View Single Post
 
Old 04-08-2012, 02:53 AM
TexasArmed's Avatar
TexasArmed TexasArmed is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NE Texas
Posts: 657
Likes: 172
Liked 528 Times in 228 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmort666 View Post
Not in Ohio. If I shoot somebody in self-defense and either am not charged, or am acquitted, neither my assailant nor his survivors can collect a PENNY from me.

In Ohio we don't believe that a failed attacker should be able to profit from his lack of skill or luck.
cmort666 I agree with you regarding the protection intended by the castle doctrine. Here is a case in Texas where this law failed to protect the homeowner from a significant expense of over $60,000 after he had to defend a civil case, even after the criminal charges were dismissed.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...g=content;col1

The case was the Graham Chambers shooting in Tyler, Texas 2009 in which the homeowner was not convicted. Although succesful in defending the criminal charges, it being self defense. I would guess that Ohio's castle doctrine is not much different from the one we have in Texas.