View Single Post
 
Old 02-26-2014, 05:51 PM
MichiganScott MichiganScott is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: God's Country
Posts: 4,711
Likes: 1,235
Liked 3,535 Times in 1,770 Posts
Default

Just by looking at the data 300MP appears to be slower than 296/110, probably with a burn rate around that of IMR4227. Doesn't really matter because trying to work up loads without data because someone says one powder is identical to another is asking for problems.

Use the 300MP data, start low, and work your way back up.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post: