View Single Post
 
Old 09-14-2018, 01:13 AM
Rock185's Avatar
Rock185 Rock185 is offline
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Under the Tonto Rim
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 13,546
Liked 2,513 Times in 932 Posts
Default

Typetwelve, I agree about the moon clips, but most shooters do not seem to share our opinion. FWIW, 9MM +P, or even +P+, chronographed in these short 2"-3" barreled revolvers approximates velocities in 4"-5" semi-autos. So, for better or worse, I would expect effectiveness to be the same. Someone will probably be along soon to school me for about the 343rd. time that cylinder length should be included when comparing revolver vs. semi-auto velocities. I'm aware, and don't care, since I'm only reporting results, not trying to convince anybody of anything

For instance, the Federal 9MM 124 HST +P averages 1195 FPS in my 2" revolver, and 1291 FPS in a 3" revolver. The Federal "9BPLE" 115 grain +P+ averaged 1213 FPS in the same 2" revolver, 1313 FPS in the 3". So, counter intuitive as it might seem, the 9MM revolvers don't lose much ballistically as compared to semi-autos of similar, or even longer barrel length. I realize other's results might vary, since no two manufactured items, like guns, are exactly the same.....
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 5-shooter 9s.JPG (147.0 KB, 62 views)
__________________
NRA Life, COTEP 640
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post: