View Single Post
 
Old 09-14-2018, 08:56 AM
typetwelve typetwelve is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 492
Likes: 64
Liked 572 Times in 256 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock185 View Post
Typetwelve, I agree about the moon clips, but most shooters do not seem to share our opinion. FWIW, 9MM +P, or even +P+, chronographed in these short 2"-3" barreled revolvers approximates velocities in 4"-5" semi-autos. So, for better or worse, I would expect effectiveness to be the same. Someone will probably be along soon to school me for about the 343rd. time that cylinder length should be included when comparing revolver vs. semi-auto velocities. I'm aware, and don't care, since I'm only reporting results, not trying to convince anybody of anything

For instance, the Federal 9MM 124 HST +P averages 1195 FPS in my 2" revolver, and 1291 FPS in a 3" revolver. The Federal "9BPLE" 115 grain +P+ averaged 1213 FPS in the same 2" revolver, 1313 FPS in the 3". So, counter intuitive as it might seem, the 9MM revolvers don't lose much ballistically as compared to semi-autos of similar, or even longer barrel length. I realize other's results might vary, since no two manufactured items, like guns, are exactly the same.....
Here's a video that I didn't expect to see, neither did the maker:


(Cliff notes, MAC did some side by side testing of 9mm +P, .38 +P and .357 in short barrel revolvers. 9mm +P performed the best in terms of velocity.)

You know...not to derail this, but the moon clip thing still gets me. When I bought my 627 Pro, I had many people tell me "Aw man...moon clips? You'll regret getting that...", including my father.

I landed up with this tool here:

https://www.mooncliptool.com/

It really works well. My only real regret is not getting this one instead:

http://www.bmtequipped.com/purchase.php

This one seems to work much better than the one I have.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post: