View Single Post
 
Old 12-29-2014, 06:01 PM
ChattanoogaPhil's Avatar
ChattanoogaPhil ChattanoogaPhil is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,602
Likes: 7,937
Liked 20,623 Times in 5,958 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rastoff View Post
The labeling attached to the gun said it had the feature he wanted. Why should he have to examine it more?
All wrapper labeling and such should be removed to inspect the gun for damage/cosmetics, and while inspecting the gun you of course read all markings on the gun. Basics.

In this case it sounds like to me SW is culpable. But that's no reason to suggest that inspecting a paper label is a substitute for basic gun inspection prior to transfer.

Last edited by ChattanoogaPhil; 12-29-2014 at 06:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post: