View Single Post
 
Old 01-29-2013, 02:38 PM
The Annoyed Man The Annoyed Man is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Grapevine, Texas
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale53 View Post
I believe that there is a limit to nearly everything. In my opinion, the S&W 642 represents the lower weight limit for a .38 Special revolver for several reasons. Reasonable wear and reasonable recoil are two that come to mind. The alloy frame with a steel cylinder is light ENOUGH for me and is totally practical. Those pictures illustrate it much better than I could state it regarding the use of a titanium cylinder - too light and not particularly durable.

I am not a particular fan of "trick" bullets either. A good 158 gr lead Hollow Point with a Plus P load is enough for me.

Every body has their opinion and that is mine. Kind of like the artistic term "the golden mean"...

Dale53
I own the M&P version of this scandium J-frame .357, and I've had none of these problems:


This model has a stainless steel cylinder, coated with what appears to be melonite. The worse that has happened is a little bit of what I would call "scorching" on the front face of the cylinder, which is apparent in this picture. I have fired 110 grain .357 Winchester White Box in this gun, as well as my 125 grain .357 Critical Defense carry load, and even a 158 grain jacketed soft point white tail hunting load.....which beat the hell out of my hand, but didn't seem to hurt the gun one bit.

I initially bought the M&P340 when I was shopping for a PD model, but the store I bought from didn't have the PD. I "settled" for the M&P. The reason I initially thought I had "settled," was because I really had my heart set on the additional 2 oz less of weight that the PD offers compared to the M&P. But in hindsight, 2 oz doesn't matter a hill of beans when you're comparing an 11 oz gun to a 13 oz gun—both are insanely light—and I'm actually happier for having the more robust cylinder of the two pistols.

I also prefer the huge Trijicon "express" front sight on the gun. This is not my primary carry weapon, and all of my carry guns have Trijicon sights on them, but with the exception of the orange Trijicon HD sights on one of my semiautos, this system on the M&P340 works better than the rest of of them.

The M&P340 is the best snubby I've ever owned, and that includes an 642 I used to own, and a 2" 640, plus the 642CT that my wife still owns (and never carries because she can't handle the trigger pull....something about carpel tunnel...).
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post: