What right do you have to pass judgement on a transaction that both seller and buyer agree too. What you and others with this attitude don't understand is this is how it works. Goods flow to where the demand is. If someone in Fla. buys ammo,puts it on gunbroker and someone from Maine buys it you have a prime example of how markets work. Interference in the market actually forces prices up and causes furthers shortages. The cost is meaningless as it is an agreed upon price that both parties agree too.