View Single Post
 
Old 11-23-2009, 03:46 AM
2152hq 2152hq is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,786
Likes: 1,649
Liked 9,234 Times in 3,409 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bettis1 View Post
2152hq,

Thanks for that info about the Spanish gunmakers using Roman numerals too. The Mexican carver makes a lot of sense. Of course, the ease of making the marks, without any curves, just a few quick sweeps with a knife or graver, also makes sense with a fragile material like MOP.

Bob
You're welcome.
The easily made Roman Numerals were undoubtedly one reason the markings system was chosen IMHO. Done quickly and at times crudely it was still a quick and positive identification method.
I've never seen one in steel that was done with purpose made letter punches/stamps. Mostly scatched into the surface(s) with a pointed scribe or in some cases the letters made quickly with just a straight chisel edge used to form out the letters with light hammer taps.

Also R/Numerals were universally recognized and even the less than educated could most often still read them or at least match them up to each other and their commonly used steel parts assembly trays that were also marked.
The numbers range at times was quite high as the parts lots went through the mfg processes with makers like Star, Llama, etc. But as the guns were finished and out of production, the numbers/trays were recycled through the system again.

Also, some small makers & one-of makers (alot of the industry was still cottage industry) may have chosen an extremely high numeral prefix for a personal identification of sorts. They were outsource workers in many instances and their name didn't appear on the final product. I wouldn't doubt if some of those grip makers had done the same to leave a personalized mark of sorts.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post: