View Single Post
 
Old 10-30-2014, 10:58 PM
CoMF CoMF is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 474
Liked 1,447 Times in 670 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kakarote9130 View Post
I'm new to pistols, so what I'm asking may seem boring or ignorant to some, but maybe it will help others like me.
A frangible projectile, (to my limited knowledge) is one that upon hitting its target, splinters in to several pieces. And a JHP spreads or mushrooms upon impact but does not splinter.
I've also read, "IF" I were to use a frangible round in an altercation, it could very well hurt my case in court, Due to it's damaging properties.
If this is true, why would police be ordering these? Seeing as I would be frowned upon if I used them. Is there a double standard here?
First off, welcome to the forum.

Frangible projectiles are intended for training (i.e. practice) and are designed to disintegrate on impact with a hard surface; this is meant to eliminate the possibility of ricochets. Frangible rounds were never intended for an anti-personnel role, therefore it stands to reason that a quality JHP round is a wiser choice for self-defense than the former.

I hope this helps.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post: