Quote:
Originally Posted by DonD
Waiver?? Get serious, no waiver has EVER prevented ambulance chasing liability lawyers from extorting money from the innocent. Hold harmless paperwork is the same way, the lawyers still find some way to get someone else to pay for the ignorance or mistakes of their clients.
S&W knows quite well that the ILS isn't popular and they haven't really changed their policy. So...don't like the lock, don't buy one with it and you give up a nice selection of guns that have the lock.
On to the original subject, if the picture is representative, the gun has very nice grips. Don
|
Well, if the "ambulance chasing juries" would "just say no" to such claims, we would not have this problem as the "ambulance chasing lawyers," who are paid by a contingent fee (a percentage of the winnings) would not waste their time if the juries, made up of non-lawyers, would just say no or stop letting the "ambulance chasing lawyers." There would be no winnings, the lawyers would not be paid, and would move on to some other type of case.
Why is it that S&W can offer the M&P line with and without the lock, but not the revolvers? It makes no sense to me.