That Fox news story was disturbing on a number of issues. Shoot to kill vs shoot to wound was repeated by the media reporter at least three times .. and such a straw man argument never goes well.

I know of no law tolerant of "intent to kill nor intent to wound" and the only correct response to such insistence on the part of the reporter would be that one shoots to stop the threat .. that is all. Three times she repeated the "theme" and it was only addressed correctly once ..

I'm more than a little concerned that people gloss over the "use of force" aspects of gun ownership .. instead concerning themselves with other aspects related to using a firearm. Folks, we really need to be on the same page on this issue