Thread: Why no Airweights with a Ti cylinder?
View Single Post
 
Old 02-01-2011, 03:09 PM
allglock allglock is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Se. Pa.
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 67
Liked 81 Times in 50 Posts
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronnie gore View Post
they do, 342, 337.
They are Expensive Scandium.... 442 is just cheap alloy.
With the 442s going for $389 now, whats another $25-$50 or so for a Ti cyl.?
I was just wondering if the Ti cyl. doesn't mate well with the cheaper alloy? (maybe the extra vibration of the Ti Cyl. could cause the alloy frame to crack)? Just a thought....
Last edited by allglock; 02-01-2011 at 03:12 PM.
Reply With Quote