View Single Post
 
Old 01-11-2015, 08:55 PM
Hapworth Hapworth is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5,831
Likes: 3,902
Liked 5,902 Times in 2,543 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug M. View Post
#4 is generally considered to have sub-optimal penetration on an offender wearing a heavy jacket.

In a .38, it is hard to go wrong with plain old wadcutters, with SWC also a good choice and used as reloads. If I were really pushing for HPs, it would likely be the Black Hills with the all copper Barnes bullet.
But how to get #4 buck through a Model 10?

Yeah, going by the tests, #1 is the smallest buck that still makes protocol penetration. I've also found #4 kicks more and spreads wide fast compared to a dedicated defense buck load like Remington's Managed Recoil or the Federal LE Flight Control rounds.

As for wadcutters, I follow the discussions on their defensive utility, but assume it's the bullet itself that's being discussed, loaded to defense velocities; I'd assume the cream puff "waductters" -- meaning match loads -- at approximately 600 feet persecond would be a bit weak for defense?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post: