Well, you can make the argument that the Value Line numbering system makes sense, but it's almost like saying the .45 GAP was a great idea.

In reality, the .45 GAP was a great idea EXCEPT when you consider the hundred years of existence, success and unreal popularity of the .45 ACP which means that the .45 GAP was a face in the dirt failure.

The Value Line model numbering system makes sense on it's own, but further muddies the water of the original/irrational 3rd Gen model number system. Even to this day I'm sure that some see a Value Line and think "oh, 3 digits, must be a 2nd Gen!"

Smith & Wesson, far better at building semi-auto pistols than naming them.