View Single Post
 
Old 11-21-2015, 01:05 PM
Mainsail's Avatar
Mainsail Mainsail is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: On someone's last nerve..
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 944
Liked 2,520 Times in 795 Posts
Default

I don't think anything (glock, polymer, gov contracts, etc.) 'drove' Smith to drop their steel line except profitability. Steel/alloy guns still sell, and sell very well. (In the current market everything is selling well.) Smith chose to adjust their business model towards the plastic market and away from the steel and alloy guns. Had they kept the lines going I'm sure they could move every all-metal gun they made, just the profit would be lower.

To be mass market competitive every manufacturer 'must' have a poly-striker gun that they can put in the display window of gun shops or online; the steel guns will sell as well but with a lower profit margin.

Hand made and hand fitted are relics for any mass market industry. Modern "product realization" focuses on just-in-time logistics, modularity, remove-and-replace, and disposable.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post: