-butt N-frames. My impression is that they did this primarily to shave weight, and I note (somewhat ruefully) that whereever they could safely reduce weight on this revolver, they did so. I am talking here of reducing the outside diameter of the barrel, and they even bevelled off the front of the cylinder. In this regard, the caliber listed on the barrel is laser-etched on the right hand side and the manufacturere's name on the left side. Possibly, the barrel was too thin to allow the stamping that they normally do.

The result is a very lightweight revolver; one that weighs less than some of my L-frames.

One day, I decided to take it out and do some shooting, but not with Magnums. I didn't have any anyway. I didn't do a bench test, preferring to evaluate the practical accuracy of the revolver at what we on this forum typically use a handgun for: defensive-style shooting.

I shot about 50-60 rounds of some old remanufactured 240 grain RNFP ammo that I got from a local shop and some old Winchester 246 grain RNL and finally, some of the PMC 180 grain JHP stuff. There were no misfires, and the gun handled everything with aplomb. I did my usual shoot-while-move drill and if the poor target was not deader than old Marley before I started shooting, it certainly was after. I would shoot a couple of rounds and move back and to the side at the same time, then repeat the exercise while moving back and to the other side. Most of the time I did not use the sights, doing plain old point shooting.

All shooting was DA and there were no misfires.

Now, is this the ideal carry-gun? Of course not. It is an N-frame S&W and not everyone can conceal it effectively. But, if you can conceal it well, and are interested in a large-bore six-shot wheelgun, the MG might be the gun for you. Assuming, of course, that you can even find one.


***The above is a near C&P of a post I first made in the old Kansas forum. ***
 
There is a very good article in Guns & Ammo Magazine, October 1989 by Ross Seyfried on the Smith & Wesson Mountain Revolver. The article talks about the concepts and persons involved in bringing this fine revolver to life. I found my copy on a well known auction site a couple of years ago. I like this revolver enough that it is the only post 1965 44 magnum that I own.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240709_092119_kindlephoto-2813226.jpg
    IMG_20240709_092119_kindlephoto-2813226.jpg
    114.6 KB · Views: 22
I had one when they first came out.
Mine went back to the factory 3 times.
Soured me on S&W for a long time.
Kept shearing the screws holding the rear sight on and loosening the front sight blade.
And going out of time.
got rid of it when it came back the 3rd time.
Guess I got a lemon.
Moved on to a M69 now.
And they could be hard kickers,people forget these are designed as carry guns not range toys.
 
Back
Top