View Single Post
 
Old 06-30-2018, 12:53 PM
Doug M.'s Avatar
Doug M. Doug M. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 7,477
Likes: 14,598
Liked 9,314 Times in 3,723 Posts
Default

Some years ago, a very serious expert in the field, active in LE, training, and ballistics research, mentioned in a discussion (I think it was on another forum more directed to military/LE folks) that he was aware of agencies that prohibit lockable revolvers from being carried by officers because they are unsafe.

I don't care about the esthetics, but I won't have a firearm that is not at least potentially suitable for serious use, which precludes the lock models. It is not only a solution in search of a problem, but counterproductive (unsafe) in a serious use firearm.

Range toy? Fine. Hunting, SD, etc? No. Hell no. A zillion times hell no.
__________________
NHI, 10-8.

Last edited by Doug M.; 06-30-2018 at 06:14 PM. Reason: grammar
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post: