Does this PO anyone else like it does me?

Just what the branches need, Washington telling them what policies to adopt locally.

It's not a problem with personal gun ownership, storage, guns, access or anything else. It was a problem with the person.

He was not a "disgruntled army Dr.", he was a religious zealot with a plan to harm the US. And they had already identified it. Absent a gun it would have been a bomb or worse.

Meanwhile, everyone else will now become more vulnerable and more restricted due to their changes. The terrorists won't mind it a bit, they don't care about the rules.

Munster

__________________
GO NAVY!